Abstract
The registrations of functions and images is a widely-studied problem that has seen a variety of solutions in the recent years. Most of these solutions are based on objective functions that fail to satisfy two most basic and desired properties in registration: (1) invariance under identical warping: since the registration between two images is unchanged under identical domain warping, the cost function evaluating registrations should also remain unchanged; (2) inverse consistency: the optimal registration of image A to B should be the same as that of image B to A. We present a novel registration approach that uses the L 2 norm, between certain vector fields derived from images, as an objective function for registering images. This framework satisfies symmetry and invariance properties. We demonstrate this framework using examples from different types of images and compare performances with some recent methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agrawal, A., Raskar, R., Chellappa, R.: An algebraic approach to surface reconstructions from gradient fields? In: Intenational Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV (2006)
Avants, B., Grossman, M., Gee, J.: Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative cortex and frontal lobe. Biomedical Image Registration 4057, 50–57 (2006)
Beg, M., Miller, M., Trouvé, A., Younes, L.: Computing large deformation metric mappings via geodesic flows of diffeomorphisms. Int. J. Comput. Vision 61, 139–157 (2005)
Christensen, G., Johnson, H.: Consistent image registration. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 20(7), 568–582 (2001)
Davies, R., Twining, C., Cootes, T., Waterton, J., Taylor, C.: A minimum description length approach to statistical shape modeling. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 21(5), 525–537 (2002)
Kroon, D., Slump, C.: MRI modalitiy transformation in demon registration. In: IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: From Nano to Macro, ISBI 2009, pp. 963–966 (2009)
Kurtek, S., Klassen, E., Ding, Z., Jacobson, S., Jacobson, J., Avison, M., Srivastava, A.: Parameterization-invariant shape comparisons of anatomical surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 30(3), 849–858 (2011)
Palais, R.: Morse theory on Hilbert manifolds. Topology 2, 299–340 (1963)
Tagare, H., Groisser, D., Skrinjar, O.: Symmetric non-rigid registration: A geometric theory and some numerical techniques. Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision 34, 61–88 (2009)
Taquet, M., Macq, B., Warfield, S.: A generalized correlation coefficient: application to DTI and multi-fiber DTI. In: MMBIA 2012 (2012)
Vercauteren, T., Pennec, X., Perchant, A., Ayache, N.: Diffeomorphic demons: Efficient non-parametric image registration. NeuroImage 45(1, supplement 1), S61–S72 (2009)
Viola, P., Wells III, W.M.: Alignment by maximization of mutual information. In: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Computer Vision, pp. 16–23 (June 1995)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xie, Q., Kurtek, S., Christensen, G.E., Ding, Z., Klassen, E., Srivastava, A. (2012). A Novel Framework for Metric-Based Image Registration. In: Dawant, B.M., Christensen, G.E., Fitzpatrick, J.M., Rueckert, D. (eds) Biomedical Image Registration. WBIR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31340-0_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31340-0_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31339-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31340-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)