Skip to main content

Using Agentization for Exploring Firm and Labor Dynamics

A Methodological Tool for Theory Exploration and Validation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Emergent Results of Artificial Economics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 652))

Abstract

Agentization is the process of rendering neoclassical models into computational ones. This methodological tool can be used to analyze and test neoclassical theories under a more flexible computational framework. This paper presents agentization and its methodological framework. We propose that, by classifying the assumptions of a neoclassical model, it is possible to systematically analyze their influence in the predictions of a theory. Furthermore, agentization allows the researcher to explore the potentials and limitations of theories. We present an example by agentizing the model of Gabaix (1999) for the emergence of Zipf laws. We show that the agentized model is able to reproduce the main features of the Gabaix process, without holding neoclassical assumptions such as equilibrium, rationality, agent homogeneity, and centralized anonymous interactions. Additionally, the model generates stylized facts such as tent-shaped firm growth rates distributions, and the employer-size wage premium. These regularities are not considered in the neoclassical model. Thus, allows the researcher to explore the boundaries and potentials of the theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Axtell, R. (2005). The complexity of exchange. The Economic Journal, 115(504):F193–F210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Axtell, R. (2007). What economic agents do: How cognition and interaction lead to emergence and complexity. The Review of Austrian Economics, 20(2-3):105–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axtell, R. and Epstein, J. (2006). Coordination in transient social networks: an agent-based computational model of the timing of retirement. Generative social science: studies in agentbased computational modeling, page 146.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, C. and Medoff, J. (1989). The employer Size-Wage effect. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 2870.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, J. (1989). Why do wages increase with tenure? On-the-Job training and Life-Cycle wage growth observed within firms. The American Economic Review, 79(5):971–991.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gabaix, X. (1999). Zipf’s law for cities: An explanation. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(3):739–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les In´egalit´es Economiques. Sirey, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Levy, M. and Solomon, S. (1996). Power laws are logarithmic boltzmann laws.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peracchi, F. and Welch, F. (1994). Trends in labor force transitions of older men and women. Journal of Labor Economics, 12(2):210–242.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Saichev, A., Malevergne, Y., and Sornette, D. (2009). Theory of Zipf’s Law and Beyond. Springer, 1st edition. edition.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Simon, H. (1955). On a class of skew distribution functions. Biometrika, 42(3-4):425–440.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simon, H. (1960). Some further notes on a class of skew distribution functions. Information and Control, 3(1):80–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley, M., Amaral, L., Buldyrev, S., Havlin, S., Leschhorn, H., Maass, P., Salinger, M., and Stanley, H. (1996). Scaling behaviour in the growth of companies. Nature, 379(6568):804 –806.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zipf, G. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar A. Guerrero .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guerrero, O.A., Axtell, R.L. (2011). Using Agentization for Exploring Firm and Labor Dynamics. In: Osinga, S., Hofstede, G., Verwaart, T. (eds) Emergent Results of Artificial Economics. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 652. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21108-9_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21107-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21108-9

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics