Abstract
To measure the quality of care in order to identify whether and how it can be improved is of increasing importance, and several organisations define quality indicators as tools for such measurement. The values of these quality indicators should ideally be calculated automatically based on data that is being collected during the care process. The central idea behind this paper is that quality indicators can be regarded as semantic queries that retrieve patients who fulfil certain constraints, and that indicators that are formalised as semantic queries can be calculated automatically by being run against patient data. We report our experiences in manually formalising exemplary quality indicators from natural language into SPARQL queries, and prove the concept by running the resulting queries against self-generated synthetic patient data. Both the queries and the patient data make use of SNOMED CT to represent relevant concepts. Our experimental results are promising: we ran eight queries against a dataset of 300,000 synthetically generated patients, and retrieved consistent results within acceptable time.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Besana, P., Cuggia, M., Zekri, O., Bourde, A., Burgun, A.: Using Semantic Web technologies for Clinical Trial Recruitment. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part II. LNCS, vol. 6497, pp. 34–49. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Broekstra, J., Kampman, A., Van Harmelen, F.: Sesame: A Generic Architecture for Storing and Querying RDF and RDF Schema. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, pp. 54–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Cornet, R., de Keizer, N.: Forty years of SNOMED: a literature review. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 8(suppl 1), S2 (2008)
Dentler, K., Cornet, R., ten Teije, A., de Keizer, N.: Comparison of reasoners for large ontologies in the OWL 2 EL profile. Semantic Web 2, 71–87 (2011)
Donabedian, A.: The Quality of Care: How Can It Be Assessed? JAMA (1988)
Horridge, M., Bechhofer, S.: The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web Journal (to appear), http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/
Kazakov, Y.: Consequence-driven reasoning for horn SHIQ ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Description Logics, pp. 2040–2045 (2009)
Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D., Manov, D.: OWLIM – A Pragmatic Semantic Repository for OWL. In: Dean, M., Guo, Y., Jun, W., Kaschek, R., Krishnaswamy, S., Pan, Z., Sheng, Q.Z. (eds.) WISE 2005 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 3807, pp. 182–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Lawrence, M., Olesen, F.: Indicators of Quality in Health Care. European Journal of General Practice 3(3), 103–108 (1997)
Lilford, R., Mohammed, M.A., Spiegelhalter, D., Thomson, R.: Use and misuse of process and outcome data in managing performance of acute medical care: avoiding institutional stigma. Lancet 363(9415), 1147–1154 (2004)
Medlock, S., Opondo, D., Eslami, S., Askari, M., Wierenga, P., de Rooij, S.E., Abu-Hanna, A.: LERM (Logical Elements Rule Method): A method for assessing and formalizing clinical rules for decision support. International Journal of Medical Informatics 80(4), 286–295 (2011)
Palchuk, M.B., Bogdanova, A.A., Jatkar, T., Liu, J., Karmiy, N., Housman, D., Einbinder, J.S.: Automating Quality Reporting with Health Quality Measures Format “eMeasures” and an Analytics Engine. In: AMIA Symposium Proceedings, page 1205 (2010)
Patel, C., Cimino, J., Dolby, J., Fokoue, A., Kalyanpur, A., Kershenbaum, A., Ma, L., Schonberg, E., Srinivas, K.: Matching Patient Records to Clinical Trials Using Ontologies. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 816–829. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Stegers, R., ten Teije, A., van Harmelen, F.: From Natural Language to Formal Proof Goal. In: Staab, S., Svátek, V. (eds.) EKAW 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4248, pp. 51–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Tsarkov, D., Horrocks, I.: FaCT ++ Description Logic Reasoner: System Description
Weng, C., Tu, S.W., Sim, I., Richesson, R.: Formal representation of eligibility criteria: A literature review. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 43(3), 451–467 (2010)
Williams, C.A., Mosley-Williams, A.D., Overhage, J.M.: Arthritis Quality Indicators for the Veterans Administration: Implications for Electronic Data Collection, Storage Format, Quality Assessment, and Clinical Decision Support. In: AMIA Symposium Proceedings, pp. 806–810 (January 2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dentler, K., ten Teije, A., Cornet, R., de Keizer, N. (2012). Towards the Automated Calculation of Clinical Quality Indicators. In: Riaño, D., ten Teije, A., Miksch, S. (eds) Knowledge Representation for Health-Care. KR4HC 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6924. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27697-2_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27696-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27697-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)