Abstract
In this chapter, I explore the current moment of global discourse and its challenges for teacher education. I begin by making the case that, at an ideational level, there is indeed a global conversation of teacher education, one supported by cross-national studies, the role of national scholars and policymakers, and the emergence of global consulting (perhaps a new player in a new role). I then examine, through analysis of curriculum and teacher education student learning, how the practices of teacher education, when viewed comparatively, suggest a far more local, or regional, conversation. Finally, I consider the role of research in supporting what I see as an interaction of global and local discourses. Throughout, I am drawing on ideas of externalization (Schriewer 2000; Steiner-Khamsi 2004) and an understanding of teacher education as existing in both discursive and structural levels.
I thank Helen Aydarova, Brian DeLany, Kongji Qin, and Takayo Ogisu for their help in gathering materials, exploring the patterns discussed here, and reading drafts of this paper. Thanks go to Shi Jinghuan for thoughtful comments when the paper was presented at the First Global Teacher Education Summit, Beijing Normal University, Oct. 29, 2011. All problems with the argument are, of course, mine.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In this paper, I use the term “local” in large part to contrast with the term “global”. It is beyond the scope of this paper to interrogate the important complications and complexities of what constitutes “local”. Here, I use it to refer to national or sub-national policies, demographic and economic conditions, social expectations, cultural assumptions and educational systems or traditions.
- 2.
See as examples: Department for Education (UK) (2010); Ministry of Education (2010); Department of Basic Education (South Africa) (2011); http://www.oecd.org/document/4/0,3746,en_2649_39263231_41829700_1_1_1_1,00.html; Caldwell 2007; Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education 2010; American Association of School Administrators (2011), http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Newsroom/AFT-AASA-Framework-Prologue-042311.pdf.
- 3.
See www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=17598&tid=31552 for details.
- 4.
See http://www.bahamasemployers.org/documents/coalitionforeducation/0807educationpolicystudy.pdf for the Bahamian example.
- 5.
One notes a parallel to the business advice that the same McKinsey company gave to Enron about “get the brightest into the room”. See Gladwell (2002) for more.
- 6.
Our study considered 28 US and 21 South Korean institutions that reflected a purposive sample of nationally accredited mathematics teacher education programs from each country that reflected variations in institutional prestige and geographic location. To understand formal expectations and educational aims, we analyzed such documents as the teacher education program or department handbook and website, especially the introductions that provide overviews of goals and orientations. For more on the thinking behind this analysis as well as the sample, see Kim et al. 2011.
- 7.
These were content knowledge, pedagogical content knowledge, pedagogical knowledge, general knowledge, and field experience. For more details, see Kim et al. 2011, p. 54.
- 8.
“In terms of credit requirements, 45 % of credits are allocated to CK courses in South Korea, which is the largest proportion of the five types of courses in the country. In the United States, however, the credit requirement for CK courses is only 26 %, which is lower than the credit requirement for GK courses by 13 %” (Kim et al. 2011).
- 9.
Even though there was a larger standard deviation among U.S. programs than among South Korean ones in our data, the difference in curricular emphasis given to field-based experiences between the two countries is statistically significant.
- 10.
In the planning phase of MT21, colleagues from Italy and the UK also participated. Here and elsewhere in the paper, references to practices in these two settings come from personal communications during this planning phase of MT21 work.
- 11.
See Schmidt et al. 2011, p. 100f for discussion of this.
- 12.
Certainly some U.S. researchers and teacher education practitioners, like many European counterparts, conceptualize mathematic pedagogy as a scholarly area of inquiry and see knowledge of it as including theorized understandings. Shulman (1987) and others identify pedagogical content knowledge as a knowledge which includes theoretical understandings about the teaching of subject matter. I suggest that the presence of the U.S. discourse on pedagogical content knowledge, which entered the U.S. field only 20 years ago, in fact reflects the persistence of a longstanding approach which deems the knowledge of subject teaching to be primarily a practically-oriented one. For more, see Bloemeke and Paine 2008.
References
Akiba M, LeTendre G (2009) Improving teacher quality: the U.S. teaching force in global context. Teachers College Press, New York
Akiba M, LeTendre G, Scribner J (2007) Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educ Res 36(7):369–387
Alexander RJ (2010) “World-class schools”: Noble aspiration or globalised hokum? Comp J Comp Int Educ 40(6):801–817
American Association of School Administrators (2011) http://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Newsroom/AFT-AASA-Framework-Prologue-042311.pdf
Auguste B, Kihn P, Miller M (2010) Closing the talent gap: attracting and retaining top-third graduates to careers in teaching. McKinsey & Company, London
Bae CK (1991) Education: top reason behind rapid growth. Koreana 5(2):56–68
Baker D, LeTendre G (2005) National differences, global similarities: world culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University Press, Stanford
Barber M, Mourshed M (2007) How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company, London
Blömeke S (2011) How might we expect future teachers to teach and which relationship exists to cognitive abilities? Presentation given to the annual conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Montreal
Blömeke S, Paine L (2008) Getting the fish out of the water: considering benefits and problems of doing research on teacher education at an international level. Teach Teach Educ 24(4):2027–2037
Blömeke S, Suhl U, Kaiser G (2011) The local and the global: is there a curriculum of teacher education accepted world wide? Paper presented to the annual conference of the Comparative and International Education Society, Montreal
Caldwell B (2007) http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/rudd-has-a-long-way-to-go-to-become-the-education-prime-minister/2007/12/05/1196812821144.html
Cha Y-K (2002) Chodeung gyosa gyoyukgwajeong-ui jedo-jeok giwon mit segye-jeok hwaksan-e daehan bigyo yeongu [Institutional origins and the globalization of the primary teacher education program: A cross-national study]. Korean J Comp Educ 12(1):113–128
Commonwealth of Virginia Department of Education (2010) Race to the top application
Darling-Hammond L (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement. Educ Policy Anal Arch 8(1). http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/392
Darling-Hammond L (2010) The flat world and education. Teachers College Press, New York
Darling-Hammond L (2011) [Web log message]. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/post/darling-hammond-us-vs-highest-achieving-nations-in-education/2011/03/22/ABkNeaCB_blog.html. 23 March
Darling-Hammond L, Lieberman A (eds) (2012) Teacher education around the world: changing policies and practices. Routledge, London
De Grauwe A, Lugaz C (2011) Strengthening local actors: the path to decentralizing education. Kenya, Lesotho, Uganda. IIEP UNESCO, Paris
Department of Basic Education (South Africa) (2011) http://www.info.gov.za/speech/DynamicAction?pageid=461&sid=17598&tid=31552
Department for Education (UK) (2010) The importance of teaching: schools white paper. Department for Education, London
Dolton P, Marcenaro-Gutierrez OD (2011) If you pay peanuts do you get monkeys? A cross-country analysis of teacher pay and pupil performance. Econ Policy 26(65):5–55
Educational initiatives blog (2008) [Web log message]. http://blog.ei-india.com/2008/06/what-works-in-education-the-lessons-according-to-mckinsey/. 1 June
Eltigani H (2011). Learning from best practices to build a world-class education system. Presentation to the 1st international conference of TQM in K-12 Education Ryadh, Saudi Arabia
Friedman T (2010) Teaching for America. New York Times. http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/21/opinion/21friedman.html?_r=2&nl=todaysheadlines&emc=a212. 20 November
Gladwell M (2002). The talent myth: are smart people over-rated. The New Yorker:28–33, 22 July
Gopinathan S, Tan S, Fang Y, Devi L, Ramos C, Chao E (2008) Transforming teacher education: redefined professionals for 21st century schools. National Institute of Education, Singapore
Hanushek EA, Wolfmann L (2007) Education quality and economic growth. The World Bank, Washington, DC
Haycock K (2001) Closing the achievement gap. Educ Leadership 58(6):6–11
Irish Business and Employers Confederation (2011) Policy on the continuum of teacher education. Submission to the Teaching Council. http://www.ibec.ie/IBEC/DFB.nsf/vPages/Education_and_training~Key_issues~improving-teacher-professional-development-01-03-2011/$file/Teacher%20education_IBEC.pdf
Karpati A (2009) Teacher training and professional development. In: Fazekas K, Kollo J, Varga J (eds) Green book: for the renewal of public education in Hungary. Ecostat, Budapest, pp 203–226
Kennedy MM (2010) Attribution error and the quest for teacher quality. Educ Res 39(8):591–598
Kim RY, Ham S-H, Paine LW (2011) Knowledge expectations in mathematics teacher preparation programs in South Korea and the United States: towards international dialogue. J Teach Educ 62(1):48–61
Konig J, Blomeke S, Paine L, Schmidt W, Hsieh F (2011) General pedagogical knowledge of future middle school teachers: on the complex ecology of teacher education in the United States, Germany, and Taiwan. J Teach Educ 62(2):188–201
Kwon O-N (2004) Mathematics teacher education in Korea. Paper presented at the international congress on mathematical education (ICME-10), Copenhagen
Lauder H, Brown P, Dillabough J, Halsey AH (2006) Education, globalization and social change. Oxford University Press, London
Leung FKS (2001) In search of an East Asian identity in mathematics education. Educ Stud Math 47(1):35–51
Looney A (2010) Teacher professional identity: restoration or reset? In: Stoney SM (ed) Beyond Lisbon 2010: perspectives from research and development for education in Europe (CIDREE Yearbook 2010). NFER, Slough, pp 71–84
Ming K (2007) [Web log message]. http://educationmalaysia.blogspot.com/2007/08/consultants-ideas-to-improve-schools-in.html. 7 August
Ministry of Education (2010). http://www.moe.gov.sg/about/files/moe-corporate-brochure.pdf
Ministry of Education, People’s Republic of China (2010) Outline of China’s National plan for medium and long-term education reform and development (2010–2020). Beijing
Ministry of Education, Training, & Employment (2011) Education stabilisation plan. Cayman Islands Government. http://www.education.gov.ky/portal/page?_pageid=1408,1783320&_dad=portal&_schema=PORTAL
Obama B (2011) State of the union address. http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2011/01/25/remarks-president-state-union-address
OECD (2005) Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. OECD, Paris
OECD (2009) Creating effective teaching and learning environments: first results from TALIS. Paris
OECD (2011) Building a high quality teaching profession: lessons from around the world: Background report for the international summit on the teaching profession. OECD, Paris
Pang JS (2003) Suhakgyosa hakseup-kwa jeonmunseong sinjang-e kwanhan sogo [Mathematics teacher learning and professional development]. J Educ Res Math 13(2):143–157
Ravitch D (2009) [Web log message]. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences/2009/04/. 28 April
Ravitch D (2011) [Web log message]. http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/Bridging-Differences/2011/10/what_can_we_learn_from_finland.html. 11 October
Robinson J (1994) Social status and academic success in South Korea. Comp Educ Rev 38(4):506–530
Roth RA (1999) The role of the university in the preparation of teachers. Falmer, Philadelphia
Sanders WL, Rivers JC (1996) Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Unpublished research report, University of Tennessee-Knoxville
Schleicher A (2012) Preparing teachers and developing school leaders for the 21st century: background report for the 2nd international summit on the teaching profession. OECD, Paris
Schmidt WH et al (2007) The preparation gap: teacher education for middle school mathematics in six countries, (MT21 Report). Michigan State University Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, East Lansing
Schmidt WH, Bloemeke S, Tatto MT (2011) Teacher education matters: a study of middle school mathematics teacher preparation in six countries. Teachers College Press, New York
Schriewer J (2000) World system and interrelationship networks. In: Popkewitz T (ed) Educational knowledge: changing relationships between the state, civil society, and the educational community. SUNY Press, Albany, pp 305–344
Schriewer J, Martinez C (2004) Constructions of internationality in education. In: Steiner-Khamsi G (ed) The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Teachers College Press, New York, pp 29–53
Shulman LS (1987) Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv Educ Rev 57:1–22
Sorenson CW (1994) Success and education in South Korea. Comp Educ Rev 38(1):10–35
Steiner-Khamsi G (2004) The global politics of educational borrowing and lending. Teachers College Press, New York
Stromquist NP (2002) Education in a globalized world: the connectivity of economic power, technology, and knowledge. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Takayama K (2010) Politics of externalization in reflexive times: reinventing Japanese education reform discourses through “Finnish PISA success”. Comp Educ Rev 54(1):51–75
Tatto MT (2007) Reforming teaching globally. Symposium Books, Oxford
Tatto MT, Schwille J, Senk SL, Ingvarson L, Rowley G, Peck R et al (2012) Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 countries: findings from the IEA Teacher Education and Development Study in Mathematics (TEDS-M). IEA, Amsterdam
Tucker MS (2011) Surpassing Shanghai: an agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems. Harvard Education Press, Cambridge, MA
U.S. Department of Education (2011) Our future, our teachers: the Obama administration’s plan for teacher education reform and improvement. U.S. Department of Education, Washington, DC
Wang J, Lin E, Spalding E, Klecka C, Odell S (2011) Quality of teaching and teacher education: a kaleidoscope of notions. J Teach Educ 62(4):331–338
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Paine, L. (2013). Exploring the Interaction of Global and Local in Teacher Education: Circulating Notions of What Preparing a Good Teacher Entails. In: Zhu, X., Zeichner, K. (eds) Preparing Teachers for the 21st Century. New Frontiers of Educational Research. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36970-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36970-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36969-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36970-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)