Abstract
This paper develops a methodology for analyzing the stability of AHP rankings for decision problems in which the paired comparison judgments are stochastic. Multivariate statistical techniques are used to obtain both point estimates and confidence intervals of rank reversal probabilities. We show how simulation experiments can be used to assess the stability of the preference rankings under uncertainty. High likelihoods of rank reversal imply that the AHP rankings are unstable, and that additional analysis of the decision problem may be in order.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arbel, A., “Approximate Articulation of Preference and Priority Derivation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 43 (1989), 317–326.
Arbel, A. and L. G. Vargas, “The Analytic Hierarchy Process with Interval Judgments,” in Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Proceedings of the IXth International Conference: Theory and Applications in Business, Industry and Government, A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1992, 61–70.
Arbel, A. and L. G. Vargas, “Preference Simulation and Preference Programming: Robustness Issues in Priority Derivation,” European Journal of Operational Research, 69 (1993), 200–209.
Barzilai, J. and B. Golani, “AHP Rank Reversal, Normalization and Aggregation,” INFOR, 32, 1994, 57–63.
Cooper, C. J. and E. S. Pearson, “The Use of Confidence or Fiducial Limits Illustrated in the Case of the Binomial,” Biometrika, 26 (1934), 406–413.
Dyer, J. S., “Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” Management Science, 36, 3 (1990), 249–258.
Moreno-Jimenez, J. M. and L. G. Vargas, “A Probabilistic Study of the Preference Structures in the Analytic Hierarchy Process with Interval Judgments,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17 (1993), 73–81.
Neter, J., W. Wasserman and M. H. Kutner, Applied Linear Statistical Models, Second Edition, Irwin, New York, NY 1985.
Saaty, T. L., The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, 1980.
Saaty, T. L., “An Exposition of the AHP in Reply to the Paper ‘Remarks on the Analytic Hierarchy Process,’” Management Science, 36, 3 (1990), 259–268.
Saaty, T. L. and L. G. Vargas, “Uncertainty and Rank Order in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, 32 (1987), 107–117.
Salo, A. A., “Inconsistency Analysis by Approximately Specified Priorities,” Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 17 (1993), 123–133.
Salo, A. A. and R. P. Hamalainen, “Processing Interval Judgments in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” inMultiple Criteria Decision Making: Proceedings of the IXth International Conference: Theory and Applications in Business, Industry and Government, A. Goicoechea, L. Duckstein and S. Zionts (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, NY, 1992, 359–372.
Salo, A. A. and R. P. Hamalainen, “Preference Assessment by Imprecise Ration Statements,” Operations Research, 40 (1992), 1053–1061.
Salo, A. A. and R. P. Hamalainen, “Preference Programming Through Approximate Ratio Comparisons,” European Journal of Operational Research, 82, 1994, 458–475.
Schoner, B., W. C. Wedley and E. U. Choo, “A Rejoinder to Forman on AHP, With Emphasis on the Requirements of Composite Ratio Scales,” Decision Sciences, 23, 1992, 509–517.
Schoner, B., W. C. Wedley and E. U. Choo, “A Unified Approach to AHP with Linking Pins,” European Journal of Operational Research, 64, 1993, 384–392.
Stam and Duarte Silva, “Stochastic Judgments in the AHP: The Measurement of Rank Reversal Probabilities, Decision Sciences, 28, 1997, 655–688.
Vargas, L. G., “Reciprocal Matrices with Random Coefficients,” Mathematical Modelling, 3 (1982), 69–81.
Zahir, M. S., “Incorporating the Uncertainty of Decision Judgements in the Analytic Hierarchy Process,” European Journal of Operational Research, 53 (1991), 206–216.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1998 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stam, A., Silva, A.P.D. (1998). The Stability of AHP Rankings in the Presence of Stochastic Paired Comparisons. In: Stewart, T.J., van den Honert, R.C. (eds) Trends in Multicriteria Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 465. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45772-2_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-64741-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45772-2
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive