Abstract
Artificial social agents can influence people. However, artificial social agents are not real humans, and people may ascribe less agency to them. Would the persuasive power of a social robot diminish when people ascribe only little agency to it? To investigate this question, we performed an experiment in which participants performed tasks on a washing machine and received feedback from a robot about their energy consumption (e.g., “Your energy consumption is too high”), or factual, non-social feedback. This robot was introduced to participants as (a) an avatar (that was controlled a human in all its feedback actions; high agency), or as (b) an autonomous robot (that controlled its own feedback actions; moderate agency), or as (c) a robot that produced only random feedback; low agency). Results indicated that participants consumed less energy when a robotic social agent gave them feedback than when they received non-social feedback. This behavioral effect was independent of the level of robotic agency. In contrast, a perceived agency measure indicated that the random feedback robot was ascribed the lowest agency rating. These results suggest that the persuasive power of robot behavior is independent of the extent to which the persuadee explicitly ascribes agency to the agent.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aharoni, E., Fridlund, A.J.: Social reactions toward people vs. computers: How mere labels shape interactions. Computers in Human Behavior 23, 2175–2189 (2007)
Blascovich, J.: A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments, pp. 25–30. Association for Computing Machinery, Bonn (2002)
Fogg, B.J., Nass, C.: Silicon sycophants: the effects of computers that flatter. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46, 551–561 (1997)
Guadagno, R.E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J.N., McCall, C.: Virtual humans and persuasion: The Effect of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology 10, 1–22 (2007)
Ham, J., Midden, C.: A robot that says “Bad!”: Using negative and positive social feedback from a robotic agent to save energy. In: Conference Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction, 2009, San Diego, USA (2009)
Johnson, D., Gardner, J.A.: The media equation and team formation: Further evidence for experience as a moderator. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 65, 111–124 (2007)
Johnson, D., Gardner, J.A.: Exploring mindlessness as an explanation for the media equation: a study of stereotyping in computer tutorials. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 13, 151–163 (2009)
Johnson, D., Gardner, J.A., Wiles, J.: Experience as a moderator of the media equation: the impact of flattery and praise. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61, 237–258 (2004)
Krämer, N.C.: Social Effects of Virtual Assistants. A Review of Empirical Results with Regard to Communication. In: Prendinger, H., Lester, J., Ishizuka, M. (eds.) IVA 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5208, pp. 507–508. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Langer, E.J.: Matters of Mind: Mindfulness/Mindlessness in Perspective. Conscious. and Cogn. 1, 289–305 (1992)
Midden, C., Ham, J.: Social influence of a persuasive agent: the role of agent embodiment and evaluative feedback. In: Conference Proceedings of Persuasive 2009, Claremont, USA (2009)
Nass, C., Moon, Y.: Machines and Mindlessness: Social Responses to Computers. J. of Soc. Issues 56(1), 81–103 (2000)
Nass, C., Moon, Y., Carney, P.: Are respondents polite to computers? Social desirability and direct responses to computers. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 29, 1093–1110 (1999)
Nowak, K.L., Biocca, F.: The effect of the agency and anthropomorphism on users’ sense of telepresence, copresence, and social presence in virtual environments. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 12, 2–35 (2003)
Reeves, B., Nass, C.: The media equation. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Roubroeks, M., Ham, J., Midden, C.: When artificial social agents try to persuade people: The role of social agency on the occurrence of psychological reactance. International Journal of Social Robotics 3, 155–165 (2011)
Vossen, S., Ham, J., Midden, C.: What Makes Social Feedback from a Robot Work? Disentangling the Effect of Speech, Physical Appearance and Evaluation. In: Ploug, T., Hasle, P., Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6137, pp. 52–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Midden, C., Ham, J. (2012). The Illusion of Agency: The Influence of the Agency of an Artificial Agent on Its Persuasive Power. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. Design for Health and Safety. PERSUASIVE 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7284. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31037-9_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-31036-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-31037-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)