Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Theoretical Model of User Engagement in Crowdsourcing

  • Conference paper
Collaboration and Technology (CRIWG 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8224))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Social media technology has enabled virtual collaborative environments where people actively interact, share knowledge, coordinate activities, solve problems, co-create value, and innovate. Organizations have begun to leverage approaches and technologies to involve numerous people from outside their boundaries to perform organizational tasks. Despite the success and popularity of this ‘crowdsourcing’ phenomenon, there appears to be a distinct gap in the literature regarding the empirical evaluation of the factors involved in a crowdsourcing user experience. This paper aims to fill this void by proposing a theoretical model of the antecedents and their relationships for crowdsourcing user engagement. It is defined as the quality of effort online users devote to collaboration activities that contribute directly to desired outcomes. Drawing from research in psychology and IS, we identify three critical elements that precede crowdsourcing user engagement: personal interest in topic, goal clarity, and motivation to contribute. This paper examines the theoretical basis of these variables of interest in detail, derives a causal model of their interrelationships, and identifies future plans for model testing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitamurto, T., Leiponen, A., Tee, R.: The Promise of Idea Crowdsourcing–Benefits, Contexts, Limitations. Nokia Ideasproject White Paper (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander, P.A., Jetton, T.: Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In: Kamil, M.L., Mosenthal, P.B., Pearson, P.D., Barr, R. (eds.) Handbook of Reading Research, vol. 3, pp. 285–310. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Antonison, M.: Evaluation of work engagement as a measure of psychological well-being from work motivation, Dissertation Abstracts International, p. 72 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Attfield, S., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Piwowarski, B.: Towards a science of user engagement (Position Paper). In: WSDM Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baron, R.M., Kenny, D.A.: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 1173–1182 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baroudi, J.J., Orlikowski, W.J.: The problem of statistical power in MIS research. MIS Quarterly, 87–106 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Belleamme, P., Lambert, T., Schwienbacher, A.: Crowdfunding: Tapping the Right Crowd. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the French Finance Association, AFFI (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bipp, T., Kleingeld, A.: Goal-setting in practice: The effects of personality and perceptions of the goal-setting process on job satisfaction and goal commitment. Personnel Review 40, 306–323 (2011), doi:10.1108/00483481111118630

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bobek, D., Zaff, J., Li, Y., Lerner, M.: Cognitive, emotional, and behavioral components of civic action: Towards an integrated measure of civic engagement. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, 615–627 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bommert, B.: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. International Public Management Review 11, 15–33 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bonabeau, E.: Decisions 2.0: the power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review 50, 45–52 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brabham, D.C.: Moving the crowd at istock photo: The composition of the crowd and motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. First Monday 13 (2008), http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/viewArticle/2159/1969 (accessed January 2013)

  13. Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects. Planning Theory 8, 242–262 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Brito, J.: Improving government transparency online. Public Manager 37, 22–27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Casal, D.P.: Crowdsourcing the Corpus: Using Collective Intelligence as a Method for Composition. Leonardo Music Journal 21, 25–28 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chandler, D., Kapelner, A.: Breaking monotony with meaning: Motivation in crowdsourcing markets. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.003

  17. Chen, H., Nilan, M.: Digital format of experience sampling method – transformation, implementation and assessment. In: AMCIS, pp. 692–694 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Coates, H.: The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in Higher Education 11, 25–36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox, L.P.: Truth in Crowdsourcing. IEEE Journal on Security and Privacy 9, 74–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis, S., Wiedenbeck, S.: The mediating effects of intrinsic motivation, ease of use and usefulness perceptions on performance in first-time and subsequent computer users. Interacting with Computers 13, 549–580 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M.: The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality 19, 109–134 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Doan, A., Ramakrishnan, R., Halevy, A.: Crowdsourcing Systems on the World-Wide Web. CACM 54, 86–96 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Dubach, E., Muhdi, L., Stöcklin, D., Michahelles, F.: Crowdsourcing for “Kiosk of the Future” – A Retail Store Case Study. In: Proceedings of AMCIS 2011 (2011), http://aisel.aisnet.org/amcis2011_submissions/324/ (retrieved October 4, 2012)

  24. Estellés-Arolas, E., González Ladrón-de-Guevara, F.: Towards an integrated crowdsourcing definition. Journal of Information Science 38, 189–200 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fitt, V.A.: Crowdsourcing the News: News Organization Liability for iReporters. William Mitchell Law Review 37, 1839–1867 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Flowerday, T., Schraw, G., Stevens, J.: The role of choice and interest in reader engagement. Journal of Experimental Education 72, 93–114 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guo, Y.M., Poole, M.S.: Antecedents of flow in online shopping: a test of alternative models. Information Systems Journal 19, 369–390 (2009), doi:10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00292.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hansson, A., Anderzén, I.: Goal clarity as an instrument for improved organizational wellbeing in the Church of Sweden. Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation 33, 53–58 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heer, J., Bostok, M.: Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using Mechanical Turk to assess visualization design. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2010, pp. 203–212 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hidi, S., Baird, W.: Interestingness-A neglected variable in discourse processing. Cognitive Science 10, 179–194 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hidi, S.: Interest and its contribution as a mental resource for learning. Review of Educational Research 60, 549–572 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ho, S.S., Lee, W., Hameed, S.S.: Muslim surfers on the internet: Using the theory of planned behavior to examine factors influencing engagement in online religious activities. New Media and Society 10, 93–113 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Howe, J.: Crowdsourcing: A Definition (2006), http://www.crowdsourcing.com/cs/2006/06/crowdsourcing_a.html (accessed May 2013)

  34. Hu, J., Liden, R.C.: Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology 96, 851–862 (2011), doi:10.1037/a0022465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kleinginna Jr., P.R., Kleinginna, A.M.: A categorized list of motivation definitions, with a suggestion for a consensual definition. Motivation and Emotion 5, 263–291 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krapp, A., Hidi, S., Renninger, K.A.: Interest, learning, and development. In: Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A. (eds.) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp. 3–25. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Laczniak, R.N., Muehling, D.D.: The Relationship between Experimental Manipulations and Tests of Theory in an Advertising Message Involvement Context. Journal of Advertising 22, 59–74 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lehmann, J., Lalmas, M., Yom-Tov, E., Dupret, G.: Models of user engagement. In: Masthoff, J., Mobasher, B., Desmarais, M.C., Nkambou, R. (eds.) UMAP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7379, pp. 164–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Lin, H.F.: Understanding behavioral intention to participate in virtual communities. Cyberpsychology and Behavior: The Impact of the Internet, Multimedia and Virtual Reality on Behavior and Society 9, 540–547 (2006), doi:10.1089/cpb.2006.9.540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Ludwig, T.D., Frazier, C.B.: Employee Engagement and Organizational Behavior Management. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 32, 75–82 (2012), doi:10.1080/01608061.2011.619439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Macey, W.H., Schneider, B.: The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1(1), 3–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Meece, J.L., Blumenfeld, P.C., Hoyle, R.H.: Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 514–523 (1988), doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E., Vandenberghe, C.: Employee Commitment and Motivation: A Conceptual Analysis and Integrative Model. Journal of Applied Psychology 89, 991–1007 (2004), doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mitchell, T.R.: Motivation: New directions for theory. Academy of Management Review 7, 80–88 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Nam, T.: The Wisdom of Crowds in Government 2.0: Information Paradigm Evolution toward Wiki-Government. In: AMCIS 2010 Proceedings (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Norman, T.C., Bountra, C., Edwards, A.M., Yamamoto, K.R., Friend, S.H.: Leveraging Crowdsourcing to Facilitate the Discovery of New Medicines. Science Translational Medicine 3 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Pasek, J., Kenski, K., Romer, D., Jamieson, K.H.: America’s youth and community engagement: How use of mass media is related to civic activity and political awareness in 14- to 22-year-olds. Communication Research 33, 115–135 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Pedersen, J., Kocsis, D., Tripathi, A., Tarrell, A., Weerakoon, A., Tahmasbi, N., Xiong, J., Deng, W., Oh, O., De Vreede, G.J.: Foundations of Crowdsourcing: A Review of IS Research. In: Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pinder, C.C.: Motivation in work organizations. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Preacher, K.J., Leonardelli, G.J.: Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests (Computer software) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Rogstadius, J., Kostakos, V., Kittur, A., Smus, B., Laredo, J., Vukovic, M.: An assessment of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on task performance in crowdsourcing markets. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Barcelona, Spain (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Ryan, R.M., Deci, E.L.: Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist 55, 68–78 (2000), doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Ryan, R.M., Stiller, J.: The social contexts of internalization: Parent and teacher influences on autonomy, motivation and learning. In: Pintrich, P.R., Maher, M.L. (eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement, vol. 7, pp. 115–149. JAI Press, Greenwich (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Saks, A.M.: Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology 21, 600–619 (2006), doi:10.1108/02683940610690169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Sawyer, J.E.: Goal and process clarity: Specification of multiple constructs of role ambiguity and a structural equation model of their antecedents and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology 77, 130–142 (1992), doi:10.1037/0021-9010.77.2.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Saxton, G., Oh, O., Kishore, R.: Rules of Crowdsourcing: Models, Issues, and Systems of Control. Information Systems Management 30, 1–13 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Schiefele, U.: The influence of topic interest, prior knowledge, and cognitive capabilities on text comprehension. In: Pieters, J.M., Breuer, K., Simons, P.R.J. (eds.) Learning Environments, pp. 323–338. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  58. Schiefele, U.: Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist 26, 299–324 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Schiefele, U.: Topic interest, text representation, and quality of experience. Contemporary Educational Psychology 21, 3–18 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Schiefele, U.: Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies Reading 3, 257–280 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Schiefele, U., Krapp, A.: Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences 8, 141–160 (1996), doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90030-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Schraw, G.: Situational interest in literary text. Contemporary Education Psychologist 22, 436–456 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Schraw, G., Lehman, S.: Situational interest: A review of the literature and directions for future research. Educational Psychology Review 13, 23–53 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Schraw, G., Bruning, R., Svoboda, C.: Sources of situational interest. Journal of Reading Behavior 27, 1–17 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  65. Surowiecki, J.: The wisdom of crowds: Why the many are smarter than the few and how collective wisdom shapes business, economies, societies, and nations. Doubleday, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  66. Tobias, S.: Interest, prior knowledge, and learning. Review of Educational Research 64, 37–54 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Towers, P.: Working today: Understanding what drives employee engagement. Towers Perrin Talent Report (2003), http://www.towersperrin. com/tp/getwebcachedoc?webc=hrs/usa/2003/200309/talent_2003.pdf (retrieved)

    Google Scholar 

  68. van Schaik, P., Ling, J.: Using on-line surveys to measure three key constructs of the quality of human–computer interaction in web sites: psychometric properties and implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 545–567 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vukovic, M.: Crowdsourcing for enterprises. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Congress on Services – I, pp. 686–692. IEEE Computer Society (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  70. Wade, S.E.: How interest affects learning from text. In: Renninger, A., Hidi, S., Krapp, A. (eds.) The Role of Interest in Learning and Development, pp. 255–277. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  71. Wade, S.E., Buxton, W.M., Kelly, M.: Using think-alouds to examine reader–text interest. Reading Research Quarterly 34, 194–216 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Walker, C.O., Greene, B.A., Mansell, R.A.: Identification with academics, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation and self-efficacy as predictors of cognitive engagement. Learning and Individual Differences 16, 1–12 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Zheng, H., Li, D., Hou, W.: Task design, motivation, and participation in crowdsourcing contests. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 15, 57–88 (2011), doi:10.2753/JEC1086-4415150402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Zyngier, D.: (Re) conceptualizing student engagement: Doing education not doing time. Teaching and Teacher Education 24, 1765–1776 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Center for Collaboration Science, University of Nebraska at Omaha, USA

    Triparna de Vreede, Cuong Nguyen, Gert-Jan de Vreede, Onook Oh & Roni Reiter-Palmon

  2. Telecom Ecole de Management Institut Mines-Telecom, France

    Imed Boughzala

Authors
  1. Triparna de Vreede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Cuong Nguyen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gert-Jan de Vreede
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Imed Boughzala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Onook Oh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roni Reiter-Palmon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Victoria University of Wellington, 6140, Wellington, New Zealand

    Pedro Antunes  & Allan Sylvester  & 

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of São Paulo (USP), 05508-070, São Paulo, Brazil

    Marco Aurélio Gerosa

  3. Department of Computer Science, University of Saskatchewan, S7N 5C9, Saskatoon, Canada

    Julita Vassileva

  4. University of Nebraska at Omaha, 69182, Omaha, NE, USA

    Gert-Jan de Vreede

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

de Vreede, T., Nguyen, C., de Vreede, GJ., Boughzala, I., Oh, O., Reiter-Palmon, R. (2013). A Theoretical Model of User Engagement in Crowdsourcing. In: Antunes, P., Gerosa, M.A., Sylvester, A., Vassileva, J., de Vreede, GJ. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8224. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41346-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41347-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation