Skip to main content

Amalgam-Based Reuse for Multiagent Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development (ICCBR 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6880))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Different agents in a multiagent system might have different solution quality or preference criteria. Therefore, when solving problems collaboratively using CBR, case reuse must take this into account. In this paper we propose ABARC, a model for multiagent case reuse, which divides case reuse in two stages: individual reuse, where agents generate full solutions internally, and multiagent reuse, where agents engage in a deliberation process in order to reach an agreement on a final solution. Specifically, ABARC is based on the idea of amalgam, which is a way to generate solutions by combining multiple solutions into one. We illustrate ABARC in the domain of interior room design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Carpenter, B.: Typed feature structures: an extension of first-order terms. In: Saraswat, V., Ueda, K. (eds.) Proceedings of the International Symposium on Logic Programming, San Diego, pp. 187–201 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cojan, J., Lieber, J.: Belief merging-based case combination. In: McGinty, L., Wilson, D.C. (eds.) ICCBR 2009. LNCS(LNAI), vol. 5650, pp. 105–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Falkenhainer, B., Forbus, K.D., Gentner, D.: The structure-mapping engine: Algorithm and examples. Artificial Intelligence 41, 1–63 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanks, S., Weld, D.S.: A domain-independent algorithm for plan adaptation. J. Artificial Intelligence Research 2(1), 319–360 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Konieczny, S., Lang, J., Marquis, P.: Da2 merging operators. Artificial Intelligence 157(1-2), 49–79 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Laag, P.R.J., Nienhuys-Cheng, S.H.: Completeness and properness of refinement operators in inductive logic programming. Journal of Logic Programming 34(3), 201–225 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Lavrač, N., Džeroski, S.: Inductive Logic Programming. Techniques and Applications. Ellis Horwood, England (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Leake, D.B., Sooriamurthi, R.: When two case bases are better than one: Exploiting multiple case bases. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 321–335. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. McGinty, L., Smyth, B.: Collaborative case-based reasoning: Applications in personalized route planning. In: Aha, D.W., Watson, I. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 362–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ontañón, S., Plaza, E.: Amalgams: A formal approach for combining multiple case solutions. In: Bichindaritz, I., Montani, S. (eds.) ICCBR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6176, pp. 257–271. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Plaza, E., Arcos, J.L., Martín, F.: Cooperative case-based reasoning. In: Weiss, G. (ed.) ECAI 1996 Workshops. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1221, pp. 180–201. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Plaza, E., Ontañón, S.: Ensemble case-based reasoning: Collaboration policies for multiagent cooperative cbr. In: Watson, I., Yang, Q. (eds.) ICCBR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2080, pp. 437–451. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Prassad, M.V.N., Lesser, V.R., Lander, S.: Retrieval and reasoning in distributed case bases. Tech. rep., UMass Computer Science Department (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ram, A., Francis, A.: Multi-plan retrieval and adaptation in an experience-based agent. In: Leake, D.B. (ed.) Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Directions. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilke, W., Smyth, B., Cunningham, P.: Using configuration techniques for adaptation. In: Lenz, M., Bartsch-Spörl, B., Burkhard, H.-D., Wess, S. (eds.) Case-Based Reasoning Technology. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1400, pp. 139–168. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Ashwin Ram Nirmalie Wiratunga

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Manzano, S., Ontañón, S., Plaza, E. (2011). Amalgam-Based Reuse for Multiagent Case-Based Reasoning. In: Ram, A., Wiratunga, N. (eds) Case-Based Reasoning Research and Development. ICCBR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6880. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23291-6_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23291-6_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23290-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23291-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics