Abstract
There is growing interest among IT practitioners and academics in Enterprise Architecture (EA) as an effective response to increasingly rapid business, economic, and technological change. EA has been proposed as a path towards better achieving and sustaining stronger business-IT alignment and integration, cost reductions, greater agility, reduced time to market, and other important objectives. Yet there is little theoretical basis to explain how EA work can lead to such achievements; moreover, the creation of a holistic and resilient EA remains an elusive goal for most enterprises. In this paper we use concepts from Actor- Network Theory to highlight some important socio-political and socio-technical aspects of EA work in the context of complex organization situations. Specifically, we focus on such challenges as actor identification in EA negotiations, the importance of soft skills, integration and reconciliation of multiple EA representations, discovering hidden interests and reflecting them in EA representations, dealing with misalignments of interests, as well as creating an environment for continuous EA, and thereby enterprise, improvement.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Brennan, K. (ed.): A Guide to Business Analysis Body of Knowledge, 2nd edn. International Institute of Business Analysis (March 31, 2009)
Callon, M.: Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen. In: Law, J. (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge, pp. 197–225. Routledge, London (1986)
Callon, M., Latour, B.: Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors ma-cro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: Knorr-Cetina, K.D., Cicourel, A.V. (eds.) Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Towards an Integration of Micro and Macro-Sociologies, pp. 277–303. Routledge, London (1981)
Chen, P.P.: The Entity Relationship Model - Toward a Unified View of Data. ACM Transactions on Database Systems 1, 1 (1976)
CIO Council. Federal Enterprise Architecture Framework (FEAF). United States Office of Management and Budget (September 1999)
CIO Council. A Practical Guide to Federal Enterprise Architecture, Version 1. 0, Chief Information Officer Council of OMB and the US General Accountability Office (February 2001), http://www.cio.gov/documents/bpeaguide.pdf (January 1, 2011)
Collett, S.: Hot Skills, Cold Skills. Computerworld (July 17, 2006), http://computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=112360 (January 1, 2011)
DeMarco, T.: Structured Analysis and System Specification. Yourdon Press, New York (1978)
El Sawy, O., Malhotra, A., Gosain, S., Young, K.: IT-intensive value innovation in the electronic economy: Insights from Marshall Industries. MIS Quarterly 23(3), 305–335 (1999)
Finkelstein, C., Martin, J.: Information Engineering, vol. 1,2. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1981)
Hagan, P.J. (ed.): Guide to the (Evolving) Enterprise Architecture Body of Knowledge. MITRE Corporation, McLean, VA (2004), http://www.mitre.org/work/tech_papers/tech_papers_04/04_0104/04_0104.pdf
Hanseth, O., Jacucci, E., Grisot, M., Aanestad, M.: Reflexive Standardi-zation: Side Effects and Complexity in Standard Making. MIS Quarterly 30 (Special Issue), 563–581 (2006)
Kappelman, L.A.: Bridging the Chasm. Architecture and Governance Magazine 3(2), 28, 35–36 (2007); Also in Kappelman, pp. 35–36 (2010)
Kappelman, L.A. (ed.): The SIM Guide to Enterprise Architecture. CRC Press, NY (2010)
Latour, B.: Where are the missing masses? The sociology of some mundane artifacts. In: Bijker, W.E., Law, J. (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society, pp. 225–258. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)
Latour, B.: Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, New York (2005)
Law, J.: Networks, Relations, Cyborgs: On the Social Study of Technology. Centre for Science Studies, Lancaster University, Lancaster LA1 4YN, UK (2000), http://www.lancs.ac.uk/fass/sociology/papers/law-networks-relations-cyborgs.pdf (January 1, 2011)
Luftman, J.: IT-Business Strategic Alignment Maturity Assessment. Society for Information Management research report, Chicago (October 7, 2003), http://simnet.org
Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R.: An Update on Business-IT Alignment: “A Line” Has Been Drawn. MIS Quarterly Executive 6(3), 165–177 (2007)
Magal, S.R., Word, J.: Essentials of business processes and Infor-mation System. John Wiley and Sons (2009)
Miller, D.: Enterprise client/server planning. Information Systems Management 14(2), 7–15 (1997)
Monteiro, E.: Monsters: From systems to actor-networks. In: Braa, K., Sorenson, C., Dahlbom, B. (eds.) Planet Internet, pp. 239–249. Studentlitteratur, Lund (2000)
Newton, T.: Creating the new ecological order? Elias and actor-network theory. Academy of Management Review 27(4), 523–540 (2002)
Ross, J.W., Weill, P., Robertson, D.: Enterprise architecture as strat-egy creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2006)
Ross, J.W.: Foreword. In: Kappelman, pp. xli-xlii (2010)
Ross, J.W.: Creating a Strategic IT Architecture Competency: Learning in Stages. MISQ Executive 2(1) (2003)
Salmans, B., Kappelman, L.: The State of EA: Progress Not Perfection. In: Kappelman, pp. 165–217 (2010)
Sarker, S., Sarker, S., Sidorova, A.: Understanding Business Process Change Failure: An Actor-Network Perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems 23(1), 51–86 (2003)
Senge, P.: The Fifth Discipline. Doubleday, NY (1990)
Sidorova, A., Kappelman, L.: Enterprise Architecture as Politics: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective. In: Kappelman, 70–88 (2010)
Sidorova, A., Kappelman, L.: Better Business-IT Alignment through Enterprise Architecture: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective. Journal of Enterprise Architecture, 39–47 (February 2011)
Simons, G., Kappelman, L., Zachman, J.: Enterprise Architecture as Language. In: Aiguer, M., Bretaudeau, F., Krob, D. (eds.) Complex Systems Design and Management. Springer, Berlin (2010); Also in Kappelman pp. 127-146 (2010)
Venkatesh, V., Bala, H., Venkatraman, S., Bates, J.: Enterprise Architec-ture Maturity: The Story of the Veterans Health Administration. MISQ Executive 6(2), 79–90 (2007)
Walsham, G.: Actor-network theory and IS research: Current status and future prospects. In: Lee, A.S., Liebenau, J., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Information Systems and Qualitative Research, pp. 466–480. Chapman and Hall, London (1997)
Walsham, G., Sahay, S.: GIS for district-level administration in In-dia: Problems and opportunities. MIS Quarterly 23(1), 39–66 (1999)
Yourdon, E.: Techniques of Program Structure and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1975)
Zachman, J.A.: A Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 26(3), 276–292 (1987)
Zachman, J.A.: John Zachman’s concise definition of the Zachman Framework. In: Kappelman, pp. 61–65 (2010a)
Zachman, J.A.: Architecture is Architecture is Architecture. In: Kappelman, pp. 37–45 (2010b)
Zachman, J.A., Sowa: Extending and Formalizing the Framework for Information Systems Architecture. IBM Systems Journal 31(3), 590–616 (1992)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sidorova, A., Kappelman, L. (2012). Realizing the Benefits of Enterprise Architecture: An Actor-Network Theory Perspective. In: Hammami, O., Krob, D., Voirin, JL. (eds) Complex Systems Design & Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25203-7_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-25203-7_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-25202-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-25203-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)