Skip to main content

On Identifying User Session Boundaries in Parallel Workload Logs

  • Conference paper
Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing (JSSPP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7698))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The stream of jobs submitted to a parallel supercomputer is actually the interleaving of many streams from different users, each of which is composed of sessions. Identifying and characterizing the sessions is important in the context of workload modeling, especially if a user-based workload model is considered. Traditionally, sessions have been delimited by long think times, that is, by intervals of more than, say, 20 minutes from the termination of one job to the submittal of the next job. We show that such a definition is problematic in this context, because jobs may be extremely long. As a result of including each job’s execution in the session, we may get unrealistically long sessions, and indeed, users most probably do not always stay connected and wait for the termination of long jobs. We therefore suggest that sessions be identified based on proven user activity, namely the submittal of new jobs, regardless of how long they run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arlitt, M.: Characterizing web user sessions. Performance Evaluation Rev. 28(2), 50–56 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Downey, D., Dumais, S., Horvitz, E.: Models of searching and browsing: Languages, studies, and applications. In: 20th Intl. Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1465–1472 (January 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jann, J., Pattnaik, P., Franke, H., Wang, F., Skovira, J., Riodan, J.: Modeling of Workload in MPPs. In: Feitelson, D.G., Rudolph, L. (eds.) JSSPP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1291, pp. 95–116. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen, B.J., Spink, A., Blakely, C., Koshman, S.: Defining a session on web search engines. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. & Tech. 58(6), 862–871 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lublin, U., Feitelson, D.G.: The workload on parallel supercomputers: Modeling the characteristics of rigid jobs. J. Parallel & Distributed Comput. 63(11), 1105–1122 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Mehrzadi, D., Feitelson, D.G.: On extracting session data from activity logs. In: 5th Intl. Syst. & Storage Conf. (June 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Menascé, D.A., Almeida, V.A.F., Riedi, R., Ribeiro, F., Fonseca, R., Meira Jr., W.: A hierarchical and multiscale approach to analyze E-business workloads. Performance Evaluation 54(1), 33–57 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Montgomery, A.L., Faloutsos, C.: Identifying web browsing trends and patterns. Computer 34(7), 94–95 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Parallel workloads archive, http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/labs/parallel/workload/

  10. Schroeder, B., Wierman, A., Harchol-Balter, M.: Open versus closed: A cautionary tale. In: 3rd Networked Systems Design & Implementation, pp. 239–252 (May 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shmueli, E., Feitelson, D.G.: Using site-level modeling to evaluate the performance of parallel system schedulers. In: 14th Modeling, Anal. & Simulation of Comput. & Telecomm. Syst., pp. 167–176 (September 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Shmueli, E., Feitelson, D.G.: Uncovering the effect of system performance on user behavior from traces of parallel systems. In: 15th Modeling, Anal. & Simulation of Comput. & Telecomm. Syst., pp. 274–280 (October 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shmueli, E., Feitelson, D.G.: On simulation and design of parallel-systems schedulers: Are we doing the right thing? IEEE Trans. Parallel & Distributed Syst. 20(7), 983–996 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shriver, E., Hansen, M.: Search Session Extraction: A User Model of Searching. Tech. rep., Bell Labs (January 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Silverstein, C., Henzinger, M., Marais, H., Moricz, M.: Analysis of a very large web search engine query log. SIGIR Forum 33(1), 6–12 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zilber, J., Amit, O., Talby, D.: What is worth learning from parallel workloads? a user and session based analysis. In: 19th Intl. Conf. Supercomputing, pp. 377–386 (June 2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zakay, N., Feitelson, D.G. (2013). On Identifying User Session Boundaries in Parallel Workload Logs. In: Cirne, W., Desai, N., Frachtenberg, E., Schwiegelshohn, U. (eds) Job Scheduling Strategies for Parallel Processing. JSSPP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7698. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35867-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35867-8_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35866-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35867-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics