Abstract
Agentization is the process of rendering neoclassical models into computational ones. This methodological tool can be used to analyze and test neoclassical theories under a more flexible computational framework. This paper presents agentization and its methodological framework. We propose that, by classifying the assumptions of a neoclassical model, it is possible to systematically analyze their influence in the predictions of a theory. Furthermore, agentization allows the researcher to explore the potentials and limitations of theories. We present an example by agentizing the model of Gabaix (1999) for the emergence of Zipf laws. We show that the agentized model is able to reproduce the main features of the Gabaix process, without holding neoclassical assumptions such as equilibrium, rationality, agent homogeneity, and centralized anonymous interactions. Additionally, the model generates stylized facts such as tent-shaped firm growth rates distributions, and the employer-size wage premium. These regularities are not considered in the neoclassical model. Thus, allows the researcher to explore the boundaries and potentials of the theory.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Axtell, R. (2005). The complexity of exchange. The Economic Journal, 115(504):F193–F210.
Axtell, R. (2007). What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(2-3):105–122.
Axtell, R. and Epstein, J. (2006). Coordination in transient social networks: an agent-based computational model of the timing of retirement. Generative social science: studies in agentbased computational modeling, page 146.
Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1989). The employer Size-Wage effect. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 2870.
Brown, J. (1989). Why do wages increase with tenure? On-the-Job training and Life-Cycle wage growth observed within firms. The American Economic Review, 79(5):971–991.
Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739–767.
Gibrat, R. (1931). Les In´egalit´es Economiques. Sirey, Paris.
Levy, M. and Solomon, S. (1996). Power laws are logarithmic boltzmann laws.
Peracchi, F. and Welch, F. (1994). Trends in labor force transitions of older men and women. Journal of Labor Economics, 12(2):210–242.
Saichev, A., Malevergne, Y., and Sornette, D. (2009). Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond. Springer, 1st edition. edition.
Simon, H. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(3-4):425–440.
Simon, H. (1960). Some further notes on a class of skew distribution functions. Information and Control, 3(1):80–88.
Stanley, M., Amaral, L., Buldyrev, S., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M., and Stanley, H. (1996). Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature, 379(6568):804 –806.
Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Guerrero, O.A., Axtell, R.L. (2011). Using Agentization for Exploring Firm and Labor Dynamics. In: Osinga, S., Hofstede, G., Verwaart, T. (eds) Emergent Results of Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 652. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21107-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21108-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)