Skip to main content

Handling Sequential Observations in Intelligent Surveillance

  • Conference paper
Scalable Uncertainty Management (SUM 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6929))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Demand for intelligent surveillance in public transport systems is growing due to the increased threats of terrorist attack, vandalism and litigation. The aim of intelligent surveillance is in-time reaction to information received from various monitoring devices, especially CCTV systems. However, video analytic algorithms can only provide static assertions, whilst in reality, many related events happen in sequence and hence should be modeled sequentially. Moreover, analytic algorithms are error-prone, hence how to correct the sequential analytic results based on new evidence (external information or later sensing discovery) becomes an interesting issue. In this paper, we introduce a high-level sequential observation modeling framework which can support revision and update on new evidence. This framework adapts the situation calculus to deal with uncertainty from analytic results. The output of the framework can serve as a foundation for event composition. We demonstrate the significance and usefulness of our framework with a case study of a bus surveillance project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bacchus, F., Halpern, J., Levesque, H.: Reasoning about noisy sensors and effectors in the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence 111(1-2), 171–208 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bsia: Florida school bus surveillance, http://www.bsia.co.uk/LY8VIM18989_action;displaystudy_sectorid;LYCQYL79312_caseid;NFLEN064798

  3. De Giacomo, G., Levesque, H.: Progression using regression and sensors. In: Procs. of IJCAI, pp. 160–165 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Herzig, A., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Action representation and partially observable planning using epistemic logic. In: Procs. of IJCAI, pp. 1067–1072 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lakemeyer, G., Levesque, H.: A semantic characterization of a useful fragment of the situation calculus with knowledge. Artificial Intelligence 175(1), 142–164 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Levesque, H.: What is planning in the presence of sensing. In: Procs. of AAAI, pp. 1139–1146 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Liu, W., Miller, P., Ma, J., Yan, W.: Challenges of distributed intelligent surveillance system with heterogenous information. In: Procs. of QRASA, Pasadena, California, pp. 69–74 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ma, J., Liu, W., Benferhat, S.: A belief revision framework for revising epistemic states with partial epistemic states. In: Procs. of AAAI, pp. 333–338 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ma, J., Liu, W., Hunter, A.: Inducing probability distributions from knowledge bases with (in)dependence relations. In: Procs. of AAAI, pp. 339–344 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P.: Event modelling and reasoning with uncertain information for distributed sensor networks. In: Deshpande, A., Hunter, A. (eds.) SUM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6379, pp. 236–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P.: Belief change with noisy sensing in the situation calculus. In: Procs. of UAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P., Yan, W.: Event composition with imperfect information for bus surveillance. In: Procs. of AVSS, pp. 382–387. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy, J.: Situations, Actions and Causal Laws. Stanford University, Stanford (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  14. McCarthy, J., Hayes, P.: Some philosophical problems from the standpoint of artificial intelligence. In: Machine Intelligence, vol. 4, pp. 463–502. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Miller, P., Liu, W., Fowler, F., Zhou, H., Shen, J., Ma, J., Zhang, J., Yan, W., McLaughlin, K., Sezer, S.: Intelligent sensor information system for public transport: To safely go.. In: Procs. of AVSS (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ECIT Queen’s University of Belfast. Airport corridor surveillance (2010), http://www.csit.qub.ac.uk/Research/ResearchGroups/IntelligentSurveillanceSystems

  17. US Defense of the Homeland. Washington rail corridor surveillance (2006), http://preview.govtsecurity.com/news/Washington-rail-corridor-surveillance/

  18. US Department of Transportation. Rita - its research program (2010), http://www.its.dot.gov/ITS_ROOT2010/its_program/ITSfederal_program.htm

  19. Reiter, R.: The frame problem in the situation calculus: A simple solution (sometimes) and a completeness result for goal regression. In: Aritificial Intelligence and Mathematical Theory of Computation: Papers in Honor of John McCarthy, pp. 359–380. Academic Press, London (1991)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Scherl, R., Levesque, H.: The frame problem and knowledge-producing actions. In: Procs. of AAAI, pp. 689–695 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Scherl, R., Levesque, H.: Knowledge, action, and the frame problem. Artificial Intelligence 144(1-2), 1–39 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Gardiner Security. Glasgow transforms bus security with ip video surveillance, http://www.ipusergroup.com/doc-upload/Gardiner-Glasgowbuses.pdf

  23. Shapiro, S.: Belief change with noisy sensing and introspection. In: Procs. of NRAC, pp. 84–89 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro, S., Pagnucco, M., Lespérance, Y., Levesque, H.: Iterated belief change in the situation calculus. Artificial Intelligence 175(1), 165–192 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Shet, V.D., Neumann, J., Ramesh, V., Davis, L.S.: Bilattice-based logical reasoning for human detection. In: IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2007, pp. 1–8 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, T., Diao, Q., Zhang, Y., Song, G., Lai, C., Bradski, G.: A dynamic bayesian network approach to multi-cue based visual tracking. In: Procs. of Pattern Recognition, ICPR, pp. 167–170 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ma, J., Liu, W., Miller, P. (2011). Handling Sequential Observations in Intelligent Surveillance. In: Benferhat, S., Grant, J. (eds) Scalable Uncertainty Management. SUM 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6929. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23963-2_43

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23962-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23963-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics