Skip to main content

Which User Interactions Predict Levels of Expertise in Work-Integrated Learning?

  • Conference paper
Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact (EC-TEL 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8095))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Predicting knowledge levels from user’s implicit interactions with an adaptive system is a difficult task, particularly in learning systems that are used in the context of daily work tasks. We have collected interactions of six persons working with the adaptive work-integrated learning system APOSDLE over a period of two months to find out whether naturally occurring interactions with the system can be used to predict their level of expertise. One set of interactions is based on the tasks they performed, the other on a number of additional Knowledge Indicating Events (KIE). We find that the addition of KIE significantly improves the prediction as compared to using tasks only. Both approaches are superior to a model that uses only the frequencies of events.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brusilovsky, P., Millán, E.: User Models for Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Educational Systems. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) Adaptive Web 2007. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 3–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Ley, T., Kump, B., Albert, D.: A methodology for eliciting, modelling, and evaluating expert knowledge for an adaptive work-integrated learning system. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68, 185–208 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lindstaedt, S., Kump, B., Beham, G., Pammer, V., Ley, T., Dotan, A., de Hoog, R.: Providing varying degrees of guidance for work-integrated learning. In: Wolpers, M., Kirschner, P.A., Scheffel, M., Lindstaedt, S., Dimitrova, V. (eds.) EC-TEL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6383, pp. 213–228. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindstaedt, S.N., Beham, G., Kump, B., Ley, T.: Getting to know your user - Unobtrusive user model maintenance within work-integrated learning environments. In: Cress, U., Dimitrova, V., Specht, M. (eds.) EC-TEL 2009. LNCS, vol. 5794, pp. 73–87. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Kump, B., Seifert, C., Beham, G., Lindstaedt, S.N., Ley, T.: Seeing what the system thinks you know. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, LAK 2012, pp. 153–157. ACM Press, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Vassileva, J. (eds.): Adaptive hypertext and hypermedia. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Poulson, M.C., Richardson, J.J. (eds.): Foundations of intelligent tutoring systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Desmarais, M.C., Baker, R.S.J.: A review of recent advances in learner and skill modeling in intelligent learning environments. User Modeling and User-adapted Interaction 22, 9–38 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A.T., Lewis, M.W.: Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence 42, 7–49 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter, S., Anderson, J.R., Koedinger, K.R., Corbett, A.T.: Cognitive tutor: Applied research in mathematics education. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 14, 249–255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitrovic, A.: Fifteen years of constraint-based tutors: What we have achieved and where we are going. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 22, 39–72 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Heller, J., Steiner, C., Hockemeyer, C., Albert, D.: Competence-based knowledge structures for personalised learning. International Journal on E-Learning 5, 75–88 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Conati, C., Gertner, A.S., VanLehn, K.: Using Bayesian Networks to Manage Uncertainty in Student Modeling. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 12, 371–417 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. De Bra, P., Aroyo, L., Cristea, A.: Adaptive web-based educational hypermedia. In: Web Dynamics: Adapting to Change in Content, Size, Topology and Use, pp. 387–410 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Limongelli, C., Sciarrone, F., Temperini, M., Vaste, G.: Adaptive learning with the LS-Plan dystem: A field evaluation. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 2, 203–215 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. De Bra, P., Smits, D., Stash, N.: The Design of AHA? In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Odense, Denmark, p. 133 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Brusilovsky, P., Schwarz, E., Weber, G.: ELM-ART: An intelligent tutoring system on World Wide Web. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G., Lesgold, A. (eds.) ITS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1086, pp. 261–269. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Brusilovsky, P.: KnowledgeTree: A distributed architecture for adaptive E-Learning. In: WWW 2004, New York, USA, May 17-22, pp. 104–113 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kay, J., Kummerfeld, B., Lauder, P.: Personis: A server for user models. In: De Bra, P., Brusilovsky, P., Conejo, R. (eds.) AH 2002. LNCS, vol. 2347, pp. 203–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Augustin, T., Hockemeyer, C., Kickmeier-Rust, M.D., Albert, D.: Individualized skill assessment in digital learning games: Basic definitions and mathematical formalism. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 4, 138–148 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Linton, F., Schaefer, H.-P.: Recommender systems for learning: Building user and expert models through long-term observation of application use. User Modeling and UserAdapted Interaction 10, 181–208 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Happel, H.-J., Maalej, W.: Potentials and challenges of recommendation systems for software development. In: Proceedings of the 2008 International Workshop on Recommendation Systems for Software Engineering, RSSE 2008, vol. 11. ACM Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ley, T., Ulbrich, A., Scheir, P., Lindstaedt, S.N., Kump, B., Albert, D.: Modelling competencies for supporting work-integrated learning in knowledge work. Journal of Knowledge Management 12, 31–47 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ley, T., Kump, B., Gerdenitsch, C.: Scaffolding Self-directed Learning with Personalized Learning Goal Recommendations. In: De Bra, P., Kobsa, A., Chin, D. (eds.) UMAP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6075, pp. 75–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Brusilovsky, P., Cooper, D.W.: Domain, task, and user models for an adaptive hypermedia performance support system. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2002, vol. 23. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mislevy, R.J., Riconscente, M.M.: Evidence-centered assessment design. In: Downing, S.M., Haladyna, T.M. (eds.) Handbook of Test Development, pp. 61–90. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lepsinger, R., Lucia, A.D.: The art and science of 360 degree feedback. John Wiley & Sons (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hoffman, C., Nathan, B., Holden, L.: A comparison of validation criteria: Objective versus subjective performance measures and self- versus supervisor ratings. Personnel Psychology 44, 601–619 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muellerbuchof, R., Zehrt, P.: Vergleich subjektiver und objektiver Messverfahren für die Bestimmung von Methodenkompetenz - am Beispiel der Kompetenzmessung bei technischem Fachpersonal. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 48, 132–138 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wild, F., Haley, D., Bülow, K.: Using latent-semantic analysis and network analysis for monitoring conceptual development. Journal for Language Technology and Computational Linguistics 26, 9–21 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Harris, M.M., Schaubroeck, J.: A meta-analysis of self-supervisor, self-peer, and peer-supervisor ratings. Personell Psychology 41, 43–62 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Conway, J.M., Huffcutt, A.I.: Psychometric properties of multisource performance ratings: A meta-analysis of subordinate, supervisor, peer, and self-ratings. Human Performance 10, 331–360 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ley, T., Kump, B. (2013). Which User Interactions Predict Levels of Expertise in Work-Integrated Learning?. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds) Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact. EC-TEL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40813-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40814-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics