Abstract
The last two decades have seen a revival of interest in teaching formal aspects of language, which, on the one hand, has been motivated by such theoretical positions as the Noticing Hypothesis (Schmidt, Appl Linguist 11:17–46, 1990), the Output Hypothesis (Swain, Principles and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 125–144, 1995), the modified version of the Interaction Hypothesis (Long, Handbook of research on second language acquisition. Academic Press, New York, pp 413–468, 1996) and Skill-Learning Theory (DeKeyser, Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–63, 1998), and, on the other, has been inspired by numerous research findings demonstrating that not only does formal instruction work, but it also contributes to the development of implicit knowledge and its effects are durable. As a consequence, the main issue tackled by researchers has been the verification of the effectiveness of different ways of introducing and practicing grammatical structures, identification of linguistic features that are the most suitable candidates for pedagogic intervention, as well as determination of its optimal timing, intensity and duration (cf. Ellis, TESOL Q 40:83–107, 2006; Nassaji and Fotos, Form-focused instruction and teacher education: studies in honor of Rod Ellis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 7–15, 2007). Even though the results of such studies have provided useful insights into various aspects of form-focused instruction, it should be kept in mind that the value of specific pedagogic solutions is by no means universal since it depends on the perceptions of teachers and learners which are to a large extent culturally determined (e.g. Schultz, Mod Lang J 85:244–258, 2001). In accordance with this assumption, the chapter reports the findings of a research project which set out to compare the views held by advanced Polish and Italian learners of English on different aspects of form-focused instruction. The subjects of the study were 212 participants, 106 from each of the two countries, who filled out questionnaires and participated in interviews. The analysis of the data revealed important differences between the two groups, which indicates that caution should be exercised about embracing recommendations that have not been empirically verified in a specific local context.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Basturkmen H, Loewen S, Ellis R (2004) Teachers’ stated beliefs about incidental focus on form and their classroom practices. Appl Linguist 25:243–272
Borg S (2003) Teacher cognition in grammar teaching: a literature review. Lang Aware 12:96–108
Borg S (2006) Teacher cognition and language education: research and practice. Continuum, London
Borg S, Burns A (2008) Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. TESOL Q 29:456–482
Burgess J, Etherington S (2002) Focus on grammatical form: explicit or implicit? System 30:433–458
DeKeyser RM (1998) Beyond focus on form: cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In: Doughty CJ, Williams J (eds) Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 42–63
DeKeyser RM (2007) The future of practice. In: DeKeyser RM (ed) Practice in a second language: perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 287–304
Dörnyei Z (2005) The psychology of the language learner: individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
Doughty CJ (1998) Acquiring competence in a second language: form and function. In: Byrnes H (ed) Learning foreign and second language: perspectives in research and scholarship. Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp 128–156
Ellis R (1997) SLA research and language teaching. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ellis R (2001) Introduction: investigating form-focused instruction. In: Ellis R (ed) Form-focused instruction and second language learning. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–46
Ellis R (2002) Does form-focused instruction affect the acquisition of implicit knowledge? a review of the research. Stud Second Lang Acquis 24:223–236
Ellis R (2006) Current issues in the teaching of grammar: an SLA perspective. TESOL Q 40:83–107
Ellis R (2008) The study of second language acquisition, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ellis R (2009) Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a second language. In: Ellis R, Loewen S, Elder C, Erlam R, Philp J, Reinders H (eds) Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Multilingual Matters, Bristol, pp 31–64
Griffiths C, Chunhong Z (2008) Researching error correction in China: procedure, product and pitfalls. In: Pawlak M (ed) Investigating English language learning and teaching. Adam Mickiewicz University Press, Poznań–Kalisz, pp 127–137
Grotjahn R (1991) The research programme: subjective theories. Stud Second Lang Acquis 13:187–214
Horwitz EK (1987a) Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In: Wenden AL (ed) Learner strategies in language learning. Prentice Hall, New York, pp 119–129
Horwitz EK (1987b) Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Lang Ann 18:333–340
Horwitz E (1999) Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners’ beliefs about language learning: a review of BALLI studies. System 27:557–576
Hosenfeld C (1978) Students’ mini-theories of second language learning. Assoc Bull 29:2
Kalaja P, Barcelos A (2003) Introduction. In: Kalaja P, Barcelos A (eds) Beliefs about SLA: new research approaches. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 1–4
Kramsch C (2003) Metaphor and the subjective construction of beliefs. In: Kalaja P, Barcelos A (eds) Beliefs about SLA: new research approaches. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 109–128
Krashen S (1982) Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Prentice Hall, New York
Krashen S (1985) The input hypothesis. Longman, London
Larsen-Freeman D (2003) Teaching language: from grammar to grammaring. Thomson and Heinle, Toronto
Larsen-Freeman D (2009) Teaching and testing grammar. In: Long MH, Doughty CJ (eds) The handbook of language teaching. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, pp 518–542
Larsen-Freeman D, Long MH (1991) An introduction to second language acquisition research. Longman, London
Leeman J (2007) Feedback in L2 learning: responding to errors during practice. In: DeKeyser RM (ed) Practice in a second language: perspectives from applied linguistics and cognitive psychology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 111–137
Loewen S, Shaofeng L, Fei F, Thompson A, Nakatsukasa K, Seongmee A, Xiaoqing C (2009) Second language learners’ beliefs about grammar instruction and error correction. Mod Lang J 93:91–104
Long MH (1996) The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In: Ritchie W, Bhatia T (eds) Handbook of research on second language acquisition. Academic Press, New York, pp 413–468
Lyster R, Saito K (2010) Oral feedback in classroom SLA: a meta-analysis. Stud Second Lang Acquis 32:265–302
McCargar D (1993) Teacher and student role expectations: cross-cultural differences and implications. Mod Lang J 77:192–207
Mori Y (1999) Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: what do language learners believe about their learning? Lang Learn 49:377–415
Nassaji H, Fotos S (2007) Issues in form-focused instruction and teacher education. In: Fotos S, Nassaji SH (eds) Form-focused instruction and teacher education: studies in honor of rod ellis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 7–15
Newmark L (1966) How not to interfere in language learning? Int J Am Linguist 32:77–83
Newmark L, Reibel D (1968) Necessity and sufficiency in language learning. Int Rev Appl Linguist Lang Teach 6:145–164
Pawlak M (2004) On the effectiveness of options in teaching grammar: translating theory and research into classroom practice. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia 40:269–287
Pawlak M (2006) The place of form-focused instruction in the foreign language classroom. Adam Mickiewicz University Press, Poznań–Kalisz
Pawlak M (2009a) Factors determining success and failure in the learning of English grammar. In: Barker A, Callahan D, Ferreira A (eds) Success and failure. Uiversidade de Aveiro Departamento de linguas e Culturas, Aveiro, pp 327–338
Pawlak M (2009b) Instructional mode and the use of grammar learning strategies. In: Pawlak M (ed) New perspectives on individual differences in language learning and teaching. Adam Mickiewicz University Press, Poznań–Kalisz, pp 267–290
Pawlak M (2010) Learners’ perspectives on the role of error correction in the foreign language classroom: the importance of space, technique and timing. In: Ciuk A, Mołek-Kozakowska K (eds) Exploring space: spatial notions in cultural, literary and language studies. Volume 2. space in language studies. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Newcastle upon Tyne, pp 316–325
Pawlak M, Droździał-Szelest K (2007) When I think about grammar. exploring English department students’ beliefs about grammar, grammar learning and grammar teaching. In: Pawlak M (ed) Exploring focus on form in language teaching. Adam Mickiewicz University Press, Poznań–Kalisz, pp 299–318
Pazawer A, Wang H (2009) Asian students’ perceptions of grammar teaching in the ESL classroom. Int J Lang Soc Cult 27:27–35
Peacock M (2001) Pre-service ESL teachers’ beliefs about second language learning: a longitudinal study. System 29:177–195
Prabhu NS (1987) Second language pedagogy. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schmidt R (1990) The role of consciousness in second language learning. Appl Linguist 11:17–46
Schulz R (1996) Focus on form in the foreign language classroom: students’ and teachers’ views on error correction and the role of grammar. Foreign Lang Ann 17:195–202
Schulz R (2001) Cultural differences in student and teacher perceptions concerning the role of grammar instruction and corrective feedback: USA-Colombia. Mod Lang J 85:244–258
Spada N (1997) Form-focused instruction and second language acquisition: a review of classroom and laboratory research. Lang Teach Abstr 30:73–87
Spada N, Gass S (1986) The role of learner opinions regarding classroom instruction: a review of research. Pap Appl Linguist 1:11–23
Spada N, Lightbown PM (2008) Form-focused instruction: isolated or integrated? TESOL Q 42:181–208
Spada N, Barkaoui K, Peters C, So M, Valeo A (2009) Developing a questionnaire to investigate second language learners’ preferences for two types of form-focused instruction. System 37:70–81
Swain M (1985) Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In: Gass SM, Madden C (eds) Input in second language acquisition. Newbury House, Rowley, MA, pp 235–253
Swain M (1995) Three functions of output in second language learning. In: Cook G, Seidlhofer GB (eds) Principles and practice in applied linguistics: studies in honor of H. G. Widdowson. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 125–144
Tanaka K, Ellis R (2003) Study abroad, language proficiency, and learner beliefs about language learning. JALT J 25:63–85
Wenden A (1999) An introduction to metacognitive knowledge and beliefs in language learning: beyond the basics. System 27:435–441
Yang N (1999) The relationship between EFL learners’ beliefs and learning strategy use. System 27:515–535
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pawlak, M. (2011). Cultural Differences in Perceptions of Form-Focused Instruction: The Case of Advanced Polish and Italian Learners. In: Arabski, J., Wojtaszek, A. (eds) Aspects of Culture in Second Language Acquisition and Foreign Language Learning. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20201-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20201-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-20200-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-20201-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)