Abstract
We consider a political candidate campaigning to be elected. Her chances of being elected will depend on how various groups of voters perceive her, and how they perceive her will depend on what she has said. Different groups of voters may have different preferences and a statement preferred by one group of voters may be disliked by another. Moreover, voters may be optimistic (willing to think the best of the candidate), pessimistic (inclined to expect the worse), or expected value voters, who average over various possibilities which may come about if she is elected. Given these considerations, what should she say? We formalize this problem in propositional logic with certain utility values, and certain intensities of preference for various groups of voters, and show that if the voters are expected value voters, then she is best off being as explicit as possible. Thus a reluctance to be explicit may come about as a result of the presence of optimistic voters.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alchourron, C.E., Gardenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the Logic of Theory Change: Partial Meet Contraction and Revision Functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)
Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1951b); 2nd ed. (1963)
Aumann, R.: Agreeing to Disagree. Annals of Statistics 4, 1236–1239 (1976)
Austin, J.L.: How to Do Things with Words, Oxford (1962)
Bacharach, M.: Some Extensions of a Claim of Aumann in an Axiomatic Model of Knowledge. J. Economic Theory 37, 167–190 (1985)
Brams, S., Fishburn, P.: Approval Voting. Springer, Heidelberg (2007); Originally published in 1983
Cave, J.A.K.: Learning to Agree. Economics Letters 12, 147–152 (1983)
Benz, A., Jäger, G., Van Rooij, R. (eds.): Game Theory and Pragmatics. Palgrave Studies in Pragmatics, Language and Cognition. Macmillan, Palgrave (2005)
Crawford, V.P., Sobel, J.: Strategic information transmission. Econometrica 50(6), 1431–1451 (1982)
van Ditmarsch, H., van der Hoek, W., Kooi, B.: Dynamic Epistemic Logic. Springer’s Synthese Library Series (2008)
Farrell, J., Rabin, M.: Cheap Talk. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 10(3), 103–118 (Summer 1996)
Geanakoplos, J., Polemarchakis, H.: We Can’t Disagree Forever. J. Economic Theory 28, 192–200 (1982)
Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of voting schemes: a general result. Econometrica 41(4), 587–601 (1973)
Grice, P.: Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1989)
Kourousias, G., Makinson, D.: Parallel interpolation, splitting, and relevance in belief change. Journal of Symbolic Logic 72(3), 994–1002 (2007)
Parikh, R.: Belief revision and language splitting. In: Moss, Ginzburg, de Rijke (eds.) Proc. Logic, Language and Computation, CSLI 1999, pp. 266–278 (1999); Earlier version appeared in 1996 in the prliminary proceedings
Parikh, R.: Beth definability, Interpolation and Language Splitting. To appear in the Proceedings of the Beth Symposium, Amsterdam (2009)
Parikh, R., Krasucki, P.: Communication, Consensus and Knowledge. Journal of Economic Theory 52, 178–189 (1990)
Parikh, R., Ramanujam, R.: A Knowledge based Semantics of Messages. J. Logic, Language and Information 12 (2003)
Plaza, J.A.: Logics of Public Communications, in Knowledge, Rationality & Action, A Special Section of: Synthese. An International Journal for Epistemology, Methodology and Philosophy of Science 158(2), 165–179 (2007)
Satterthwaite, M.A.: Strategy-proofness and Arrow’s Conditions: Existence and Correspondence Theorems for Voting Procedures and Social Welfare Functions. Journal of Economic Theory 10, 187–217 (1975)
Savage, L.: The Foundations of Statistics. Dover, New York (1972); Originally published in 1954 by John Wiley and Sons
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dean, W., Parikh, R. (2011). The Logic of Campaigning. In: Banerjee, M., Seth, A. (eds) Logic and Its Applications. ICLA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6521. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18026-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-18026-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-18025-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-18026-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)