Skip to main content

Some Issues on Clustering of Functional Data

  • Conference paper
Between Data Science and Applied Data Analysis

Abstract

In this paper we address the problem of clustering when for each unit the available response is a smooth function. We propose a novel approach based on a landmark description which takes into account the shape of each function and suggest also a graph-like representation which can help in the classification process. The method is illustrated using a real data set based on precipitation records.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AZENCOTT R. and INGRASSIA S. (1998): Learning planar shapes and neural nets complexity, Tech. Rep. 9822, CMLA at école Normale Supérieure de Cachan.

    Google Scholar 

  • CERIOLI A., INGRASSIA S. and CORBELLINI A. (2002): Symbolic descriptions for clustering of functional data, in preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • DE CARVALHO, F. A. T. (1994): Proximity coefficients between boolean symbolic objects. In: E. Diday et al. (Eds.): New Approaches in Classification and Data Analysis, Springer, Berlin, 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPOSITO F., MALERBA D. and TAMMA V. (2000): Dissimilarity Measures for symbolic objects, in Analysis of Symbolic Data, Bock H.-H. and Diday E. (Eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 165–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • GORDON A.D (1999): Classification, Chapman & Hall, London, 2nd Edition.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • HECKMAN N. and ZAMAR R. (2000): Comparing the shapes of regression functions, Biometrika, 87, 135–144.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • MARRON J.S. and TSYBAKOV A.B. (1995) Visual error criteria for qualitative smoothing, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 499–507.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • RAMSAY J.O. and SILVERMAN B.W. (1997): Functional Data Analysis, SpringerVerlag, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ingrassia, S., Cerioli, A., Corbellini, A. (2003). Some Issues on Clustering of Functional Data. In: Schader, M., Gaul, W., Vichi, M. (eds) Between Data Science and Applied Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40354-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18991-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics