Skip to main content

Negotiation and Auction Mechanisms: Two Systems and Two Experiments

  • Conference paper
E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life (WEB 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 108))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Auction and negotiation are mechanisms used in market exchanges. Behavioral economics experiments focused on the mechanism efficiency which required highly simplified problems and contexts. This paper discusses an on-going project involving an experimental comparison of auction and negotiation mechanisms embedded in software which we have developed. Both reverse multi-attribute auctions and multi-bilateral negotiations are used in a transportation service procurement scenario. The potential contribution includes the verification of theoretical claims that auctions are more profitable for auction givers than negotiations. It also includes formulation of guidelines for appropriate design of multiattribute market mechanisms and their selection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bichler, M., Kersten, G.E., Strecker, S.: Towards the Structured Design of Electronic Negotiation Media. Group Decision and Negotiation 12, 311–335 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kersten, G.E., Chen, E., Neumann, D., Vahidov, R., Weinhardt, C.: On Comparison of Mechanisms of Economic and Social Exchanges: The Times Model. In: Gimpel, H., Jennings, N., Kersten, G.E., Ockenfels, A., Weinhardt, C. (eds.) Negotiation, Auction and Market Engineering, pp. 16–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Sandholm, T.: Automated Negotiation. The Best for All Concerned. Communication of the ACM 42, 84–85 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beam, C., Segev A., Shanthikumar, J.G.: Electronic Negotiation through Internet-based Auctions. CMIT Working Paper 96-WP-1019, Haas School of Business, University of California (1996), http://haas.berkeley.edu/~citm/WP-1019.PDF

  5. Kumar, M., Feldman, S.I.: Business Negotiation on the Internet. IBM Institute for Advanced Commerce (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ströbel, M.: On Auctions as the Negotiation Paradigm of Electronic Markets. Electronic Markets 10, 39–44 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kraljic, P.: Purchasing Must Become Supply Management. Harvard Business Review 83, 109–117 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Larson, P.D., Carr, P., Dharwall, K.S.: SCM Involving Small versus Large Suppliers: Relational Exchange and Electronic Communication Media. The Journal of Supply Chain Management 41, 18–29 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Handfield, R.B., Straight, S.L.: What Sourcing Channel is Right for You? Supply Chain Management Review 7, 63–68 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Subramanian, G., Zeckhauser, R.: For Sale, but How? Auctions Vs. Negotiations. Negotiation, 3–5 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bajari, P., McMillan, R., Tadelis, S.: Auctions versus Negotiations in Procurement: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 25, 372–399 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Peleg, B.: The Value of Procurement via Online Bidding. Whitepaper, p. 3. CRMTODAY, Athens (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner, S.M., Schwab, A.P.: Setting the Stage for Successful Electronic Reverse Auctions. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management 10, 11–26 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cohn, L.: B2B: The Hottest Net Bet Yet? Business Week (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrin, B.G., Plank, R.E.: Total Cost of Ownership Models: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Supply Chain Management 38, 18–29 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bichler, M., Kalagnanam, J.: Configurable Offers and Winner Determination in Multi-attribute Auctions. European Journal of Operational Research 160, 380–394 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Engelbrecht-Wiggans, R., Haruvy, E., Katok, E.: A Comparison of Buyer-determined and Price-based Multi-attribute Mechanisms. Marketing Science 26, 629–641 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Schoenherr, T., Mabert, V.A.: Online Reverse Auctions: Common Myths versus Evolving Reality. Business Horizons 50, 373–384 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Elmaghraby, W.: Auctions and Pricing in E-marketplaces. In: Simchi-Levi, D., Wu, D., Shen, M. (eds.) Handbook of Quantitative Supply Chain Analysis: Modeling in the E-business Era. Kulwer, Norwell (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Katok, E., Wambach, A.: Collusion in Dynamic Buyer-Determined Reverse Auctions. Management Science (2011) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kagel, J.H., Levin, D.: Auctions: A Survey of Experimental Research, 1995-2010. Handbook of Experimental Economics (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Pontrandolfo, P., Wu, S., Moramarco, R., Kersten, G.E.: Auctions and Negotiations in Transportation Service Procurement. In: Proceedings of Group Decision and Negotiations Conference, pp. 241–252 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kersten, G.E., Pontrandolfo, P., Wu, S.: A Multiattribute Auction Procedure and Its Implementation. In: Proceedings of HICSS 45 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. McAfee, R.P., McMillan, J.: Auctions and Bidding. Journal of Economic Literature 25, 699–738 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Che, Y.-K.: Design Competition through Multidimensional Auctions. RAND Journal of Economics 24, 668–680 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Branco, F.: The Design of Multidimensional Auctions. Rand Journal of Economics 28, 63–81 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Beil, D.R., Wein, L.: An Inverse-optimization-based Auction Mechanisms to Support a Multiattribute RFQ Process. Management Science 49, 1529–1545 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bichler, M.: An Experimental Analysis of Multi-attribute Auctions. Decision Support Systems 29, 249–268 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Anderson, E.T.: Sharing the Wealth: When Should Firms Treat Customers as Partners? Management Science 48, 955–971 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Strecker, S., Seifert, S.: Electronic Sourcing with Multi-attribute Auctions. In: HICSS 37 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Chen-Ritzo, C.H., Harrison, T.P., Kwasnica, A.M., Thomas, D.J.: Better, Faster, Cheaper: An Experimental Analysis of a Multiattribute Reverse Auction Mechanism with Restricted Information Feedback. Management Science 51, 1753–1762 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Davey, A., Olson, D.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making Models in Group Decision Support. Group Decision and Negotiation 7, 55–75 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lim, J.: A Conceptual Framework on the Adoption of Negotiation Support Systems. Information and Software Technology 45, 469–477 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vetschera, R.: Preference Structures and Negotiator Behavior in Electronic Negotiations. Decision Support Systems 44, 135–146 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rangaswamy, A., Shell, G.R.: Using Computers to Realize Joint Gains in Negotiations: Toward an “Electronic Bargaining Table”. Management Science 43, 1147–1163 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Köhne, F., Schoop, M., Staskiewicz, D.: Decision Support in Electronic Negotiation Systems-New challenges. In: DSS Conference (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bulow, J., Klemperer, P.: Auctions versus Negotiations. American Economic Review 86, 80–194 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Firth, A.E.: The Discourse of Negotiation. Studies of Language in the Workplace. Elsevier, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Thomas, C.J., Wilson, B.J.: Verifiable Offers and the Relationship Between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations. The Economic Journal 115, 1016–1031 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Thomas, C.J., Wilson, B.J.: A Comparison of Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations. The RAND Journal of Economics 33, 140–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Thomas, C.J., Wilson, B.J.: Verifiable Offers and the Relationship Between Auctions and Multilateral Negotiations. Economic Journal 115, 1016–1031 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Strecker, S., Kersten, G.E., Kim, J.B., Law, K.P.: Electronic Negotiation Systems: The Invite Prototype. In: Proceedings of the Collaborative Business MKWI 2006, pp. 315–331. GITO (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kersten, G.E., Wu, S., Szapiro, T.: A Procedure for Multiattribute Reverse Auctions with two Strategic Parameters. InterNeg Report INR3/11. Concordia University (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kersten, G.E., Pontrandolfo, P., Vahidov, R., Gimon, D. (2012). Negotiation and Auction Mechanisms: Two Systems and Two Experiments. In: Shaw, M.J., Zhang, D., Yue, W.T. (eds) E-Life: Web-Enabled Convergence of Commerce, Work, and Social Life. WEB 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 108. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29873-8_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29872-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29873-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics