Skip to main content

Colon Interposition

  • Conference paper
Esophageal Carcinoma

Part of the book series: Recent Results in Cancer Research ((RECENTCANCER,volume 155))

Abstract

In the anatomy of the colon vasculature, the ascending branch of the left colic artery is the primary supplying vessel (96.91%). Isoperistaltic transposition of the transverse colon is preferred (83.58%). Riolan’s vascular arcade is not a major vessel of the colon. It can only be found in less than 10% of patients, and whether or not this arcade is complete cannot be used as criterion to judge colon blood supply. Animal experiments and clinical studies have confirmed the superiority of one-layer over two-layer anastomosis. The former is simpler, safer, and more reliable, with a lower incidence of anastomotic leak or stricture. Based on a comprehensive evaluation of the disease type, patient age, heart and lung functions, nutritional status, and accompanying diseases, three colon transposition routes are available (anterosternal subcutaneous tunnel, retrosternal tunnel, and esophageal bed passage). The advantages and disadvantages of each route are analyzed, and the left-middle-left retrosternal route is described. The indications for esophageal reconstruction with colon operation (ERC) were collected and verified, increasing the number of indications to seven categories of diseases. The main complications of ERC, i.e., colon segment necrosis, anastomotic leak, recurrent laryngeal nerve injury, and intestinal obstruction were systematically studied, and their causes and prevention are detailed. The number of patients is the highest in a single unit among all the published reports. The incidence of complications and deaths are the lowest.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Coleman JJ III (1995) Reconstruction of the pharynx and cervical esophagus. Semin Surg Oncol 11:208–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Peters JH, Kronson JW, Katz M et al (1995) Arterial anatomic considerations in colon interposition for esophageal replacement. Arch Surg 130:858–862

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cerfolio RJ, Allen MS, Deschamps C et al (1995) Esophageal replacement by colon interposition. Ann Thorac Surg 59:1382–1384

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Urschel JD (1996) Late dysphagia after presternal colon interposition. Dysphagia 11:75–77

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahmad SA, Syivester KG, Hebra A (1996) et al Esophageal replacement using the colon: is it a good choice. J Pediatr Surg

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cheng BC, Gao SZ, Tu ZF et al (1989) Clinical observation of colic vessels with respect to their significance in the replacement of the esophagus by colon. Chin J Surg 27:566–568

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cheng BC, Gao SZ (1995) Anatomical study on the Riolan’s anastomosis arch. Chin J Surg 33:232–233

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gao SZ, Wang TS, Yao Z et al (1988) Experimental study and clinical application of a single row suturing esophagogastrostomy. Chin J Surg 26:665–666

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao SZ, Cheng BC, Tu ZF et al (1990) Experimental study and clinical application of a single-row suturing esophagogastrostomy. J Surg Oncol 42:167–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gao SZ, Cheng BC, Tu ZF et al (1992) Experimentelle Untersuchung und klinische Anwendung der esophagealen einreihigen Allschichtennahtanastomose. Chir Gastrienterol 8:372–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tu ZF, Gao SZ, Yao Z (1987) The improved technique of colon interposition. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 3:95–96

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao SZ (1965) The technique for retrosternal tunnel. Chin J Surg 3:680–682

    Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng BC, Lin DM, Tu ZF et al (1994) Colon replacement of esophagus: clinical experience of 252 cases. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 10:236

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cheng BC, Gao SZ, Tu ZF t al (1997) Management complications in colon replacement for esophagus. Chin J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1391–1393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2000 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cheng, B., Chen, K., Gao, S., Tu, Z. (2000). Colon Interposition. In: Lange, J., Siewert, J.R. (eds) Esophageal Carcinoma. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 155. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59600-1_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-64044-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-59600-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics