Skip to main content

Quantifying Uncertainty of Digital Elevation Models Derived from Topographic Maps

  • Conference paper
Advances in Spatial Data Handling

Abstract

This paper explores a methodology for quantifying the uncertainty of DEMs created by digitising topographic maps. The origins of uncertainty in DEM production were identified and examined. The uncertainty of DEM data was quantified by computing a vector total of Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) from the source map, sampling and measurement errors, and the interpolation process. Distributional measures including accuracy surfaces, spatial autocorrelation indices, and variograms were also employed to quantify the magnitude and spatial pattern of the uncertainty. The test for this methodology utilises a portion of a 1:24 000 topographic map centred on Stone Mountain in northeastern Georgia, USA. Five DEMs, constructed with different interpolation algorithms, are found to have the total RMSE ranging from 4.39 to 9.82 meters, and a highly concentrated pattern of uncertainty in rugged terrain. This study suggests that the RMSE provides only a general indicator of DEM uncertainty. Detailed studies should use distributional measures to understand how the uncertainty varies over a surface.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Refrences

  • Ackermann F (1978) Experimental investigation into the accuracy of contouring through DTM. In: Proceedings of Digital Terrain Modelling Symposium. St. Louis, pp 165–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann F (1994) Digital elevation models: techniques and applications, quality standards, development. In: ISPRS (ed) Proceedings of the Symposium on Mapping and Geographic Information Systems. University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, pp 421–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackermann F (1996) Techniques and strategies for DEM generation. In: Grève C (ed) Digital Photogrammetry: An Addendum to the Manual of Photogrammetry. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Falls Church, VA, pp 135–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Briggs IC (1974) Machine contouring using minimum curvature. Geophysics 39(1): 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr JR (1995) Numerical Analysis for the Geological Sciences. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis JC (1986) Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebner H, Reiss P (1984) Experience with height interpolation by finite elements. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 50(2): 177–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Eklundh L, Martensson U (1995) Rapid generation of digital elevation models from topographic maps. International Journal of Geographic Information Systems 9(3): 329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher P (1999) Models of uncertainty in spatial data. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems (Volume 1): Principles and Technical Issues (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 191–205

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao J (1997) Resolution and accuracy of terrain representation by grid DEMs at a microscale. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 11(2): 199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF, Buttenfield BP, Wood J (1994) Introduction to visualizing data quality. In: Hearshaw HM, Unwin DJ (eds) Visualization in Geographic Information Systems. John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 141–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith DA, Armhein CG (1991) Statistical Methods for Geographers. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth P (1992) Spatial analysis of DEM error. In: Proceedings of ASPRS/ACSM Annual Meeting. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Washington DC, pp, 187–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy RL (1990) Theory and applications of the multiquadratic-biharmonic method. Computers and Mathematics with Applications 19: 163–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heuvelink G (1999) Propagation of error in spatial modeling with GIS. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems (Volume 1): Principles and Technical Issues (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 207–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlding SW (1994) 3D Geoscience Modeling: Computer Techniques for Geological Characterization. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter GJ, Caetano M, Goodchild, MF (1995) A methodology for reporting uncertainty in spatial database products. Journal of the Urban and Regional Information Systems Association 7: 11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson MF, Gallant JC (1999) Representation of terrain. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems (Volume 1): Principles and Technical Issues (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 105–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam SN (1983) Spatial interpolation methods: a review. The American Cartographer 10(2): 129–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (1993a) Theoretical models of the accuracy of digital terrain models: An evaluation and some observations. Photogrammetric Record 14(82): 651–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (1993b) Mathematical models of the accuracy of digital terrain model surfaces linearly constructed from square gridded data. Photogrammetric Record 14(82): 661–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z (1994) A comparative study of the accuracy of digital terrain models (DTMs) based on various data models. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 49(1): 2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monckton C (1994) An investigation into the spatial structure of error in digital elevation data. In: Innovations in GIS 1. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 201–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie G (1990) Photogrammetric methods of data acquisition for terrain modelling. In: Petrie G, Kennie TJM (eds) Terrain Modeling in Surveying and Engineering. Whittles Publishing Services, Caithness, pp 26–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, JW (1990) The accuracy of digital terrain models. In: Petrie G, Kennie TJM (eds) Terrain Modeling in Surveying and Engineering. Whittles Publishing Services, Caithness, pp 315–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepard D (1968) A two dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data. In: Proceeding 23rd National Conference ACM. Brandon/Systems Press, Princeton, pp 517–523

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Torlegard K, Ostman A, Lindgren R (1987) A comparative test of photogrammetrically sampled digital elevation models. In: Transactions of the Royal Institute of Technology, Photogrammetric Reports Nr 53, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Veregin H (1999) Data quality parameters. In: Longley PA, Goodchild MF, Maguire DJ, Rhind DW (eds) Geographical Information Systems (Volume 1): Principles and Technical Issues (Second Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (1990) Comparative Studies of Spatial Interpolation Accuracy. Master thesis, Department of Geography, University of Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng Q (1998) Comparative assessment of spatial interpolation accuracy of elevation data. In: Proceedings of 1998 ACSM Annual Convention and Exhibition. Baltimore, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Weng Q (2001) A methodology for conceptualizing and quantifying uncertainty of Digital Elevation Models. In: Forer, P, Yeh A, He J (eds) Advances in GIS Research III: Towards Holistic Spatial Data Handling. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J (1996) The Geomorphological Charaterisation of Digital Elevation Models. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Geography, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J, Fisher P (1993) Assessing interpolation accuracy in elevation models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 13(2): 48–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wren AE (1975) Contouring and the contour map: a new perspective. Geographical Prospecting 23: 1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Weng, Q. (2002). Quantifying Uncertainty of Digital Elevation Models Derived from Topographic Maps. In: Richardson, D.E., van Oosterom, P. (eds) Advances in Spatial Data Handling. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56094-1_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56094-1_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-62859-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-56094-1

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics