Skip to main content

What is the Relative Importance of Criteria and how to Use it in MCDM

  • Conference paper
Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 507))

Abstract

A lot of multiple criteria decision-making methods require the use of weights or importance of coefficients. Usually authors of the methods do not mathematically define these coefficients. Therefore, their methods are only heuristic. In order to successfully elicit and apply the relative importance of criteria, it is necessary to have a rigorous definition for the coefficients. In this paper a mathematical definition of the assertion ‘a group of criteria A is more important than a group of criteria B with two sets of positive parameters‘ is given. Based on the definition the numerical relative importance coefficients are mathematically defined. The main objective of the paper is to demonstrate how to apply those notions in decision making in order to restrict the well-known Pareto set.

This work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (project #98-01-00622)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refrences

  • Larichev O.I. (2000) Theory and methods of decision making. Logos, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn P.C. (1964) Utility theory for decision making, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney R.L., Raiffa H. (1976) Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives: preferences and value trade-offs, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noghin V.D. (1991) Estimation of the set of nondominated solutions. Numer. Func. Anal. Opt., 12(5&6):507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noghin V.D. (1997) Relative importance of criteria: a quantitative approach. J. of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 6:355–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noghin V.D., Tolstykh I.V. (2000) Using quantitative information on the relative importance of criteria for decision making. Computational Math, and Math. Phys., 40(11): 1593–1601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podinovskii V.V., Noghin V.D. (1982) Pareto-optimal solutions to multicriteria problems. Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Noghin, V.D. (2001). What is the Relative Importance of Criteria and how to Use it in MCDM. In: Köksalan, M., Zionts, S. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making in the New Millennium. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 507. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56680-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42377-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56680-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics