Abstract
In this paper methods to cluster analyze two-mode data are discussed which assume that both objects and attributes contribute to the uncovering of meaningful patterns of clusters. Two-mode methods are reviewed and criteria are proposed which aim at a comparison and evaluation of the reviewed methods. The selected criteria show that most two-mode approaches suffer from drawbacks concerning interpretation of the data, convergence of algorithms, uniqueness of solutions or applicability to larger data sets. They imply some suggestions for future directions in the development of two- and three-mode cluster analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
BAIER, D., GAUL, W. and SCHADER, M. (1997): Two-Mode Overlapping Clustering with Applications to Simultaneous Benefit Segmentation and Market Structuring. In: R. Klar and O. Opitz (Eds.): Classification and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, 557–566.
BOTH, M. and GAUL, W. (1987): Ein Vergleich zweimodaler Clusteranalyseverfahren. Methods of Operations Research, 57, 593–605.
DESARBO, W.S. (1982): Gennclus: New Models for General Nonhierarchical Clustering Analysis. Psychometrika, 47, 449–475.
DE SOETE, G., DeSARBO, W.S., FURNAS, G.W. and CARROLL, J.D. (1984): The Representation of Rectangular Proximity Matrices. In: E. Degreef and J. Van Buggenhaut (Eds.): Trends in Mathematical Psychology. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 377–392.
ESPEJO, E. and GAUL, W. (1986): Two-Mode Hierarchical Clustering as an Instrument for Marketing Research. In: W. Gaul and M. Schader (Eds.): Classification as a Tool of Research. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 121–128.
GANTER, B. and WILLE, R. (1999): Concept Analysis — Mathematical Foundations. Springer, Berlin.
HARTIGAN, J. (1972): Direct Clustering of a Data Matrix. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 123–129.
KROLAK-SCHWERDT, S. and ORLIK, P. (1998): Direct Clustering of a Two-Mode Binary Data Matrix (Report No. 186). Arbeiten der Fachrichtung Psychologie, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken.
KROLAK-SCHWERDT, S., ORLIK, P. and GANTER, B. (1994): Tripat: A Model for Analyzing Three-mode Binary Data. In: H.H. Bock, W. Lenski and M.M. Richter (Eds.): Information Systems and Data Analysis. Springer, Berlin, 298–307.
McCORMICK, W.T., SCHWEITZER, P.J. and WHITE, T.W. (1972): Problem Decomposition and Data Reorganization by a Clustering Technique. Operations Research, 20, 993–1009.
ROSENBERG, S., VAN MECHELEN, I. and DE BOECK, P. (1996): A Hierarchical Classes Model: Theory and Method with Applications in Psychology and Psychopathology. In: P. Arabie, L.J. Hubert and G. De Soete (Eds.): Clustering and Classification. World Scientific Publications, River Edge, 123–155.
SCHWAIGER, M. (1997): Two-Mode Classification in Advertising Research. In: R. Klar and O. Opitz (Eds.): Classification and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, 596–603.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Krolak-Schwerdt, S. (2003). Two-Mode Clustering Methods: Compare and Contrast. In: Schader, M., Gaul, W., Vichi, M. (eds) Between Data Science and Applied Data Analysis. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18991-3_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-40354-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18991-3
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive