Skip to main content

Resolving Braess’s Paradox in Random Networks

  • Conference paper
Web and Internet Economics (WINE 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8289))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Braess’s paradox states that removing a part of a network may improve the players’ latency at equilibrium. In this work, we study the approximability of the best subnetwork problem for the class of random \(\mathcal{G}_{n,p}\) instances proven prone to Braess’s paradox by (Roughgarden and Valiant, RSA 2010) and (Chung and Young, WINE 2010). Our main contribution is a polynomial-time approximation-preserving reduction of the best subnetwork problem for such instances to the corresponding problem in a simplified network where all neighbors of s and t are directly connected by 0 latency edges. Building on this, we obtain an approximation scheme that for any constant ε > 0 and with high probability, computes a subnetwork and an ε-Nash flow with maximum latency at most (1 + ε)L  ∗  + ε, where L  ∗  is the equilibrium latency of the best subnetwork. Our approximation scheme runs in polynomial time if the random network has average degree O(poly(ln n)) and the traffic rate is O(poly(ln ln n)), and in quasipolynomial time for average degrees up to o(n) and traffic rates of O(poly(ln n)).

This research was supported by the project Algorithmic Game Theory, co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund - ESF) and Greek national funds, through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF) - Research Funding Program: THALES, investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund, by the ERC project RIMACO, and by the EU FP7/2007-13 (DG INFSO G4-ICT for Transport) under Grant Agreement no. 288094 (Project eCompass).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Althöfer, I.: On Sparse Approximations to Randomized Strategies and Convex Combinations. Linear Algebra and Applications 99, 339–355 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bollobás, B.: Random Graphs, 2nd edn. Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, vol. 73. Cambridge University Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Braess, D.: Über ein paradox aus der Verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung 12, 258–268 (1968)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chung, F., Young, S.J.: Braess’s paradox in large sparse graphs. In: Saberi, A. (ed.) WINE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6484, pp. 194–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chung, F., Young, S.J., Zhao, W.: Braess’s paradox in expanders. Random Structures and Algorithms 41(4), 451–468 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Fotakis, D., Kaporis, A.C., Spirakis, P.G.: Efficient methods for selfish network design. Theoretical Computer Science 448, 9–20 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Kelly, F.: The mathematics of traffic in networks. In: Gowers, T., Green, J., Leader, I. (eds.) The Princeton Companion to Mathematics. Princeton University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin, H.C., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, É., Walkover, A.: Stronger bounds on Braess’s paradox and the maximum latency of selfish routing. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 25(4), 1667–1686 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lipton, R.J., Markakis, E., Mehta, A.: Playing Large Games Using Simple Strategies. In: Proc. of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC 2003), pp. 36–41 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lipton, R.J., Young, N.E.: Simple Strategies for Large Zero-Sum Games with Applications to Complexity Theory. In: Proc. of the 26th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1994), pp. 734–740 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Milchtaich, I.: Network Topology and the Efficiency of Equilibrium. Games and Economic Behavior 57, 321–346 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagurney, A., Boyce, D.: Preface to “On a Paradox of Traffic Planning”. Transportation Science 39(4), 443–445 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Pas, E.I., Principio, S.L.: Braess’s paradox: Some new insights. Transportation Research Part B 31(3), 265–276 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Roughgarden, T.: Selfish Routing and the Price of Anarchy. MIT Press (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Roughgarden, T.: On the Severity of Braess’s Paradox: Designing Networks for Selfish Users is Hard. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 72(5), 922–953 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinberg, R., Zangwill, W.I.: The prevalence of Braess’ paradox. Transportation Science 17(3), 301–318 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Valiant, G., Roughgarden, T.: Braess’s paradox in large random graphs. Random Structures and Algorithms 37(4), 495–515 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Végh, L.A.: Strongly polynomial algorithm for a class of minimum-cost flow problems with separable convex objectives. In: Proc. of the 44th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2012), pp. 27–40 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fotakis, D., Kaporis, A.C., Lianeas, T., Spirakis, P.G. (2013). Resolving Braess’s Paradox in Random Networks. In: Chen, Y., Immorlica, N. (eds) Web and Internet Economics. WINE 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8289. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45046-4_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45045-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45046-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics