Skip to main content

Temporary Belief Sets Management in Adaptive Training Systems

  • Conference paper
Business Information Systems Workshops (BIS 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 97))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper proposes a semantic view on the notion of ,,learning object” and an application model based on RDF-based learning objects and learning processes. Direct feedback is individualized for test subjects and learning tasks, according to requirements defined for corporate training. The knowledge model allows contextualization and subjectivity, which, in turn, are used to dynamically generate temporary belief sets, compare them to the (theoretically) objective belief set underlying the learning content and adapt learning recommendations to each particular user. The semantic models also determine learning prerequisites and the screen flow adapted to each individual learner, thus influencing usability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. The Resource Description Framework, http://www.w3.org/RDF/

  2. Höver, K.M., Steiner, C.M.: Adaptive Learning Environments: A Requirements Analysis in Business Settings. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning 2(3), 27–33 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beck, R.: What are Learning Objects?, http://www4.uwm.edu/cie/learning_objects.cfm?gid=56

  4. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Moodle – the Official Website, http://moodle.org/

  6. Blackboard – the Official Website, http://www.blackboard.com/

  7. The Web Ontology Language, http://www.w3.org/2004/OWL/

  8. Bishop, B.: Primer Introduction to OWLIM, http://www.sirmaitc.com/confluence/display/OWLIM/Primer+Introduction+to+OWLIM

  9. Gonzalez-Videgaray, M., Hernandez-Zamora, G., del Rio-Martinez, J.H.: Learning Objects in Theory and Practice: A Vision from Mexican University Teachers. Journal Computers & Education 53(4), 1330–1338 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. The IEEE Learning Object Metadata Standard, http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/LOM_1484_12_1_v1_Final_Draft.pdf

  11. Bennacer, N., Bourda, Y., Doan, B.: Formalizing for Querying Learning Objects Using OWL. In: Looi, C.T., Sutinen, E., Sampson, D.G., Aedo, I., Uden, L., Kähkönen, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, pp. 321–325. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Bouzeghoub, A., Defude, B., Ammour, S., Duitama, J.F., Lecocq, C.: A RDF Description Model for Manipulating Learning Objects. In: Looi, C.T., Sutinen, E., Sampson, D.G., Aedo, I., Uden, L., Kähkönen, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2004, pp. 81–85. IEEE Computer Society, Washington (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Ahmed, S., Parsons, D., Ryu, H.: Supporting Adaptive Learning Interactions with Ontologies. In: Ryu, H., Champion, E. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th International Conference of the NZ Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 17–24. ACM Press, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jovanovic, J., Gasevic, D., Devedzic, V.: TANGRAM for Personalized Learning Using the Semantic Web Technologies. Journal of Emerging Technologies in Web Intelligence 1(1), 6–21 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Open RDF Official Website, http://www.openrdf.org/

  16. OWLIM Official Website, http://www.ontotext.com/owlim/

  17. SPARQL Official Website, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  18. The Serialization of SPARQL Query Results in JSON, http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-json-res/

  19. Allemang, D., Hendler, J.: Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. N3 Resources, http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/N3Resources

  21. Defining N-ary Relations on the Semantic Web, http://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/

  22. SPARQL Issues, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/issues#countAggregate

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Buchmann, R.A., Szekely, A., Pulcher, D. (2011). Temporary Belief Sets Management in Adaptive Training Systems. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Węcel, K. (eds) Business Information Systems Workshops. BIS 2011. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 97. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25370-6_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25369-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25370-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics