Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Towards Applying Normalized Systems Theory Implications to Enterprise Process Reference Models

  • Conference paper
Advances in Enterprise Engineering VI (EEWC 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 110))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The analysis phase in the overall development life cycle of information systems has frequently proved to be a difficult assignment as the quality of the work heavily depends on the skills, experience and domain knowledge of the analyst. As a consequence, analysis patterns and reference models have been introduced in the past as a means to consolidate best-practices in conceptual modeling (often incorporating specific domain knowledge) and guiding analysts in their modeling efforts. However, the actual evaluation of reference models or analysis patterns available remains a challenging issue. Here, the evolvability or flexibility of the considered frameworks seems to be a legitimate evaluation criterion. Hence, in this paper, the well-known SAP Reference Model framework is analyzed with regard to its adherence to Normalized Systems (NS) theory design principles as this theory specifically focuses on the evolvability of modular structures such as information systems and business processes. It is concluded that it is feasible to employ the NS theory to evaluate such reference models from an evolvability point of view and distinguish both aspects and indications towards conformance with NS theory, as well as indications of possible violations regarding its principles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Satzinger, J., Jackson, R., Burd, S.: Systems analysis and design in a changing world, 5th edn. Course Technology (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research commentary: Information systems and conceptual modeling — a research agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363–376 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moody, D.L.: Metrics for Evaluating the Quality of Entity Relationship Models. In: Ling, T.-W., Ram, S., Li Lee, M. (eds.) ER 1998. LNCS, vol. 1507, pp. 211–225. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jacobson, I., Christerson, M., Jonsson, P., Övergaard, G.: Object-oriented software engineering: a use case driven approach. Addison Wesley (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer, G., Redmiles, C.F., Williams, L., Puhr, G.I., Aoki, A., Nakakoji, K.: Beyond object-oriented technology: where current approaches fall short. Human-Computer Interaction 10, 79–119 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis. In: Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 1–21. Idea Group Publishing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Frank, U.: Evaluation of Reference Models. In: Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 118–140. Idea Group Publishing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J.: Normalized systems: re-creating information technology based on laws for software evolvability. Koppa (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Towards evolvable software architectures based on systems theoretic stability. Software: Practice and Experience 42, 89–116 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: The transformation of requirements into software primitives: Studying evolvability based on systems theoretic stability. Science of Computer Programming 76(12), 1210–1222 (2011); Special Issue on Software Evolution, Adaptability and Variability

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. De Bruyn, P., Mannaert, H.: Towards applying normalized systems concepts to modularity and the systems engineering process. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Systems, ICONS 2012, pp. 59–66 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. De Bruyn, P.: Towards Designing Enterprises for Evolvability Based on Fundamental Engineering Concepts. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7046, pp. 11–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Nuffel, D.: Towards Designing Modular and Evolvable Business Processes. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huysmans, P.: On the Feasibility of Normalized Enterprises: Applying Normalized Systems Theory to the High-Level Design of Enterprises. PhD thesis, University of Antwerp (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Keller, G., Teufel, T.: SAP R/3 Process Oriented Implementation. Addison Wesley Longman (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Curran, T., Keller, G., Ladd, A.: SAP R/3 Business Blueprint: Understanding the Business Process Reference Model. Prentice Hall PTR (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Coplien, J.: The culture of patterns. Computer Science and Information Systems 1(2), 1–26 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison Wesley Professional (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hay, D.C.: Data Model Patterns: Conventions of Thought. Dorset House (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fowler, M.: Analysis Patterns: Reusable Object Models. Addison Wesley Professional (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scheer, A.: Business Process Engineering – Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Silverston, L.: The Data Model Resource Book v.1: A Library of Universal Data Models for All Enterprises, vol. 1. John Wiley & Sons (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. McCarthy, W.E.: The rea accounting model: A generalized framework for accounting systems in a shared data environment. The Accounting Review 57(3), 554–578 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dietz, J.: Enterprise Ontology. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Kodaganallur, V., Shim, S.: Analysis patterns: A taxonomy and its implications. Information Systems Management 23(3), 52–61 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fettke, P., Loos, P.: Multiperspective Evaluation of Reference Models – Towards a Framework. In: Jeusfeld, M.A., Pastor, Ó. (eds.) ER Workshops 2003. LNCS, vol. 2814, pp. 80–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2003), doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-39597-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Mannaert, H., De Bruyn, P., Verelst, J.: Exploring entropy in software systems: Towards a precise definition and design rules. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Systems, ICONS 2012, pp. 93–99 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Malone, T., Crowston, K., Lee, J., Pentland, B., Dellarocas, C., Wyner, G., Quimby, K., Osborn, C., Bernstein, A., Herman, G., Klein, M., O’Donnell, E.: Tools for inveting organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. Management Science 45(3), 425–443 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Malone, T., Crowston, K., Herman, G.: Organizing Business Knowledge: The MIT Process Handbook. The MIT Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  30. De Bruyn, P., Van Nuffel, D., Huysmans, P., Mannaert, H.: Towards functional and constructional perspectives on business process patterns. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Software Engineering Advances (ICSEA 2011), pp. 459–464 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Vanhoof, E., De Bruyn, P., Aerts, W., Verelst, J.: Comparing the usefulness of the REA model and normalized systems theory for accounting information systems design (unpublished working paper)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Geerts, G., McCarthy, W.E.: Using object templates from the rea accounting model to engineer business processes and tasks. The Review of Business Information Systems 5(4), 89–108 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mendling, J., Verbeek, H., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W., Neumann, G.: Detection and prediction of errors in epcs of the sap reference model. Data & Knowledge Engineering 64(1), 312–329 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: A configurable reference modelling language. Information Systems 32, 1–23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ekanayake, C.C., La Rosa, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Fauvet, M.-C.: Fragment-Based Version Management for Repositories of Business Process Models. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P., Kumar, A., Reichert, M., Qing, L., Ooi, B.-C., Damiani, E., Schmidt, D.C., White, J., Hauswirth, M., Hitzler, P., Mohania, M.K. (eds.) OTM 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7044, pp. 20–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Uba, R., Dumas, M., García-Bañuelos, L., La Rosa, M.: Clone Detection in Repositories of Business Process Models. In: Rinderle-Ma, S., Toumani, F., Wolf, K. (eds.) BPM 2011. LNCS, vol. 6896, pp. 248–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23059-2_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  37. Mannaert, H., Verelst, J., Ven, K.: Software architectures based on principles and patterns. International Journal of Software Architecture 1(1), 17–18 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Weinberg, G.M.: An Introduction to General Systems Thinking. Wiley (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Normalized Systems Institute, Department of Management Information Systems, Faculty of Applied Economics, University of Antwerp, Belgium

    Peter De Bruyn, Dieter Van Nuffel, Jan Verelst & Herwig Mannaert

Authors
  1. Peter De Bruyn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dieter Van Nuffel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Verelst
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Herwig Mannaert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Information Management, University of St. Gallen, Müller-Friedberg-Strasse 8, 9000, St. Gallen, Switzerland

    Antonia Albani

  2. University of Madeira, Funchal, Portugal

    David Aveiro

  3. Faculty of Technology, Delft University of Technology, 2628 BX, Delft, The Netherlands

    Joseph Barjis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

De Bruyn, P., Van Nuffel, D., Verelst, J., Mannaert, H. (2012). Towards Applying Normalized Systems Theory Implications to Enterprise Process Reference Models. In: Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Barjis, J. (eds) Advances in Enterprise Engineering VI. EEWC 2012. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 110. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29903-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29903-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29902-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29903-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation