Skip to main content

Evolving Art Using Multiple Aesthetic Measures

  • Conference paper
Applications of Evolutionary Computation (EvoApplications 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6625))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the applicability of Multi-Objective Optimization (MOO) in Evolutionary Art. We evolve images using an unsupervised evolutionary algorithm and we use two aesthetic measures as fitness functions concurrently. We use three different pairs from a set of three aesthetic measures and we compare the output of each pair to the output of other pairs, and to the output of experiments with a single aesthetic measure (non-MOO). We investigate 1) whether properties of aesthetic measures can be combined using MOO and 2) whether the use of MOO in evolutionary art results in different images, or perhaps “better” images. All images in this paper can be viewed in colour at http://www.few.vu.nl/~eelco/

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. del Acebo, E., Sbert, M.: Benford’s law for natural and synthetic images. In: Neumann, L., et al. (eds.) [10], pp. 169–176

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bentley, P.J., Corne, D.W. (eds.): Creative Evolutionary Systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast elitist multi-objective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Greenfield, G.R.: Mathematical building blocks for evolving expressions. In: Sarhangi, R. (ed.) 2000 Bridges Conference Proceedings, pp. 61–70. Central Plain Book Manufacturing, Winfield (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Greenfield, G.R.: Evolving aesthetic images using multiobjective optimization. In: Sarker, R., Reynolds, R., Abbass, H., Tan, K.C., McKay, B., Essam, D., Gedeon, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 2003 Congress on Evolutionary Computation CEC 2003, pp. 1903–1909. IEEE Press, Canberra (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. den Heijer, E., Eiben, A.: Comparing aesthetic measures for evolutionary art. In: Di Chio, C., Brabazon, A., Di Caro, G.A., Ebner, M., Farooq, M., Fink, A., Grahl, J., Greenfield, G., Machado, P., O’Neill, M., Tarantino, E., Urquhart, N. (eds.) EvoApplications 2010. LNCS, vol. 6025, pp. 311–320. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. den Heijer, E., Eiben, A.: Using aesthetic measures to evolve art. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2010), Barcelona (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Matkovic, K., Neumann, L., Neumann, A., Psik, T., Purgathofer, W.: Global contrast factor-a new approach to image contrast. In: Neumann, L., et al. (eds.) [10], pp. 159–168

    Google Scholar 

  9. McCormack, J.: Open problems in evolutionary music and art. In: Rothlauf, F., Branke, J., Cagnoni, S., Corne, D.W., Drechsler, R., Jin, Y., Machado, P., Marchiori, E., Romero, J., Smith, G.D., Squillero, G. (eds.) EvoWorkshops 2005. LNCS, vol. 3449, pp. 428–436. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Neumann, L., Sbert, M., Gooch, B., Purgathofer, W. (eds.): Computational Aesthetics 2005: Eurographics Workshop on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging 2005, Girona, Spain, May 18-20. Eurographics Association (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Romero, J., Machado, P. (eds.): The Art of Artificial Evolution: A Handbook on Evolutionary Art and Music. Natural Computing Series. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rooke, S.: Eons of genetically evolved algorithmic images. In: Bentley, P.J., Corne, D.W. (eds.) [2], pp. 339–365

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ross, B., Ralph, W., Zong., H.: Evolutionary image synthesis using a model of aesthetics. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2006), pp. 1087–1094 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ross, B.J., Zhu, H.: Procedural texture evolution using multi-objective optimization. New Gen. Comput. 22(3), 271–293 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sims, K.: Artificial evolution for computer graphics. In: SIGGRAPH 1991: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, vol. 25, pp. 319–328. ACM Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Takagi, H.: Interactive evolutionary computation: Fusion of the capacities of ec optimization and human evaluation. Proceedings of the IEEE 89(9), 1275–1296 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

den Heijer, E., Eiben, A.E. (2011). Evolving Art Using Multiple Aesthetic Measures. In: Di Chio, C., et al. Applications of Evolutionary Computation. EvoApplications 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6625. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20520-0_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20520-0_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20519-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20520-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics