Skip to main content

Probabilistic Optimization of Semantic Process Model Matching

  • Conference paper
Business Process Management (BPM 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7481))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Business process models are increasingly used by companies, often yielding repositories of several thousand models. These models are of great value for business analysis such as service identification or process standardization. A problem is though that many of these analyses require the pairwise comparison of process models, which is hardly feasible to do manually given an extensive number of models. While the computation of similarity between a pair of process models has been intensively studied in recent years, there is a notable gap on automatically matching activities of two process models. In this paper, we develop an approach based on semantic techniques and probabilistic optimization. We evaluate our approach using a sample of admission processes from different universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., van Dongen, B., Käärik, R., Mendling, J.: Similarity of business process models: Metrics and evaluation. Information Systems 36, 498–516 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Grigori, D., Corrales, J.C., Bouzeghoub, M., Gater, A.: Ranking bpel processes for service discovery. IEEE T. Services Computing 3(3), 178–192 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zha, H., Wang, J., Wen, L., Wang, C., Sun, J.: A workflow net similarity measure based on transition adjacency relations. Computers in Industry 61(5), 463–471 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Becker, M., Laue, R.: A comparative survey of business process similarity measures. Computers in Industry 63(2), 148–167 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Niemann, M., Siebenhaar, M., Schulte, S., Steinmetz, R.: Comparison and retrieval of process models using related cluster pairs. Computers in Industry 63(2), 168–180 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kunze, M., Weidlich, M., Weske, M.: Behavioral Similarity – A Proper Metric. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 166–181. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Dijkman, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., Käärik, R.: Aligning business process models. In: IEEE International EDOC Conference 2009, pp. 45–53 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ehrig, M., Koschmider, A., Oberweis, A.: Measuring similarity between semantic business process models. In: Roddick, J., Hinze, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fourth Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2007), vol. 67, pp. 71–80. Australian Computer Science Communications, Ballarat (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mendling, J., Reijers, H.A., Recker, J.: Activity labeling in process modeling: Empirical insights and recommendations. Inf. Syst. 35(4), 467–482 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Leopold, H., Smirnov, S., Mendling, J.: On the refactoring of activity labels in business process models. Information Systems 37(5), 443–459 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miller, G.A.: Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Commun. ACM 38(11), 39–41 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee, J.H., Kim, M.H., Lee, Y.J.: Information retrieval based on conceptual distance in is-a hierarchies. Journal of Documentation 49(2), 188–207 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 19(1), 17–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 448–453. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lin, D.: An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. In: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 1998), pp. 296–304. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1998), http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=645527.657297

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gal, A.: Uncertain Schema Matching. Synthesis Lectures on Data Management. Morgan & Claypool Publishers (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Weske, M.: Efficient consistency measurement based on behavioral profiles of process models. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 37(3), 410–429 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Richardson, M., Domingos, P.: Markov logic networks. Machine Learning 62(1-2), 107–136 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models: Principles and Techniques. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Getoor, L., Taskar, B.: Introduction to Statistical Relational Learning. MIT Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Manning, C.D., Schütze, H.: Foundations of statistical natural language processing. MIT Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Niepert, M., Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: A Probabilistic-Logical Framework for Ontology Matching. In: Proceedings of the 24th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Noessner, J., Niepert, M.: CODI: Combinatorial Optimization for Data Integration–Results for OAEI 2010. In: Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Ontology Matching (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Analyzing mapping extraction approaches. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Ontology Matching (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Riedel, S.: Improving the accuracy and efficiency of MAP inference for Markov logic. In: Proc. of UAI 2008, pp. 468–475 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology matching. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Doan, A., Halevy, A.Y.: Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AI Magazine 26(1), 83–94 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Noy, N.F.: Semantic integration: A survey of ontology-based approaches. SIGMOD Record 33(4), 65–70 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic matching. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal 18(3), 265–280 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Giunchiglia, F., Yatskevich, M., Shvaiko, P.: Semantic Matching: Algorithms and Implementation. In: Spaccapietra, S., Atzeni, P., Fages, F., Hacid, M.-S., Kifer, M., Mylopoulos, J., Pernici, B., Shvaiko, P., Trujillo, J., Zaihrayeu, I. (eds.) Journal on Data Semantics IX. LNCS, vol. 4601, pp. 1–38. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Leopold, H., Niepert, M., Weidlich, M., Mendling, J., Dijkman, R., Stuckenschmidt, H. (2012). Probabilistic Optimization of Semantic Process Model Matching. In: Barros, A., Gal, A., Kindler, E. (eds) Business Process Management. BPM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7481. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32885-5_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-32884-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-32885-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics