Abstract
Urban fabric characterization is very useful in urban design, planning, modeling and simulation. It is traditionally considered as a descriptive task mainly based on visual inspection of urban plans. Cartographic databases and geographic information systems (GIS) capabilities make possible the analytical formalization of this issue. This paper proposes a renewed approach to characterize urban fabrics using buildings’ footprints data. This characterization method handles both architectural form and urban open space morphology since urban space can be intuitively and simply divided into built-up areas (buildings) and non-built-up areas (open spaces). First, we propose to build a mesh of the open space (a morphologic tessellation) and then we formalize relevant urban morphology properties and translate them into a set of indicators (using some common-used indispensable indicators and proposing a new formulation or generalization of a few others). This first step produces a highly dimensional data set for each footprint characterizing both the building and its surrounding open space. This data set is then reduced and classified using a spatial clustering process, the self-organizing maps in this case. Our method only requires buildings’ footprints as input data. It can be applied on huge datasets and is independent from urban contexts. The results show that the classification produced is more faithful to ground truth (highlighting the variety of urban morphologic structures) than traditional descriptive characterizations generally lacking open space properties.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bação F., Lobo V., Painho M., 2005, “The self-organizing map, the Geo- SOM, and relevant variants for geosciences”, Computers and Geosciences, 31(2), 155-163.
Benedict M L., 1979, “To take hold of space: isovists and isovist fields”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 6, 47-65.
Berghauser-Pont I., Haupt P., 2007, “The Spacemate: density and the typomorphology of the urban fabric”, Urbanism laboratory for cities and regions: progress of research issues in urbanism.
Boffet A., Serra S.R., 2001, “Identification of spatial structures within urban blocks for town characterization”, 20th International Cartographic Conference.
Couclelis H., 1992, “People Manipulate Objects (but Cultivate Fields): Beyond the Raster-Vector Debate in GIS”. In Frank, A. U., Campari, I., and Formentini, U., editors, Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Space, International Conference GIS - From Space to Territory: Theories and Methods of Spatio-Temporal Reasoning, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 65-77, Pisa, Italy. Springer.
Fisher-Gewirtzman D., Wagner I. A., 2003, “Spatial openness as a practical metric for evaluating built-up environments”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30(1), 37-49.
Henriques R., Bação F., Lobo V., 2009, “GeoSOM Suite: A Tool for Spatial Clustering”, Computational Science and Its Applications: ICCSA.
Hillier B., 1987, “La morphologie de l’espace urbain : l’évolution de l’approche syntaxique”, Architecture et Comportement, 3(3), 205-216.
Kohonen T., 2001, “Self-Organizing maps”, third ed, Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg 501 pp.
Krüger E.L., Minella F.O., Rasia F., 2011, “Impact of urban geometry on outdoor thermal comfort and air quality from field measurements in Curitiba, Brazil”, Building and Environment, 46, 621-634.
Landsberg H.E., 1981, “The urban climate”, Academic Press (New York), 275p.
Puissant A. Skupinski G., Lachiche N., Braud A., Perret J., 2010, “Classification des tissus urbains à partir de données vectorielles - application à Strasbourg”, Spatial Analysis and GEOmatics: SAGEO’10, 198-211.
Souza R., Rodrigues D., Mendes J., 2003, “Sky view factors estimation using a 3D-GIS extension”, Eighth International IBPSA Conference.
Stamps A. E., 2005, “Isovists, enclosure, and permeability theory”, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32(5), 735-762.
Thomas I., Frankhauser P., Keersmaecker M.L., 2007, “Fractal dimension versus density of built-up surfaces in the periphery of Brussels”, Papers in Regional Science, 2(06), 287-308.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hamaina, R., Leduc, T., Moreau, G. (2012). Towards Urban Fabrics Characterization Based on Buildings Footprints. In: Gensel, J., Josselin, D., Vandenbroucke, D. (eds) Bridging the Geographic Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29063-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29063-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-29062-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-29063-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)