Skip to main content

Many-Valued Logics, Fuzzy Logics and Graded Consequence: A Comparative Appraisal

  • Conference paper
Logic and Its Applications (ICLA 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7750))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper a comparative study of many-valued logics, fuzzy logics and the theory of graded consequence has been made focussing on consequence, inconsistency and sorites paradox.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bergmann, M.: An Introduction to Many-valued and Fuzzy Logic: Semantics, Algebras and Derivation Systems. Cambridge University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T.: Introduction to Inconsistency Tolerance. In: Bertossi, L., Hunter, A., Schaub, T. (eds.) Inconsistency Tolerance. LNCS, vol. 3300, pp. 1–14. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Chakraborty, M.K.: Use of fuzzy set theory in introducing graded consequence in multiple valued logic. In: Gupta, M.M., Yamakawa, T. (eds.) Fuzzy Logic in Knowledge-Based Systems, Decision and Control, pp. 247–257. Elsevier Science Publishers, B.V., North Holland (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chakraborty, M.K.: Graded Consequence: further studies. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 5(2), 127–137 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraborty, M.K., Basu, S.: Graded Consequence and some Metalogical Notions Generalized. Fundamenta Informaticae 32, 299–311 (1997)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chakraborty, M.K., Dutta, S.: Graded Consequence Revisited. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 161, 1885–1905 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chakraborty, M.K., Dutta, S.: Grade in Metalogical Notions: a Comparative Study of Fuzzy Logics. Mathware and Soft Computing (accepted)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dunn, P.E., et al.: Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems. In: Decker, Sichman, Sierra, Castelfranchi (eds.) Proc. of 8th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2009), Budapest, Hungary, May 10-15, pp. 851–858 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Edgington, D.: Vagueness by degrees. In: Keefe, R., Smith, P. (eds.) Vagueness: A Reader, pp. 294–316. MIT Press, Massachusetts (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Esteva, E., Godo, L., Noguera, C.: On Completeness results for Predicate Łukasiewicz, Product, G\(\ddot{o}\)del and Nilpotent Minimum Logics expanded with truth constants. Mathware and Soft Computing XIV(3), 233–246 (2007)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gerla, G.: Fuzzy Logic: Mathematical Tools for Approximate Reasoning. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Goguen, J.A.: The logic of inexact concepts. Synthese 19, 325–373 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gottwald, S.: An Approach to Handle Partially Sound Rules of Inference. In: Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R., Zadeh, L.A. (eds.) IPMU 1994. LNCS, vol. 945, pp. 380–388. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Hájek, P.: Metamathematics of Fuzzy Logic. Kluwer Academic Publishers (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Parikh, R.: The Problem of Vague Predicates. In: Cohen, R.S., Wartofsky, M. (eds.) Language, Logic, and Method, pp. 241–261. D. Ridel Publishing Company (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Pavelka, J.: On fuzzy logic I, II, III Zeitscher for Math. Logik und Grundlagen d. Math. 25, 45–52, 119–134, 447–464 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Pelta, C.: Wide Sets, Deep Many-valuedness and Sorites Arguments. Mathware and Soft Computing 11, 5–11 (2004)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rescher, N.: A Survey of Many-valued Logic. Mc.Graw-Hill Book Company, New York (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shoesmith, D.J., Smiley, T.J.: Multiple Conclusion Logic. Cambridge University Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tye, M.: Sorites paradoxes and the semantics of vagueness. In: Tomberlin, J.E. (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language, pp. 189–206. Ridgeview Publishing Co., Atascadero (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dutta, S., Basu, S., Chakraborty, M.K. (2013). Many-Valued Logics, Fuzzy Logics and Graded Consequence: A Comparative Appraisal. In: Lodaya, K. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7750. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36039-8_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36039-8_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-36038-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-36039-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics