Abstract
All Dutch municipalities offer the same range of services, and the processes delivering these services are quite similar. Therefore, these municipalities can benefit from configurable process models. This requires the merging of existing process variants into configurable models. Unfortunately, existing merging techniques (1) allow for configurable process models which can be instantiated to unsound process models, and (2) are not always reversible, which means that not all original models can be obtained by instantiation of the configurable process model. In this paper, we propose to capture the control-flow of a process by a CoSeNet: a configurable, tree-like representation of the process model, which is sound by construction, and we describe how to merge two CoSeNets into another CoSeNet such that the merge is reversible. Initial experiments show that this approach does not influence complexity significantly, i.e. it results in similar complexities for the configurable process model compared to existing techniques, while it guarantees soundness and reversibility.
This research has been carried out as part of the Configurable Services for Local Governments (CoSeLoG) project ( http://www.win.tue.nl/coselog/ ).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Verification of Workflow Nets. In: Azéma, P., Balbo, G. (eds.) ICATPN 1997. LNCS, vol. 1248, pp. 407–426. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
La Rosa, M., Dumas, M., Uba, R., Dijkman, R.M.: Business Process Model Merging: An Approach to Business Process Consolidation (in press, 2012)
Kopp, O., Martin, D., Wutke, D., Leymann, F.: The Difference Between Graph-Based and Block-Structured Business Process Modelling Languages. Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems 4(1), 3–13 (2009)
Vogelaar, J.J.C.L., Verbeek, H.M.W., Luka, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Comparing Business Processes to Determine the Feasibility of Configurable Models: A Case Study. In: Daniel, F., Barkaoui, K., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2011, Part II. LNBIP, vol. 100, pp. 50–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Schunselaar, D.M.M., Verbeek, H.M.W., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Reijers, H.A.: Creating Sound and Reversible Configurable Processes Models using CoSeNets. Technical Report BPM Center Report BPM-11-21, BPMcenter.org (2011)
Schunselaar, D.M.M.: Configurable Declare. Master’s thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (2011)
Gottschalk, F.: Configurable Process Models. PhD thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands (2009)
Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A Configurable Reference Modelling Language. Information Systems 32(1), 1–23 (2007)
van der Aalst, W.M.P., Lohmann, N., La Rosa, M.: Ensuring Correctness During Process Configuration Via Partner Synthesis. Information Systems 37(6), 574–592 (2012)
van der Aalst, W., Lohmann, N., La Rosa, M., Xu, J.: Correctness Ensuring Process Configuration: An Approach Based on Partner Synthesis. In: Hull, R., Mendling, J., Tai, S. (eds.) BPM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6336, pp. 95–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Li, C., Reichert, M., Wombacher, A.: Discovering Reference Models by Mining Process Variants Using a Heuristic Approach. In: Dayal, U., Eder, J., Koehler, J., Reijers, H.A. (eds.) BPM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5701, pp. 344–362. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Mendling, J., Simon, C.: Business Process Design by View Integration. In: Eder, J., Dustdar, S. (eds.) BPM Workshops 2006. LNCS, vol. 4103, pp. 55–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
La Rosa, M., Reijers, H.A., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dijkman, R.M., Mendling, J., Dumas, M., GarcÃa-Bañuelos, L.: APROMORE: An advanced process model repository. Expert Systems with Applications 38, 7029–7040 (2011)
Sun, S., Kumar, A., Yen, J.: Merging Workflows: A New Perspective on Connecting Business Processes. Decision Support Systems 42(2), 844–858 (2006)
Mendling, J.: Metrics for Process Models: Empirical Foundations of Verification, Error Prediction, and Guidelines for Correctness. Springer (2008)
Cardoso, J.: Control-flow Complexity Measurement of Processes and Weyuker’s Properties. In: 6th International Enformatika Conference, Transactions on Enformatika, Systems Sciences and Engineering, vol. 8, pp. 213–218 (2005)
Vanderfeesten, I.T.P., Reijers, H.A., Mendling, J., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Cardoso, J.: On a Quest for Good Process Models: The Cross-Connectivity Metric. In: Bellahsène, Z., Léonard, M. (eds.) CAiSE 2008. LNCS, vol. 5074, pp. 480–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Adams, M., Russell, N. (eds.): Modern Business Process Automation: YAWL and its Support Environment. Springer (2010)
Weidlich, M., Dijkman, R., Mendling, J.: The ICoP Framework: Identification of Correspondences between Process Models. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Schunselaar, D.M.M., Verbeek, E., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Raijers, H.A. (2012). Creating Sound and Reversible Configurable Process Models Using CoSeNets. In: Abramowicz, W., Kriksciuniene, D., Sakalauskas, V. (eds) Business Information Systems. BIS 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 117. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30359-3_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30359-3_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-30358-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-30359-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)