Skip to main content

Evaluating three different model setups in the MIKE 11 NAM model

  • Chapter
Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment

Part of the book series: Environmental Earth Sciences ((EESCI))

Abstract

In this paper, the NAM model was applied in the Strymonas River catchment to simulate the daily discharge that ends up into the Lake Kerkini. In the NAM model, the catchment is represented by four reservoirs, each one representing different physical elements of the catchment. The model uses precipitation, potential evapotranspiration and temperature as driving forces in the simulation of snow accumulation and melting, interception, actual evapotranspiration, overland flow, interflow, groundwater recharge and baseflow. Optimal calibration of the model parameters was obtained for three different model setups by using meteorological and discharge data. The model was also validated against discharge data. The NAM model was used to estimate the continuous Strymonas River mean daily discharge and the results show that the estimation accuracy is depended by the model setup.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • DHI (2009) MIKE 11: A modeling system for rivers and channels. Reference manual. Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Doulgeris Ch, Halkidis I, Papadimos D (2008) Use of modern technology for the protection and management of water resources in Strymonas/Struma River basin. Technical Report, Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY). Thermi, Greece. 82 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerakis PA, Tsiouris S, Tsiaoussi V (2007) Water regime and biota: proposed minimum values of lakes water level and of rivers discharge in Macedonia and Thrace, Greece. The Goulandris Natural History Museum/Greek Biotope-Wetland Centre, Thermi, Greece (in Greek, summary in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Halkidis I, Papadimos D (eds) (2007) Technical report of LIFE Environment project: Ecosystem based water resources management to minimise environmental impacts from agriculture using state-of-the-art modeling tools in Strymonas basin. Greek Biotope/Wetland Centre (EKBY), Thermi, Greece (in Greek, summary in English)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatzispiroglou J, Moussouliotis A, Zissis T, Anastasiadou-Partheniou E (2009) Application of the NAM rainfall-runoff model in hydrological basins of Samos Island. Proceedings of the common Conference of the 11th Hellenic Hydrotechnical Society and of the 7th Conference of the Hellenic Committee of Water Management. 229 - 236 (in Greek)

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskin F, Åžensoy AA, Åžorman A, Åžorman ÃœA (2007) Application of MIKE 11 model for the simulation of snowmelt runoff in Yuvacik dam basin, Turkey. International Congress on River Basin Management, The role of general directorate of state Hydraulic works (DSI) in development of water resources of Turkey. DSI

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause P, Boyle DP, Bäse F (2005) Comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Adv. Geosci. 5, 89-97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H (2000) Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model using multiple objectives. J. Hydrol. 235, 276-288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madsen H, Wilson G, Ammentrop HC (2002) Comparison of different automated strategies for calibration of rainfall-runoff models. J. Hydrol. 261, 48-59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makungo R, Odiyo JO, Ndiritu JG, Mwaka N (2010) Rainfall - runoff modeling approach for ungauged catchments: A case study of Nzhelele River sub-quaternary catchment. Phys. Chem. Earth. 35, 596-607

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinec J, Rango A (1989) Merits of statistical criteria for the performance of hydrological models. Water Resour. Bull. 25(2), 421-432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mutreja KN (1986) Applied hydrology. Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Papamichail DM, Papazafiriou ZG (1992) Multiple input - single output linear functional models for river flow routing. J. Hydrol. 133, 365-377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Refsgaard JC, Knudsen J (1996) Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resour. Res. 32 (7), 2189-2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw EM (1988) Hydrology in practice. Second edition, Chapman and Hall

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Doulgeris, C., Georgiou, P., Papadimos, D., Papamichail, D. (2011). Evaluating three different model setups in the MIKE 11 NAM model. In: Lambrakis, N., Stournaras, G., Katsanou, K. (eds) Advances in the Research of Aquatic Environment. Environmental Earth Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19902-8_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics