Skip to main content

Weight Constraints with Preferences in ASP

  • Conference paper
Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning (LPNMR 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6645))

Abstract

Weight and cardinality constraints constitute a very useful programming construct widely adopted in Answer Set Programming (ASP). In recent work we have proposed RASP, an extension to plain ASP where complex forms of preferences can be flexibly expressed. In this paper, we illustrate an application of these preferences within weight/cardinality constraints. We emphasize, mainly by simple examples, the usefulness of the proposed extension. We also show how the semantics for ASP with weight constraints can be suitably extended so as to encompass RASP-like preferences, without affecting complexity.

This research is partially supported by PRIN-08 and GNCS-11. Material from this manuscript composes a poster presentation at Commonsense-2011 [2].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Capotorti, A., Formisano, A.: Comparative uncertainty: theory and automation. Mathematical Structures in Computer Science 18(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Costantini, S., Formisano, A.: Augmenting weight constraints with complex preferences. In: Proc. of Commonsense 2011. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Costantini, S., Formisano, A., Petturiti, D.: Extending and implementing RASP. Fundamenta Informaticae 105(1-2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Delgrande, J., Schaub, T., Tompits, H., Wang, K.: A classification and survey of preference handling approaches in nonmonotonic reasoning. Computational Intelligence 20(12) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gelfond, M., Lifschitz, V.: The stable model semantics for logic programming. In: Proc. of the ICLP/SLP 1988. MIT Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simons, P., Niemelä, I., Soininen, T.: Extending and implementing the stable model semantics. Artificial Intelligence 138(1-2) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Van Nieuwenborgh, D., Vermeir, D.: Preferred answer sets for ordered logic programs. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 6(1-2) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Costantini, S., Formisano, A. (2011). Weight Constraints with Preferences in ASP. In: Delgrande, J.P., Faber, W. (eds) Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning. LPNMR 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6645. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20895-9_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20894-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20895-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics