Abstract
Climate change adaptation has been called a “wicked problem par excellence.” Wicked problems are hard to define because ‘the formulation of the problem is the problem; they are considered a symptom of another problem; they are highly resistant to solutions and extremely interconnected with other problems. Climate change problems are even more complex because they lack a well-structured policy domain, and knowledge about climate change is uncertain and contested. Given the wicked characteristics of the climate issue and its particular challenges, the question is which theories are useful starting points for the governance of climate adaptation? The chapter distinguishes between theories and concepts that focus on reflexivity, on resilience, on responsiveness and on revitalisation. Instead of integrating these theories in one overarching governance approach, the chapter suggests an approach of theoretical multiplicity. It proposes that exploiting the variety of concepts and strategies based on the different theories can increase the governance capacity to deal with climate change. Finally, it addresses the moral dimension of wicked problems, which suggests that it is unacceptable to treat a wicked problem as though it were a tame one. Governance scholars nowadays risk raising expectations far beyond their ability to deliver, and thus enhance confusions over whether wicked problems are in fact tame ones.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arvai, J., Bridge, G., Dolsak, N., Franzese, R., Koontz, T., Luginbuhl, A., et al. (2006). Adaptive management of the global climate problem: Bridging the gap between climate research and climate policy. Climatic Change, 78(1), 217–225.
Brugnach, M., Henriksen, H. J., Van Der Keur, P., & Mysiak, J. (2009). Uncertainty and adaptive water management. Concepts and guidelines. Osnabrück: University of Osnabrück.
Brunner, R., Steelman, T., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C., Edwards, C., & Tucker, D. (2005). Adaptive governance. New York: Columbia University Press.
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 10(1), 103–126.
Churchman, C. W. (1969). Free for all. Management Science, 14(1), 141–146.
Davoudi, S., Crawford, J., & Mehmood, A. (2009). Planning for climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners. London: Earthscan/James & James.
Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., et al. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193.
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–473.
Gioia, D. A., & Pitre, E. (1990). Multiparadigm perspectives on theory building. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 584–602.
Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating. Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J., Meijerink, S., van den Brink, M., Jonge, P., et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: A method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–471.
Head, B. W. (2008). Wicked problems in public policy. Public Policy, 3(2), 101–118.
Huitema, D., Aerts, J. & van Asselt, H. (2008). Adaptive governance in climate change. The cases of the international climate change regime and water management the Netherlands. In: V. Grover (Ed.), Global warming and climate change: Kyoto, ten years and still counting (pp. 527–561). Enfield: Science Publishers.
Hulme, M. (2009). Why we disagree about climate change: understanding controversy, inaction and opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huxham, C. (2000). The challenge of collaborative governance. Public Management, 2(3), 337–357.
IPCC. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the IPCC. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jordan, A., Huitema, D., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., & Berkhout, F. (Eds.). (2010). Climate change policy in the European Union: confronting the dilemmas of mitigation and adaptation. Cambridge: University Press.
Klijn, E., & Koppenjan, J. (2000). Public management and policy networks: foundations of a network approach to governance. Public Management, 2(2), 135–158.
La Porte, T. R. (1996). High reliability organizations: unlikely, demanding and at risk. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 4(2), 60–71.
Nerlich, B. (2010). ‘Climategate’: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis. Environmental Values, 19(4), 419–442.
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21, 49–62.
Putnam, R. (1993). Unlocking organizational routines that prevent learning. The Systems Thinker, 4(6), 2–4.
Rittel, H., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169.
Roberts, N. (2000). Wicked problems and network approaches to resolution. International Public Management Review, 1(1), 1–19.
Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward a resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor-centered Institutionalism in policy research. Boulder: Westview Press.
Stone, D. (2002). Policy paradox: The art of policy decision making. New York: Norton.
Stripple, J., Rayner, T., Hildingsson, R., Jordan, A., & Haug, C. (2009). Governance choices and dilemmas in a warmer Europe: Exploting the future? In: A. J. D Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, T. Rayner & F. Berkhout (Eds.), Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of adaptation and mitigation? (pp. 229–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Kessener, B. (2007). Revitalizing stagnated policy processes. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 433(2), 232–256.
Termeer, C. J. A. M., Dewulf, A. R. P. J., van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., van Buuren, A., Huitema, D., Meijerink, S., et al. (2011). The regional governance of climate adaptation: A framework for developing legitimate, effective and resilient governance arrangements. Climate Law, 2(2), 159–179.
Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Dewulf, A. (2012). Towards theoretical multiplicity for the governance of transitions: the energy producing greenhouse case. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 15(1/2), 37–53.
True, J. L., Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2007). Punctuated equilibrium theory: explaining stability and change in policymaking. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 155–187). Colorado: Westview Press.
Van Bueren, E. M., Klijn, E. H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13(2), 193–212.
van Nieuwaal, K., Driessen, P., Spit, T., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2009). A state of the art of governance literature on adaptation to climate change: towards a research agenda. Kennis voor Klimaat: KfC 003/2009.
Verweij, M., Douglas, M., Ellis, R., Engel, C., Hendriks, F., Lohmann, S., et al. (2006). Clumsy solutions for a complex world. The case of climate change. Public Administration, 84(4), 817–834.
Walker, B., Carpenter, S., Anderies, J., Abel, N., Cumming, G., Janssen, M., et al. (2002). Resilience management in social-ecological systems: a working hypothesis for a participatory approach. Conservation Ecology, 6, 14.
Weber, E., & Khademian, A. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.
Weick, K. E., & Sutcliffe, K. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Weick, K. E., & Westley, F. (1996). Organizational learning: Affirming an oxymoron. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. London: Sage.
Wexler, M. N. (2009). Exploring the moral dimension of wicked problems. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(9/10), 531–542.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., Breeman, G. (2013). Governance of Wicked Climate Adaptation Problems. In: Knieling, J., Leal Filho, W. (eds) Climate Change Governance. Climate Change Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29831-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29831-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29830-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29831-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)