Skip to main content

Using Ontologies and Formal Concept Analysis for Organizing Business Knowledge

  • Chapter
Wissensmanagement mit Referenzmodellen

Abstract

Ontologies provide explicit models of shared conceptualizations, and are useful for modeling formal, semi formal, and informal knowledge needed for communication within a company. As there is typically more than one ontology used in a company (for instance one in each department), techniques are needed to merge ontologies in order to assure cross-company communication. In this paper, we summarize one such approach, called FCA-MERGE. During its development, it turned out that a formal definition of ‘ontology’ is needed. The resulting definition is presented for the first time in detail in this paper.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chalupsky, H.: OntoMorph: A translation system for symbolic knowledge. Proc. 7th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, April 2000, pp. 471–482.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Decker, S.; Erdmann, M.; Fensel, D.; Studer, R.: Ontobroker: Ontology-based access to distributed and semi-structured information. In: R. Meers-man et al. (eds.), Database Semantics: Semantic Issues in Multimedia Systems, Proceedings TC2/WG 2.6 8th Working Conference on Database Semantics (DS-8), Rotorua, New Zealand, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganter, B.; Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Heidelberg 1999. (Translation of: Formale Begriffsanalyse: Mathematische Grundlagen. Springer, Heidelberg 1996.)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gruber, T.: Towards principles for the design of ontologies used for knowl-edge sharing. Intl. J. of Human and Computer Studies 43 (5/6), 1994, pp. 907–928.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N.: Understanding, building and using ontologies. Intl. J. of Hu-man and Computer Studies 46 (2/3), 1997, pp. 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van Heijst, G.; Schreiber, A.Th.; Wielinga, B.J.: Using explicit ontologies in KBS development. Intl. J. of Human and Computer Studies 46 (2/3), 1997, pp. 183–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hovy, E.: Combining and standardizing large-scale, practical ontologies for machine translation and other uses. Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, Spain, May 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kifer, M.; Lausen, G.; Wu, J.: Logical foundations of object-oriented and frame-based languages, Journal of the ACM 42, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  9. McGuinness, D.L.; Fikes, R.; Rice, J.; Wilder, S.: An environment for merging and testing large Ontologies. Proc. 7th Intl. Conf. on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR’2000), Breckenridge, Colorado, USA, April 2000, pp. 483–493.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Noy, N.F.; Musen, M.A.: PROMPT: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. Proc. 17th Natl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (AAA1’2000), Austin, TX, July/August 2000, pp. 450–455.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Staab, S.; Mädche, A.:Ontology engineering beyond the modeling of con-cepts and relations. Proc. ECAI’2000 workshop on application of ontologies and problem-solving methods, IOS Press, Amsterdam 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stumme, G.; Mädche, A.: FCA-Merge: Bottom-Up Merging of Ontologies. Proc. 17th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI `01). Seattle, WA, USA, 2001, 225–230.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stumme, G.; Taouil, R.; Bastide, Y.; Pasqier, N.; Lakhal, L.: Computing Iceberg Concept Lattices with Titanic. J. on Knowledge and Data Engineering (to appear).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wille, R.: Restructuring lattice theory: an approach based on hierarchies of concepts. In: I. Rival (ed.): Ordered sets. Reidel, Dordrecht-Boston 1982, pp. 445–470.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wille, R.: Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Theorie und Praxis. Informatik Spektrum 23 (6), 2000, pp. 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stumme, G. (2002). Using Ontologies and Formal Concept Analysis for Organizing Business Knowledge. In: Becker, J., Knackstedt, R. (eds) Wissensmanagement mit Referenzmodellen. Physica, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52449-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52449-3_4

  • Publisher Name: Physica, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-7908-1514-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-52449-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics