Skip to main content

On the Complexity of Verifying Regular Properties on Flat Counter Systems,

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages, and Programming (ICALP 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7966))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Among the approximation methods for the verification of counter systems, one of them consists in model-checking their flat unfoldings. Unfortunately, the complexity characterization of model-checking problems for such operational models is not always well studied except for reachability queries or for Past LTL. In this paper, we characterize the complexity of model-checking problems on flat counter systems for the specification languages including first-order logic, linear mu-calculus, infinite automata, and related formalisms. Our results span different complexity classes (mainly from PTime to PSpace) and they apply to languages in which arithmetical constraints on counter values are systematically allowed. As far as the proof techniques are concerned, we provide a uniform approach that focuses on the main issues.

Work partially supported by the EU Seventh Framework Programme under grant agreement No. PIOF-GA-2011-301166 (DATAVERIF).

A version with proofs is available as [5].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boigelot, B.: Symbolic methods for exploring infinite state spaces. PhD thesis, Université de Liège (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bozga, M., Iosif, R., Konečný, F.: Fast acceleration of ultimately periodic relations. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 227–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Comon, H., Jurski, Y.: Multiple counter automata, safety analysis and PA. In: Vardi, M.Y. (ed.) CAV 1998. LNCS, vol. 1427, pp. 268–279. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Demri, S., Dhar, A.K., Sangnier, A.: Taming Past LTL and Flat Counter Systems. In: Gramlich, B., Miller, D., Sattler, U. (eds.) IJCAR 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7364, pp. 179–193. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Demri, S., Dhar, A.K., Sangnier, A.: On the complexity of verifying regular properties on flat counter systems (2013), http://arxiv.org/abs/1304.6301

  6. Demri, S., Finkel, A., Goranko, V., van Drimmelen, G.: Model-checking \(\textsf{CTL}^{*}\) over flat Presburger counter systems. JANCL 20(4), 313–344 (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Finkel, A., Leroux, J.: How to compose presburger-accelerations: Applications to broadcast protocols. In: Agrawal, M., Seth, A.K. (eds.) FSTTCS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2556, pp. 145–156. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Jančar, P., Sawa, Z.: A note on emptiness for alternating finite automata with a one-letter alphabet. IPL 104(5), 164–167 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jurdziński, M.: Deciding the winner in parity games is in UP ∩ co-UP. IPL 68(3), 119–124 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kuhtz, L., Finkbeiner, B.: Weak kripke structures and LTL. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 419–433. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.: Weak alternating automata are not that weak. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 2(3), 408–429 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kučera, A., Strejček, J.: The stuttering principle revisited. Acta Informatica 41(7-8), 415–434 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Laroussinie, F., Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Temporal logic with forgettable past. In: LICS 2002, pp. 383–392. IEEE (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Leroux, J., Sutre, G.: Flat counter systems are everywhere! In: Peled, D.A., Tsay, Y.-K. (eds.) ATVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3707, pp. 489–503. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Model checking a path. In: Amadio, R.M., Lugiez, D. (eds.) CONCUR 2003. LNCS, vol. 2761, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Markey, N., Schnoebelen, P.: Mu-calculus path checking. IPL 97(6) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Minsky, M.: Computation, Finite and Infinite Machines. Prentice Hall (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miyano, S., Hayashi, T.: Alternating finite automata on ω-words. Theor. Comput. Sci. 32, 321–330 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Piterman, N.: Extending temporal logic with ω-automata. Master’s thesis, The Weizmann Institute of Science (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pottier, L.: Minimal Solutions of Linear Diophantine Systems: Bounds and Algorithms. In: Book, R.V. (ed.) RTA 1991. LNCS, vol. 488, pp. 162–173. Springer, Heidelberg (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Sistla, A., Clarke, E.: The complexity of propositional linear temporal logic. JACM 32(3), 733–749 (1985)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Stockmeyer, L.J.: The complexity of decision problems in automata and logic. PhD thesis, MIT (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Vardi, M.: A temporal fixpoint calculus. In: POPL 1988, pp. 250–259. ACM (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Vardi, M., Wolper, P.: Reasoning about infinite computations. I&C 115 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wolper, P.: Temporal logic can be more expressive. I&C 56, 72–99 (1983)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Demri, S., Dhar, A.K., Sangnier, A. (2013). On the Complexity of Verifying Regular Properties on Flat Counter Systems,. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds) Automata, Languages, and Programming. ICALP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7966. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39212-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39212-2_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39211-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39212-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics