Skip to main content

Handling Partial Preferences in the Belief AHP Method: Application to Life Cycle Assessment

  • Conference paper
AI*IA 2011: Artificial Intelligence Around Man and Beyond (AI*IA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6934))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper proposes a novel multi-criteria decision making method under uncertainty that combines the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the belief function theory. Our method, named belief AHP, allows the expert to express incomplete and imprecise information about groups of alternatives instead of single ones. On the other hand and in order to judge the importance of criteria, he can also present his opinions on groups of criteria. Then, the uncertainty will be taken into account in the final decision. Finally, another purpose of this paper is also to solve a real application problem which deals with the PVC life cycle assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Basak, I.: Probabilistic judgments specified partially in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research 108, 153–164 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Beynon, M., Curry, B., Morgan, P.: The Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence: An alternative approach to multicriteria decision modelling. OMEGA 28(1), 37–50 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Joaquin, P.: Some comments on the analytic hierarchy process. The Journal of the Operational Research Society 41(6), 1073–1076 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Laarhoven, P.V., Pedrycz, W.: A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 11, 199–227 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Saaty, T.: A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 234–281 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Saaty, T.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Smets, P.: The application of the Transferable Belief Model to diagnostic problems. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 13, 127–158 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the Transferable Belief Model. IEEE Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smets, P.: Transferable Belief Model for expert judgments and reliability problems. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 38, 59–66 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smets, P., Kennes, R.: The Transferable Belief Model. Artificial Intelligence 66, 191–234 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Zeleny, M.: Multiple Criteria Decision Making. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1982)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ennaceur, A., Elouedi, Z., Lefevre, E. (2011). Handling Partial Preferences in the Belief AHP Method: Application to Life Cycle Assessment. In: Pirrone, R., Sorbello, F. (eds) AI*IA 2011: Artificial Intelligence Around Man and Beyond. AI*IA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6934. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23954-0_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23954-0_37

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23953-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23954-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics