Skip to main content

A Fresh Approach to Learning Register Automata

  • Conference paper
Developments in Language Theory (DLT 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7907))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper provides an Angluin-style learning algorithm for a class of register automata supporting the notion of fresh data values. More specifically, we introduce session automata which are well suited for modeling protocols in which sessions using fresh values are of major interest, like in security protocols or ad-hoc networks. We show that session automata (i)have an expressiveness partly extending, partly reducing that of register automata, (ii) admit a symbolic regular representation, and (iii) have a decidable equivalence and model-checking problem (unlike register automata).Using these results, we establish a learning algorithm to infer session automata through membership and equivalence queries. Finally, we strengthen the robustness of our automaton by its characterization in monadic second-order logic.

This work is partially supported by EGIDE/DAAD-Procope (LeMon).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarts, F., Heidarian, F., Kuppens, H., Olsen, P., Vaandrager, F.W.: Automata learning through counterexample guided abstraction refinement. In: Giannakopoulou, D., Méry, D. (eds.) FM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7436, pp. 10–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D.: Learning regular sets from queries and counterexamples. Information and Computation 75(2), 87–106 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg, T., Grinchtein, O., Jonsson, B., Leucker, M., Raffelt, H., Steffen, B.: On the correspondence between conformance testing and regular inference. In: Cerioli, M. (ed.) FASE 2005. LNCS, vol. 3442, pp. 175–189. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg, T., Raffelt, H.: Model Checking. In: Broy, M., Jonsson, B., Katoen, J.-P., Leucker, M., Pretschner, A. (eds.) Model-Based Testing of Reactive Systems. LNCS, vol. 3472, pp. 557–603. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Björklund, H., Schwentick, T.: On notions of regularity for data languages. Theoretical Computer Science 411(4-5), 702–715 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Bojanczyk, M., David, C., Muscholl, A., Schwentick, T., Segoufin, L.: Two-variable logic on data words. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12(4), 27 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Bollig, B., Cyriac, A., Gastin, P., Narayan Kumar, K.: Model checking languages of data words. In: Birkedal, L. (ed.) FOSSACS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7213, pp. 391–405. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bollig, B., Katoen, J.-P., Kern, C., Leucker, M., Neider, D., Piegdon, D.R.: libalf: The automata learning framework. In: Touili, T., Cook, B., Jackson, P. (eds.) CAV 2010. LNCS, vol. 6174, pp. 360–364. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cassel, S., Howar, F., Jonsson, B., Merten, M., Steffen, B.: A succinct canonical register automaton model. In: Bultan, T., Hsiung, P.-A. (eds.) ATVA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6996, pp. 366–380. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Cobleigh, J.M., Giannakopoulou, D., Păsăreanu, C.S.: Learning assumptions for compositional verification. In: Garavel, H., Hatcliff, J. (eds.) TACAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2619, pp. 331–346. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Colcombet, T., Ley, C., Puppis, G.: On the use of guards for logics with data. In: Murlak, F., Sankowski, P. (eds.) MFCS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6907, pp. 243–255. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Giannakopoulou, D., Magee, J.: Fluent model checking for event-based systems. In: ESEC / SIGSOFT FSE, pp. 257–266. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Habermehl, P., Vojnar, T.: Regular Model Checking Using Inference of Regular Languages. In: INFINITY 2004. ENTCS, vol. 138, pp. 21–36. Elsevier (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Howar, F., Steffen, B., Jonsson, B., Cassel, S.: Inferring canonical register automata. In: Kuncak, V., Rybalchenko, A. (eds.) VMCAI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7148, pp. 251–266. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Jonsson, B.: Learning of automata models extended with data. In: Bernardo, M., Issarny, V. (eds.) SFM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6659, pp. 327–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kaminski, M., Francez, N.: Finite-memory automata. Theoretical Computer Science 134(2), 329–363 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kürtz, K.O., Küsters, R., Wilke, T.: Selecting theories and nonce generation for recursive protocols. In: FMSE, pp. 61–70. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leucker, M.: Learning meets verification. In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2006. LNCS, vol. 4709, pp. 127–151. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Margaria, T., Raffelt, H., Steffen, B., Leucker, M.: The LearnLib in FMICS-jETI. In: ICECCS, pp. 340–352. IEEE Computer Society Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Milner, R., Parrow, J., Walker, D.: A calculus of mobile processes, Parts I and II. Information and Computation 100, 1–77 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Neven, F., Schwentick, T., Vianu, V.: Finite state machines for strings over infinite alphabets. ACM Transactions on Computational Logic 5(3), 403–435 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Rivest, R., Schapire, R.: Inference of finite automata using homing sequences. Information and Computation 103, 299–347 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Segoufin, L.: Automata and logics for words and trees over an infinite alphabet. In: Ésik, Z. (ed.) CSL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4207, pp. 41–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Tzevelekos, N.: Fresh-register automata. In: POPL, pp. 295–306. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bollig, B., Habermehl, P., Leucker, M., Monmege, B. (2013). A Fresh Approach to Learning Register Automata. In: Béal, MP., Carton, O. (eds) Developments in Language Theory. DLT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7907. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38771-5_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38771-5_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38770-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38771-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics