Skip to main content

Psychologische Aspekte von Interessenkonflikten

Interessenkonflikte und verzerrte Informationsverarbeitung: Beiträge der Psychologie zur Frage, welchen Einflüssen unser Urteil unterliegt

  • Chapter
Interessenkonflikte in der Medizin

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 149.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Bornstein BH, Emler AC (2001) Rationality in medical decision making: a review of the literature on doctors’ decision-making biases. J Eval Clin Pract 7: 97–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Cialdini, R. B (2004) Die Psychologie des Überzeugens. 3. Aufl. Verlag Hans Huber, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigerenzer G, Gaissmaier W, Kurz-Milcke E et al (2008) Helping doctors and patients make sense of health statistics. Psychol Sci Public Interest 8: 53–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilovich T (1991) How we know what isn’t so: the fallibility of human reason in everyday life. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Sci 85: 1124–1131

    Google Scholar 

Andere zitierte Literatur

  • Berndt C (2008). "Geld beeinflusst mein Urteil nicht". Der neue Vorsitzende der Ständigen Impfkommission, Friedrich Hofmann, zur Unabhängigkeit seines Gremiums. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 26. 1. 2008, S 22

    Google Scholar 

  • Billman D, Bornstein B, Richards, J (1992) Effects of expectancy on assessing covariation in data: „prior belief“ versus „meaning“. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53: 74–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesärztekammer (Hrsg) (2004) Wahrung der ärztlichen Unabhängigkeit bei der Zusammenarbeit mit Dritten. Dtsch Ärztebl 101: A297–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesärztekammer (Hrsg) (2006) (Muster-) Berufsordnung für die deutschen Ärztinnen und Ärzte (Stand 2006), Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger JM, Messian N, Patel S et al (2004) What a coincidence! The effect of incidental similarity on compliance. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 30: 35–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Darley JM, Berscheid E (1967) Increased liking as a result of the anticipation of personal contact. Hum Rel 20: 29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison WP (1983) The third-person effect in communication. Public Opin Quaterly 47: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto PH, Lopez DF (1992) Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. J Pers Soc Psychol 63: 568–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Englich B (2005) Geben Sie ihm doch einfach fünf Jahre. Einflüsse parteiischer Zwischenrufer auf richterliche Urteile. Z Soz Psychol 36: 215–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Englich B, Mussweiler T, Strack F (2006) Playing dice with criminal sentences: The influence of irrelevant anchors on experts’ judicial decision making. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 32: 188–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Epley N, Whitchurch E (2008) Mirror, mirror on the wall: enhancement in self-recognition. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 34, 1159–1170

    Google Scholar 

  • Felser G (2005) Absatzwege. In: Frey D, Rosenstiel L von, Hoyos CG (Hrsg) Wirtschaftspsychologie. Beltz, Weinheim, S 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Felser G (2007) Werbe- und Konsumentenpsychologie 3.Aufl. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske ST, Neuberg SL (1990) A continuum of impression formation from category-based to individuating processing: influences of information and motivation on attention and interpretation. In: Zanna MP (Hrsg) Advances in experimental social psychology Academic Press, Orlando, S 1–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman JL, Fraser SC (1966) Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. J Pers Soc Psychol 4: 196–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugh-Berman A, Ahari S (2007) Following the script. How drug reps make friends and influence Doctors. PLoS Med 4: e150

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansberg M (1964) Thirty-eight who saw murder didn’t call the police. New York Times. 27. März 1964

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert D (1995) Attribution and interpersonal perception. In: Tesser A (Hrsg) Advanced social psychology. McGraw-Hill, New York, S 99–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V (2008) A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J Consumer Res 35: 472–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande D, Frosch DL, Perkins AW, Kahn BE (2009) Effect of exposure to small pharmaceutical promotional items on treatment preferences. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169: 887–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurm HS, Litaker DG (2000) Framing procedural risks to patients: is 99 % safe the same as a risk of 1 in 100? Acad. Med. 75: 840–842.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatfield E, Sprecher S (1986) Mirror, mirror: The importance of looks in everyday life. State University of New York Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard DJ, Gengler C, Jain A (1995) What’s in a name? A complimentary means of persuasion. J Consumer Res 22: 200–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson JW, Henze LS (1969) Campus values in male selection: a replication. J Marriage Fam 31: 772–775

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones EE, Harris VA (1967) The attribution of attitudes. J Exp Soc Psychol 3: 1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda Z (1990) The case for motivated reasoning. Psychol Bull 108: 480–498

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunda Z, Sanitioso R (1989) Motivated changes in the self-concept. J Exp Soc Psychol 25: 272–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Pronin E, Lin DY, Ross L (2002) The bias blind spot: perceptions of bias in self versus others. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 28: 369–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyna VF, Nelson WL, Han PK, Dieckmann NF (2009) How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making. Psychol Bull 135: 943–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards MS, Wierzbicki M (1990) Anchoring errors in clinical-like judgments. J Clin Psychol 1990 46(3): 358–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosen S, Tesser A. (1970) On the reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. Sociometry 33: 253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross L, Greene D, House P (1977) The »false consensus effect«: An egocentric bias in social perception and attribution processes. J Exp Soc Psychol 13: 279–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah S, Loewenstein G (2010) Effect of reminders of personal sacrifice and suggested rationalizations on residents’ self-reported willingness to accept gifts: A randomized trial. JAMA 304: 1204–1211

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman GK, Loewenstein GF, Anderson BL et al (2010) Failure to discount for conflict of interest when evaluating medical literature: a randomised trial of physicians. J Med Ethics 36: 265–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the big muddy: a study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action. Organ Behav Hum Perform 16: 27–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Traut-Mattausch E, Schulz-Hardt S, Greitmeyer T, Frey D (2004) Expectancy confirmation in spite of disconfirming evidence: The case of price increases due to the introduction of the Euro. Eur J Soc Psychol 34: 739–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky A, Kahneman D (1981) The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Sci 211: 453–458

    Google Scholar 

  • van Baaren RB, Holland RW, Kawakami K, Van Knippenberg A (2004) Mimicry and pro-social behavior. Psychol Sci 15: 71–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang AT, McCoy CP, Murad MH, Montori VM (2010) Association between industry affiliation and position on cardiovascular risk with rosiglitazone: cross sectional systematic review. BMJ 340: c1344

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside AD, Davenport JW (1974) The effect of salesman similarity and expertise on consumer purchasing behavior. J Mark Res 11: 198–202

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Felser, G., Klemperer, D. (2011). Psychologische Aspekte von Interessenkonflikten. In: Lieb, K., Klemperer, D., Ludwig, WD. (eds) Interessenkonflikte in der Medizin. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19842-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19842-7_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-19841-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-19842-7

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics