Skip to main content

Modeling Dynamic Architectures Using Dy-BIP

  • Conference paper
Software Composition (SC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7306))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Dynamic architectures in which interactions between components can evolve during execution, are essential for modern computing systems such as web-based systems, reconfigurable middleware, wireless sensor networks and fault-tolerant systems. Currently, we lack rigorous frameworks for their modeling, development and implementation. We propose Dy-BIP a dynamic extension of the BIP component framework rooted in rigorous operational semantics and supporting a powerful and high-level set of primitives for describing dynamic interactions. These are expressed as symbolic constraints offered by interacting components and computed efficiently by an execution Engine. We present experimental results which validate the effectiveness of Dy-BIP and show significant advantages over using static architecture models.

This work is partially supported by the FP7 IP ASCENS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: A Framework for Classifying and Comparing Architecture Description Languages. In: Jazayeri, M. (ed.) ESEC 1997 and ESEC-FSE 1997. LNCS, vol. 1301, pp. 60–76. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Garlan, D., Monroe, R.T., Wile, D.: Acme: An architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of CASCON 1997, Toronto, Ontario, pp. 169–183 (November 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen, R.B., Douence, R., Garlan, D.: Specifying and Analyzing Dynamic Software Architectures. In: Astesiano, E. (ed.) ETAPS 1998 and FASE 1998. LNCS, vol. 1382, pp. 21–37. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Basu, A., Bensalem, S., Bozga, M., Combaz, J., Jaber, M., Nguyen, T.H., Sifakis, J.: Rigorous component-based system design using the bip framework. IEEE Software 28(3), 41–48 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Basu, A., Bidinger, P., Bozga, M., Sifakis, J.: Distributed Semantics and Implementation for Systems with Interaction and Priority. In: Suzuki, K., Higashino, T., Yasumoto, K., El-Fakih, K. (eds.) FORTE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5048, pp. 116–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Bliudze, S., Sifakis, J.: Causal Semantics for the Algebra of Connectors (Extended Abstruct). In: de Boer, F.S., Bonsangue, M.M., Graf, S., de Roever, W.-P. (eds.) FMCO 2007. LNCS, vol. 5382, pp. 179–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Inverardi, P., Wolf, A.L.: Formal specification and analysis of software architectures using the chemical abstract machine model. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 21(4), 373–386 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Métayer, D.L.: Describing software architecture styles using graph grammars. IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 24(7), 521–533 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Milner, R.: Communicating and mobile systems - the Pi-calculus. Cambridge University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Dynamic structure in software architectures. SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes 21, 3–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bliudze, S., Sifakis, J.: The algebra of connectors: structuring interaction in bip. In: EMSOFT, pp. 11–20 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, J.S., Garlan, D.: Analyzing architectural styles. Journal of Systems and Software 83(7), 1216–1235 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kacem, M.H., Jmaiel, M., Kacem, A.H., Drira, K.: Evaluation and comparison of adl based approaches for the description of dynamic of software architectures. In: ICEIS (3), pp. 189–195 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Georgiadis, I., Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Self-organising software architectures for distributed systems. In: WOSS, pp. 33–38 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Belguidoum, M., Dagnat, F.: Dependency management in software component deployment. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 182, 17–32 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bozga, M., Jaber, M., Maris, N., Sifakis, J. (2012). Modeling Dynamic Architectures Using Dy-BIP. In: Gschwind, T., De Paoli, F., Gruhn, V., Book, M. (eds) Software Composition. SC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7306. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30564-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30564-1_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30563-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30564-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics