Skip to main content

Computing the Grounded Semantics in all the Subgraphs of an Argumentation Framework: An Empirical Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems (CLIMA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8143))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Given an argumentation framework AF = (Ar, R) - with Ar a finite set of arguments and R ⊆ Ar ×Ar - the attack relation identifying the graph G - we study how the grounded labelling of a generic argument a εAr varies in all the subgraphs of G Since this is an intractable problem of above-polynomial complexity, we present two non-naïve algorithms to find the set of all the subgraphs where the grounded semantic assigns to argument a specific label l ε{in, out, undec}. We report the results of a series of empirical tests over graphs of increasing complexity. The value of researching the above problem is two-fold. First, knowing how an argument behaves in all the subgraphs represents strategic information for arguing agents. Second, the algorithms can be applied to the computation of the recently introduced probabilistic argumentation frameworks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dung, P.: On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games. Artificial Intelligence 77, 321–357 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Dung, P., Thang, P.: Towards (Probabilistic) Argumentation for Jury-based Dispute Resolution. In: COMMA 2010, pp. 171–182. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Li, H., Oren, N., Norman, T.J.: Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks. In: 1st TAFA, JICAI 2011, Barcellona, Spain (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baroni, P., Caminada, M., Giacomin, M.: An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Eng. Review 26(4), 365–410 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dunne, P.E., Wooldridge, M.: Complexity of abstract argumentation. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 85–104. Springer US (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hunter, A.: A probabilistic approach to modeling uncertain logical arguments. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 54(1), 47–81 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Thimm, M.: Probabilistic Semantics for Abstract Argumentation. In: Proceedings. of 20th European Conference of Artificial Intelligence, pp. 750–755. IOS Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Boella, G., Kaci, S., van der Torre, L.: Dynamics in argumentation with single extensions: Abstraction principles and the grounded extension. In: Sossai, C., Chemello, G. (eds.) ECSQARU 2009. LNCS, vol. 5590, pp. 107–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Baumann, R.: Splitting an argumentation framework. In: Delgrande, J.P., Faber, W. (eds.) LPNMR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6645, pp. 40–53. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Charwat, G.: Tree-Decomposition based Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation Frameworks. Thesis, Vienna University of Technology (February 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dondio, P.: Probabilistic Argumentation Frameworks: Basic Properties and Computation, Highlights on Practical Applications of Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 263–279. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cayrol, C., Dupin, F., Lagasquie-Schiex, M.: Change in abstract argumentation frameworks: adding an argument. Journal of Artificial Intellgence Research 38(1), 49–84 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Nofal, S., Dunne, P.E., Atkinson, K.: Towards Experimental Algorithms for Abstract Argumentation. In: COMMA, pp. 217–228 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Modgil, S., Caminada, M.: Proof theories and algorithms for abstract argumentation frameworks. In: Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 105–129. Springer US (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dondio, P. (2013). Computing the Grounded Semantics in all the Subgraphs of an Argumentation Framework: An Empirical Evaluation. In: Leite, J., Son, T.C., Torroni, P., van der Torre, L., Woltran, S. (eds) Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems. CLIMA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8143. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40624-9_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40623-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40624-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics