Skip to main content

Applying the User-over-Ranking Hypothesis to Query Formulation

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval Theory (ICTIR 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6931))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The User-over-Ranking hypothesis states that the best retrieval performance can be achieved with queries returning about as many results as can be considered at user site[21]. We apply this hypothesis to Lee et al.’s problem of automatically formulating a single promising query from a given set of keywords[16]. Lee et al.’s original approach requires unrestricted access to the retrieval system’s index and manual parameter tuning for each keyword set. Their approach is not applicable on larger scale, not to mention web search scenarios. By applying the User-over-Ranking hypothesis we overcome this restriction and present a fully automatic user-site heuristic for web query formulation from given keywords. Substantial performance gains of up to 60% runtime improvement over previous approaches for similar problems underpin the value of our approach.

Extended version of a paper presented at the TIR 2010 workshop[7].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balasubramanian, N., Kumaran, G., Carvalho, V.R.: Exploring reductions for long web queries. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2010, pp. 571–578 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bar-Yossef, Z., Gurevich, M.: Random sampling from a search engine’s index. Journal of the ACM 55(5) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barker, K., Cornacchia, N.: Using noun phrase heads to extract document keyphrases. In: Proceedings of AI 2000, pp. 40–52 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bendersky, M., Croft, W.B.: Discovering key concepts in verbose queries. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2008, pp. 491–498 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carmel, D., Yom-Tov, E., Darlow, A., Pelleg, D.: What makes a query difficult? In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2006, pp. 390–397 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cronen-Townsend, S., Zhou, Y., Croft, W.B.: Predicting query performance. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2002, pp. 299–306 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hagen, M., Stein, B.: Search strategies for keyword-based queries. In: Proceedings of DEXA 2010 Workshop TIR 2010, pp. 37–41 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hagen, M., Rüb, T., Stein, B.: Query session detection as a cascade. In: Proceedings of ECIR 2011 Workshop SIR 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hauff, C., Hiemstra, D., de Jong, F.: A survey of pre-retrieval query performance predictors. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2008, pp. 1419–1420 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, B., Ounis, I.: Inferring query performance using pre-retrieval predictors. In: Apostolico, A., Melucci, M. (eds.) SPIRE 2004. LNCS, vol. 3246, pp. 43–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Huston, S., Croft, W.B.: Evaluating verbose query processing techniques. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2010, pp. 291–298 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kumaran, G., Allan, J.: Adapting information retrieval systems to user queries. Information Processing and Management 44(6), 1838–1862 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumaran, G., Allan, J.: Effective and efficient user interaction for long queries. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2008, pp. 11–18 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kumaran, G., Carvalho, V.R.: Reducing long queries using query quality predictors. In: Proceedings of SIGIR 2009, pp. 564–571 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lease, M., Allan, J., Croft, W.B.: Regression rank: Learning to meet the opportunity of descriptive queries. In: Boughanem, M., Berrut, C., Mothe, J., Soule-Dupuy, C. (eds.) ECIR 2009. LNCS, vol. 5478, pp. 90–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, C.-J., Chen, R.-C., Kao, S.-H., Cheng, P.-J.: A term dependency-based approach for query terms ranking. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2009, pp. 1267–1276 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Luo, G., Tang, C., Yang, H., Wei, X.: MedSearch: a specialized search engine for medical information retrieval. In: Proceedings of CIKM 2008, pp. 143–152 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pass, G., Chowdhury, A., Torgeson, C.: A picture of search. In: Proceedings of Infoscale, paper. 1 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, J., Taksa, I.: Constructing web search queries from the user’s information need expressed in a natural language. In: Proceedings of SAC 2003, pp. 1157–1162 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stein, B., Hagen, M.: Making the most of a web search session. In: Proceedings of WI-IAT 2010, pp. 90–97 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Stein, B., Hagen, M.: Introducing the user-over-ranking hypothesis. In: Clough, P., Foley, C., Gurrin, C., Jones, G.J.F., Kraaij, W., Lee, H., Mudoch, V. (eds.) ECIR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6611, pp. 503–509. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hagen, M., Stein, B. (2011). Applying the User-over-Ranking Hypothesis to Query Formulation. In: Amati, G., Crestani, F. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval Theory. ICTIR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6931. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23318-0_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23317-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23318-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics