Skip to main content

Multicriteria Analysis to Implement Actions Leading to Coastal Dune Restoration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Restoration of Coastal Dunes

Abstract

This chapter explores the variables that can influence the success of beach and dune restoration, utilizing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the contributions of a multidisciplinary panel of recognized experts that includes ecologists, geomorphologists, anthropologists, and specialists in the restoration of coastal dunes. The criteria selected to represent the beach–dune system were chosen taking into consideration their influence on the success or failure of ecological restoration. Three levels were considered: criteria, subcriteria, and indicators. The first consists of four criteria (degree of degradation, factors that cause stress to the system, facilitators and elements that assist prioritization). The second level has ten subcriteria: morphological degradation and system fragmentation; degradation of vegetation; internal stress factors; external stress factors; abiotic factors that facilitate restoration; biotic factors that facilitate restoration; presence of species in any category of risk; proximity to protected areas; increased occurrence of floods; ecosystem services at risk). The third level consists of 38 indicators (e.g., evidence of damage by trampling of vegetation, visitor pressure, infrastructure affecting sediment dynamics, proximity of sources of propagules that can be used in restoration, among others). The relative importance of the elements of each level was calculated by the panel of experts. In a range from 0 to 1, the highest weighting (0.37) was assigned to the criterion “facilitators”. This term refers to the existence of biotic and abiotic elements necessary for restoration to take place. This criterion also includes 12 indicators (availability of pioneer plants; presence of tolerant native plant species; availability of space, orientation of the coast with respect to the waves; aeolian transport; sediment size; presence of nearby sediment sources; presence of infrastructure that alters wind dynamics, among others). The lowest weighting (0.15) was assigned to the criterion “elements that assist prioritization”. This criterion refers to those elements that are priorities for mankind that attract public attention as well as financial investment for the restoration of a given site and includes indicators such as proximity to protected areas, proximity to cultural sites and tourist areas, as well as measured ecosystem services such as the presence of human interests that are at risk of disappearing because of hurricanes or under rising sea, an abundance of hotels, and the occurrence of floods. Multi-criteria analysis is useful for making complex decisions, such as the choice of beaches and dunes for restoration. This is because it allows the problem to be addressed in an orderly manner, chooses the most representative criteria as well as assigning weighting. Furthermore, the use of this analysis allowed us to take a range of opinions into account through the contributions of a panel of experts. Inclusion of such a panel saves time while giving credibility to the decisions taken.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anders F, Leatherman S (1987) Disturbance of beach sediment by off-road vehicles. Environ Geol Water Sci 9:183–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anfuso G, Gracia F, Andres J, Sanchez F, Del Rio L, López- Aguago F (2000) Depth of disturbance in mesotidal beaches during a single tidal cycle. J Coast Res 16(2):446–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier E, Hacker S, Kennedy C, Koch E, Stier A, Silliman B (2011) The value of estuarine and coastal ecosystem services. Ecol Monogr 81(2):169–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bird B, Branch L, Miller D (2004) Effects of coastal lighting on foraging behavior of beach mice. Conserv Biol 18:1435–1439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bishop M, Peterson C, Summerson H, Lenihan H, Grabowski J (2006) Deposition and long-shore transport of dredge spoils to nourish beaches: impacts on benthic infauna of an Ebb-Tidal Delta. J Coast Res 22:530–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buick A, Paton D (1989) Impact of off-road vehicles on the nesting success of Hooded Plovers Charadrius rubricollis in the Coorong region of South Australia. Emu 89:159–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulleri F (2006) Is it time for urban ecology to include the marine realm? Trends Ecol Evol 21:658–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger J, Gochfeld M, Powers C (2007) Integrating long-term stewardship goals into the remediation process: natural resource damages and the department of energy. J Environ Manag 82:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro-Avaria C (2004) El índice de vulnerabilidad de dunas litorales: un instrumento para la gestión. Revista Geográfica de Chila Terra Australis 49:89–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley K, Ahearne J (2002) Managing the environmental legacy of U.S. nuclear-weapons production. Am Sci 90:514–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport J, Davenport J (2006) The impact of tourism and personal leisure transport on coastal environments; a review. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 67:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diefenderfer H, Sobocinski K, Thom R, May C, Borde A, Southard S, Vavrinec J, Sather N (2009) Multiscale analysis of restoration priorities for marine shoreline planning. Environ Manag 44:712–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dugan J, Hubbard D, McCrary M, Pierson M (2003) The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 58:25–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engelhard T, Withers K (1997) Biological effects of mechanical beach raking in the upper intertidal zone on Padre Island National Seashore, Texas. Technical report TAMU-CC-9706-CCS. Padre Island National Seashore, Corpus Christi, TX, 41

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Jones L, Watts B (2010) Have we neglected the societal importance of sand dunes? An ecosystem services perspective. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 20:476–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkl C, Walker H (2004) Beach nourishment. In: Schwartz M (ed) The encyclopedia of coastal science. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, pp 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Gachuz S (2009) Reecuperación de la vegetación de las dunas costeras de La Mancha, Veracruz, después de un disturbio por caminatas. Tesis de Licenciatura. Instituto de Ecología A.C., y Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana (UAM-X), 43 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Fernández J, García-Mora M, Ley C (2003) Restauración de Ecosistemas Costeros. In: Rey Benayas, JM (ed) Restauración de ecosistemas en ambientes mediterráneos. Posibilidades y limitaciones, pp 157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallego-Fernández JB, Sánchez IA, Ley C (2011) Restoration of isolated and small coastal sand dunes on the rocky coast of northern Spain. Ecol Eng 37:1822–1832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Mora M, Gallego J, Williams A, García Novo F (2001) A coastal dune vulnerability classification: SW Iberian Peninsula case study. J Coast Res 17:802–811

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom J, McKinney L, Ball L, Winchell C (2007) Quantifying off-highway vehicle impacts on density and survival of a threatened dune-endemic plant. Biol Conserv 135:119–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammond J, Keeney R, Raiffa H (2001) Decisiones inteligentes: guía practica para tomar mejores decisiones. Editorial Norma, Bogotá

    Google Scholar 

  • Hockings M, Twyford K (1997) Assessment and management of beach camping within Fraser Island World Heritage Area, South East Queensland. Aust J Environ Manag 4:25–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopfensperger K, Engelhardt K, Seagle S (2007) Ecological feasibility studies in restoration decision making. Environ Manag 39:843–852

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosier P, Kochhar M, Thayer V (1981) Off-road vehicle and pedestrian track effects on the sea-approach of hatchling loggerhead turtles. Environ Conserv 8:158–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juárez I, Nava M, Gallardo F, Cruz y J, Fajersson P (2008) Potencial para turismo alternativo del municipio de Paso de Ovejas, Veracruz. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst 8:199–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Kentula ME, Brooks RP, Gwin SE, Holland CC, Sherman AD, Sifneos JC (1992) An approach to improving decision making in wetland restoration and creation: Hairston A (ed): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory, Corvallis, Oregon. US. 151p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kutiel P, Zhevelev H, Harrison R (1999) The effect of recreational impacts on soil and vegetation of stabilised coastal dunes in the Sharon Park, Israel. Ocean Coast Manag 42:1041–1060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ley-Vega J, Gallego-Fernández J, Vidal C (2007) Manual de Restauración de dunas costeras. Ed. Ministerio del Medio Ambiente. Dirección General de Costas. 258 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Lithgow Serrano AD (2010) Diseño de estrategias para la restauración de dunas costeras en el estado de Veracruz. Xalapa, Ver. México. INECOL

    Google Scholar 

  • Llewellyn P, Shackley S (1996) The effects of mechanical beach-cleaning on invertebrate populations. British Wildl 7:147–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Longcore T, Rich C (2004) Ecological light pollution. Front Ecol Environ 2:191–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbert R, Chu T (2001) Challenges to cleaning up formerly used defense sites in the twenty-first century. Remediation 11:19–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbach R, Bury B (1983) Effects of off-road vehicles on the biota of the Algodones Dunes, Imperial County, California. J Appl Ecol 20:265–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlan A, Brown A (2001) The ecology of sandy shores. Publicaciones Elsevier, Amsterdam, 357 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza-González G, Martínez ML, Lithgow D, Pérez-Maqueo O, and Simonin P (2012) Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Economics 82:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez M, Psuty N, Lubke R (2004) A perspective on coastal dunes. In: Martínez M, Psuty N (eds) Coastal dunes: ecology and conservation, Ecological studies 171. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez M, Gallego-Fernández J, García-Franco J, Moctezuma C, Jiménez C (2006) Assessment of coastal dune vulnerability to natural and anthropogenic disturbances along the Gulf of Mexico. Environ Conserv 33(2):109–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno-Casasola P, Peresbarbosa E, Travieso-Bello A (2006) Estrategia para el Manejo Costero Integral. El Enfoque Municipal. Instituto de Ecología A.C. Xalapa, Veracruz, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz-Vallés S, Gallego-Fernández J, Dellafiore C (2011) Dune vulnerability in relation with tourism pressure in central Gulf of Cádiz (SW Spain), a case study. J Coast Restor 27:243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (1993a) Beach restoration in the southeastern US: environmental effects and biological monitoring. Ocean Coast Manag 19:157–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson W (1993b) Beach-inlet ecosystems of south-eastern Florida: a review of ecological research needs and management issues. J Coast Res 18:257–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordstrom K (2000) Beaches and dunes on developed coasts. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 338 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira A, Laranjeira M, Neves M (2000) A resilience checklist to evaluate coastal dune vulnerability. Coast Manag 102(1):309–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson C, Bishop M, Johnson G, D’Anna L, Manning L (2006) Exploiting beach filling as an unaffordable experiment: benthic intertidal impacts propagating upwards to shore birds. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 338:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkey O, Young R, Kelley J, Griffith A (2007) Mining of coastal sand: a critical environmental and economic problem for Morocco. Reporte para coastal care ORG. http://coastalcare.org/wp-content/pdf/morocco_mining.pdf

  • Poinar G (1977) Observations on the kelp fly, Coelopa vanduzeei Cresson, in southern California. Pan-Pacific Entomol 53:81–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Povh D (2000) Economic instruments for sustainable development in the Mediterranean region. Responsible coastal zone management. Period Biol 102(1):407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Priskin J (2003) Physical impacts of four-wheel drive related tourism and recreation in a semi-arid, natural environment. Ocean Coast Manag 46:127–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rickard C, McLachlan A, Kerley G (1994) The effects of vehicular and pedestrian traffic on dune vegetation in South Africa. Ocean Coast Manag 23:225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T (1980) The analytic hierarchical process. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher T, Thompson L (2008) Physical impacts caused by off-road vehicles (ORVs) to sandy beaches: spatial quantification of car tracks on an Australian barrier island. J Coastal Res 24:234–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlacher T, Schoeman D, Dugan J, Lastra M, Jones A, Scapini F, McLachlan A (2008) Sandy beach ecosystems: key features, management challenges, climate change impacts and sampling issues. Mar Ecol 29:70–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Society of Ecological Restoration (SER) International (2004) Principios de SER Internacional sobre restauración ecológica. http://www.ser.org/pdf/REV_Spanish_Primer.pdf

  • Speybroeck J, Bonte D, Courtens W, Gheskiere T, Grootaert P, Maelfait J, Mathys M, Provoost S, Sabbe K, Stienen W, Van Lancker V, Vincx M, Degraer S (2006) Beach nourishment: an ecologically sound coastal defence alternative? A review. Aquat Conserv Marine Freshw Ecosyst 16:419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Meulen F, Salman S (1993) Management of Mediterranean coastal dunes. In: Ozhan E (ed) MedCoast,’93. METU, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Davies P, Curr R, Koh A, Bodéré J, Hallegouet B, Meur C, Yoni C (1993) A checklist assessment of dune vulnerability and protection in Devon and Cornwall, UK. In: Magoon OT (ed) Coastal zone’93. American Society of Civil Engineering, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Davies P, Alveirinho-Dias J, Pereira A, García-Mora M, Tejada M (1994) A reevaluation of dune vulnerability checklist parameters. Gaia 8:179–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams A, Alveirinho-Dias J, García-Novo F, García-Mora M, Curr R, Pereira A (2001) Integrated coastal dune management: checklists. Cont Shelf Res 21:1937–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams J, Ward V, Underhill L (2004) Waders respond quickly and positively to the banning of off-road vehicles from beaches in South Africa. Wader Study Group Bull 104:79–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We could not have written this chapter without the invaluable help of Dr Fabiola López, Dr Rusty Feagin, Dr Giorgio Anfuso, Dr Octavio Pérez- Maqueo, Gilberto Binnqüist MSc, Astrid Wojtarowski MSS, Dr José María Rey Benayas, Dr Jorge López Portillo, Dr A.P. Grootjans, Dr Bas Arens, Dr Norbert Psuty, and Dr Patrick Hesp who were generous enough to share with us their expertise and experience, as well as provide us with information and enriching comments at different stages of this research. For this we are deeply grateful. We would also like to express our gratitude to Keith MacMillan for translating the document. Finally, the Instituto de Ecología, A.C (INECOL) and the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACyT) are acknowledged for funding this research, which is part of a wider project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Luisa Martínez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lithgow, D., Martínez, M.L., Gallego-Fernández, J.B. (2013). Multicriteria Analysis to Implement Actions Leading to Coastal Dune Restoration. In: Martínez, M., Gallego-Fernández, J., Hesp, P. (eds) Restoration of Coastal Dunes. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33445-0_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics