Skip to main content

A Review of Fauna Used in Zootherapeutic Remedies in Portugal: Historical Origins, Current Uses, and Implications for Conservation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine

Abstract

Portugal has a very rich ethnozoological heritage due to its rich biodiversity, history, and culture. However, there are very few works dedicated to this, and little is known about the zootherapeutic remedies used in Portugal. Due to its location in a biodiversity hotspot, its agro-pastoralist traditions and also its role during the maritime discoveries of the Renaissance, Portugal has a long list of animals and animal parts that have been used in its folk medicine. These uses can still be found in many historical documents and pharmacopeias. Although these uses started to decline in the nineteenth century, many of them survived, being passed from generation to generation by oral tradition, and are still used by local populations. We can still find 225 remedies, using 54 animal species, mainly domestic animals and common species, in use in modern day Portugal. The use of some animals in traditional medicine, such as Lataste’s viper, the Iberian wolf, and the European pond turtle, can be an additional pressure on these already endangered species. Studies are much needed to better understand zootherapeutic uses in Portuguese folk medicine and their implications for conservation. This chapter intends to be a starting point to these future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Álvares F (2004) O lobo o imaginário popular. In: Nunes M (ed) Serra da Aboboreira—a terra, o homem e os lobos. Câmara Municipal de Amarante, Amarante

    Google Scholar 

  • Alves RRN, Rosa IL (2005) Why study the use of animal products in traditional medicines. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-1-5

  • Alves RRN, Rosa IL, Santana GG (2007) The role of animal-derived remedies as complementary medicine in Brazil. Bioscience 57(11):949–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alves RRN, Vieira WLS, Santana GG (2008) Reptiles used in traditional folk medicine: conservation implications. Biodivers Conserv 17(8):2037–2049. doi:10.1007/s10531-007-9305-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bethencourt F (1987) O Imaginário da Magia—feiticeiras, saludadores e nigromantes no séc, vol XVI. Universidade Aberta, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigola JCP (2002) Colecções, Gabinetes e Museus em Portugal no Século XVIII. Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian/Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Brito JC, Rebelo A, Crespo EG (2001) Viper killings for superstitious reasons in Portugal. Boletin de la Asociacion Herpetologica Espñola 12:101–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabral MJ et al (2006) Livro vermelho dos vertebrados de Portugal. Assírio e Alvim, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Campos A (1993) Víboras em saldo. Tal e Qual 21(05/93):17

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceríaco LMP (2010a) Gecko’s folklore in portuguese oral tradition. In: Conde SP (ed) Proceedings of the international conference on oral tradition, Concello de Ourense, Ourense

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceríaco LMP (2010b) Human attitudes towards herpetofauna. Dissertation, University of Évora, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceríaco LMP, Marques MM, Madeira NC, Vila-Viçosa CMM, Mendes P (2011) Folklore and traditional ecological knowledge of Geckos in Southern Portugal: implications for conservation and science. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7(26):1–10. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-7-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Coelho MR (1760) Pharmacopea tubalense. Officina Balio Geredini, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox N, Chanson J, Suart S (2006) The status and distribution of reptiles and amphibians of the Mediterranean Basin, 1st edn. IUCN, Gland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida AG, Magalhães M, Guimarães AP (2009) Artes de cura e espanta-males—Espólio de medicina popular recolhido por Michel Giacometti, 1st edn. Gradiva, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Felgueiras G (1956) Os batráquios no conceito popular e na superstição. Acta do Primeiro Congresso de Etnografia e Folclore de Braga 2:65–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira JB (1935) O ofidismo no seu aspecto histórico e actual, 1st edn. Academia de Ciências de Lisboa, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald LA, Painter CW, Reuter A, Hoover C (2004) Collection, trade, and regulation of reptiles and amphibians of the Chihuahuan Desert ecoregion. TRAFFIC North America World Wildlife Fundo, Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Fontes A, Sanches JG (2000) Medicina Popular—Ensaio de Antropologia Médica. Âncora Editora, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Frazão-Moreira A, Fernandes MM (2006) Plantas e saberes. No limiar da etnobotânica em Portugal. Edições Colibri, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriques FF (1731) Medicina Lusitana. Caza Miguel Diaz, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev E (2002) Traditional healing with animals (zootherapy): medieval to present-day Levantine practice. J Ethnopharmacol 85:107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lobo E (1995) A doença e a cura: recorrência à bruxaria na procura de saúde, 1st edn. Estratégias Criativas Vila Nova de Gaia, Portugal

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro J (1790) Flora cochinchinensis. 1 edn. Typis, et Expensis Academicis, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahawar M, Jaroli DP (2008) Traditional zootherapeutic studies in India: a review. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 4(17):1–12. doi:10.1186/1746-4269-4-17

    Google Scholar 

  • Mantero I (1998) Portugal Misterioso. Reader’s Digest, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques JGW (1997) Fauna medicinal: Recurso do ambiente ou ameaça à biodiversidade. Mutum 1:1–4

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:858–858

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre AF (1928) Animais venenosos de Portugal. Instituto de zoologia da Universidade do Porto, Porto

    Google Scholar 

  • Novais MH, Santos I, Mendes S, Pinto-Gomes C (2004) Studies on pharmaceutical ethnobotany in Arrabida Natural Park (Portugal). J Ethnopharmacol 93:183–195

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Quave CL, Lohani U, Verde A, Fajardo J, Rivera D, Obón C, Valdes A, Pieroni A (2010) A comparative assessment of zootherapeutic remedies from selected areas in Albania, Italy, Spain and Nepal. J Ethnobiol 30:92–125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramstad KM, Nelson NJ, Paine G, Beech D, Paul A, Paul P, Allendorf FW, Daugherty CH (2007) Species and cultural conservation in New Zealand: Maori traditional ecological knowledge of Tuatara. Conserv Biol 21:455–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salgueiro J (2010) Ervas, usos e saberes—Plantas medicinais no Alentejo e outros produtos naturais. Edições Colibri, Lisboa

    Google Scholar 

  • Santo António C (1725) Pharmacopea Lusitana. Real Mosteiro de São Vicente de Fora, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh JS (2002) The biodiversity crisis: a multifaceted review. Curr Sci 82:638–647

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ (2003) Parallel extinction risk and global distribution of languages and people. Nature 423:276–279

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO/IUCN/WWF (1993) Guidelines on conservation of medicinal plants. WHO/IUCN/WWF, Gland

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author first thanks Dr Rômulo Alves and Dr Ierecê Rosa, the editors, for their kind invitation to contribute a chapter to this book. He also thanks Dr Francisco Álvares and all the members of Grupo Lobo for their help and kind contributions of photographs and documents. He thanks Mrs. Susete Ferreira, from Sobral de São Miguel, who kindly gave him the photograph of the viper’s head. He owes special thanks to all of his colleagues who helped with the data collection, during the field surveys and also with the bibliography collection in libraries and archives, especially Mariana Marques. Furthermore, he appreciates all the people they interviewed, who gave their time and precious information about zootherapeutic uses in Portugal.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Miguel Pires Ceríaco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ceríaco, L.M.P. (2013). A Review of Fauna Used in Zootherapeutic Remedies in Portugal: Historical Origins, Current Uses, and Implications for Conservation. In: Alves, R., Rosa, I. (eds) Animals in Traditional Folk Medicine. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29026-8_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics