Skip to main content

Rule Quality Measure-Based Induction of Unordered Sets of Regression Rules

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7557))

Abstract

This paper presents the algorithm for induction of unordered sets of regression rules. It uses sequential covering strategy and dynamic reduction to classification approach. The main focus is put on quality measures which control the process of rule induction. We examined the effectiveness of nine quality measures. Moreover, we propose and compare three schemes of the prediction of target attribute value of examples covered by more than one rule. We also show rule filtration algorithm for the reduction of the number of generated rules. All experiments were carried out on 35 benchmark datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kryszkiewicz, M.: Fast Discovery of Representative Association Rules. In: Polkowski, L., Skowron, A. (eds.) RSCTC 1998. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1424, pp. 214–221. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Fürnkranz, J.: Separate-and-conquer rule learning. Artificial Intelligence Review 13, 3–54 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Stefanowski, J., Vanderpooten, D.: Induction of decision rules in classification and discovery-oriented perspectives. Int. J. Intell. Syst. 16(1), 13–27 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Grzymala-Busse, J.W., Ziarko, W.: Data mining based on rough sets. In: Data Mining: Opportunities and Challenges, pp. 142–173. IGI Global (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wojtusiak, J., Michalski, R.S., Kaufman, K.A., Pietrzykowski, J.: The AQ21 natural induction program for pattern discovery: Initial version and its novel features. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp. 13–15 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fawcett, T.: PRIE: a system for generating rulelists to maximize ROC performance. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 17(2), 207–224 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. An, A., Cercone, N.: Rule quality measures for rule induction systems: Description and evaluation. Computational Intelligence 17(3), 409–424 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bruha, I., Tkadlec, J.: Rule quality for multiple-rule classifier: Empirical expertise and theoretical methodology. Intell. Data Anal. 7(2), 99–124 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Brzezinska, I., Greco, S., Slowinski, R.: Mining pareto-optimal rules with respect to support and confirmation or support and anti-support. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 20(5), 587–600 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Janssen, F., Fürnkranz, J.: On the quest for optimal rule learning heuristics. Machine Learning 78(3), 343–379 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sikora, M.: Rule Quality Measures in Creation and Reduction of Data Rule Models. In: Greco, S., Hata, Y., Hirano, S., Inuiguchi, M., Miyamoto, S., Nguyen, H.S., Słowiński, R. (eds.) RSCTC 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4259, pp. 716–725. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Sikora, M.: Decision Rule-Based Data Models Using TRS and NetTRS – Methods and Algorithms. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XI. LNCS, vol. 5946, pp. 130–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikora, M., Wróbel, Ł.: Data-Driven Adaptive Selection of Rules Quality Measures for Improving the Rules Induction Algorithm. In: Kuznetsov, S.O., Ślęzak, D., Hepting, D.H., Mirkin, B.G. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6743, pp. 278–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Sikora, M., Wróbel, L.: Data-driven adaptive selection of rule quality measures for improving rule induction and filtration algorithms. International Journal of General Systems (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Torgo, L., Gama, J.: Regression by Classification. In: Borges, D.L., Kaestner, C.A.A. (eds.) SBIA 1996. LNCS, vol. 1159, pp. 51–60. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, R.J.: Learning with continuous classes. In: 5th Australian Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 343–348. World Scientific, Singapore (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Holmes, G., Hall, M., Frank, E.: Generating Rule Sets from Model Trees. In: Foo, N.Y. (ed.) AI 1999. LNCS, vol. 1747, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Friedman, J.H., Popescu, B.E.: Predictive learning via rule ensembles. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 916–954 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dembczyński, K., Kotłowski, W., Słowiński, R.: Solving Regression by Learning an Ensemble of Decision Rules. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) ICAISC 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5097, pp. 533–544. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Demšar, D.: Obravnavanje numeričnih problemov z induktivnim logičnim programiranjem. Master’s thesis, Faculty of Computer and Information Science, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 59, 64 (1999) (in Slovene)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Janssen, F., Fürnkranz, J.: Heuristic rule-based regression via dynamic reduction to classification. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) Proceedings of the 22nd International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2011), pp. 1330–1335 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ženko, B., Džeroski, S., Struyf, J.: Learning Predictive Clustering Rules. In: Bonchi, F., Boulicaut, J.-F. (eds.) KDID 2005. LNCS, vol. 3933, pp. 234–250. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Witten, I.H., Frank, E., Hall, M.A.: Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 3rd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Demšar, J.: Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 7, 1–30 (2006)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Garcia, S., Herrera, F.: An Extension on ”Statistical Comparisons of Classifiers over Multiple Data Sets” for all Pairwise Comparisons. Journal of Machine Learning Research 9, 2677–2694 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sikora, M., Skowron, A., Wróbel, Ł. (2012). Rule Quality Measure-Based Induction of Unordered Sets of Regression Rules. In: Ramsay, A., Agre, G. (eds) Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications. AIMSA 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7557. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33185-5_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33185-5_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33184-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33185-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics