Skip to main content

PTL: A Propositional Typicality Logic

  • Conference paper
Logics in Artificial Intelligence (JELIA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7519))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We introduce Propositional Typicality LogicĀ (PTL), a logic for reasoning about typicality. We do so by enriching classical propositional logic with a typicality operator of which the intuition is to capture the most typical (or normal) situations in which a formula holds. The semantics is in terms of ranked models as studied in KLM-style preferential reasoning. This allows us to show that rational consequence relations can be embedded in our logic. Moreover we show that we can define consequence relations on the language of PTL itself, thereby moving beyond the propositional setting. Building on the existing link between propositional rational consequence and belief revision, we show that the same correspondence holds for rational consequence and belief revision on PTL. We investigate entailment for PTL, and propose two appropriate notions thereof.

This work is based upon research supported by the National Research Foundation. Any opinion, findings and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and therefore the NRF do not accept any liability in regard thereto. This work was partially funded by Project number 247601, Net2: Network for Enabling Networked Knowledge, from the FP7-PEOPLE-2009-IRSES call.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. AlchourrĆ³n, C., GƤrdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. Journal of Symbolic LogicĀ 50, 510ā€“530 (1985)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  2. Boutilier, C.: Conditional logics of normality: A modal approach. Artificial IntelligenceĀ 68(1), 87ā€“154 (1994)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. Britz, K., Heidema, J., Labuschagne, W.: Semantics for dual preferential entailment. Journal of Phil. LogicĀ 38, 433ā€“446 (2009)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. Britz, K., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I.: Preferential reasoning for modal logics. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer ScienceĀ 278, 55ā€“69 (2011)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. Britz, K., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I.: Semantic Foundation for Preferential Description Logics. In: Wang, D., Reynolds, M. (eds.) AI 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol.Ā 7106, pp. 491ā€“500. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    ChapterĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. Britz, K., Varzinczak, I.: Defeasible modes of inference: A preferential perspective. In: 14th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, NMR (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. Crocco, G., Lamarre, P.: On the connections between nonmonotonic inference systems and conditional logics. In: Proc. KR, pp. 565ā€“571. Morgan Kaufmann (1992)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  8. Delgrande, J.P.: A first-order logic for prototypical properties. Art. Intel.Ā 33, 105ā€“130 (1987)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  9. GƤrdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: Nonmonotonic inference based on expectations. Artificial IntelligenceĀ 65(2), 197ā€“245 (1994)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  10. Giordano, L., Gliozzi, V., Olivetti, N., Pozzato, G.L.: A minimal model semantics for rational closure. In: 14th International Workshop on Nonmonotonic Reasoning, NMR (2012)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. Giordano, L., Olivetti, N., Gliozzi, V., Pozzato, G.L.: \(\mathcal{ALC}+{T}\): a preferential extension of description logics. Fundamenta InformaticaeĀ 96(3), 341ā€“372 (2009)

    MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  12. Katsuno, H., Mendelzon, A.: Propositional knowledge base revision and minimal change. Artificial IntelligenceĀ 3(52), 263ā€“294 (1991)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  13. Kraus, S., Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: Nonmonotonic reasoning, preferential models and cumulative logics. Artificial IntelligenceĀ 44, 167ā€“207 (1990)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  14. Lehmann, D., Magidor, M.: What does a conditional knowledge base entail? Artificial IntelligenceĀ 55, 1ā€“60 (1992)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Booth, R., Meyer, T., Varzinczak, I. (2012). PTL: A Propositional Typicality Logic. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7519. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33353-8_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33352-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33353-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics