Skip to main content

Identifying and Eliminating Inconsistencies in Mappings across Hierarchical Ontologies

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM 2010 (OTM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6427))

Abstract

Many applications require the establishment of mappings between ontologies. Such mappings are established by domain experts or automated tools. Errors in mappings can introduce inconsistencies in the resulting combined ontology. We consider the problem of identifying the largest consistent subset of mappings in hierarchical ontologies. We consider mappings that assert that a concept in one ontology is a subconcept, superconcept, or equivalent concept of a concept in another ontology and show that even in this simple setting, the task of identifying the largest consistent subset is NP-hard. We explore several polynomial time algorithms for finding suboptimal solutions including a heuristic algorithm to this problem. We experimentally compare the algorithms using several synthetic as well as real-world ontologies and mappings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Choi, N., Song, I.Y., Han, H.: A survey on ontology mapping. SIGMOD Rec. 35(3), 34–41 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Demetrescu, C., Finocchi, I.: Combinatorial algorithms for feedback problems in directed graphs. Inf. Process. Lett. 86, 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Doan, A., Halevy, A.Y.: Semantic-integration research in the database community. AI Mag. 26(1), 83–94 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Foam - a framework for ontology alignment and mapping. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Euzenat, J., et al.: Ontology alignment evaluation initiative (2010), http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/

  6. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Falconer, S.M., Storey, M.A.D.: A cognitive support framework for ontology mapping. In: Aberer, K., Choi, K.-S., Noy, N., Allemang, D., Lee, K.-I., Nixon, L.J.B., Golbeck, J., Mika, P., Maynard, D., Mizoguchi, R., Schreiber, G., Cudré-Mauroux, P. (eds.) ASWC 2007 and ISWC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4825, pp. 114–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Guo, J., Hüffner, F., Moser, H.: Feedback arc set in bipartite tournaments is np-complete. Inf. Process. Lett. 102(2-3), 62–65 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18(1), 1–31 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalyanpur, A., Parsia, B., Sirin, E., Grau, B.C.: Repairing unsatisfiable concepts in owl ontologies. In: Sure, Y., Domingue, J. (eds.) ESWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4011, pp. 170–184. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Kleinberg, J., Tardos, E.: Algorithm Design. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Koul, N., Honavar, V.: Learning in presence of ontology mapping errors. In: Web Intelligence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Meilicke, C., Stuckenschmidt, H., Tamilin, A.: Repairing ontology mappings. In: AAAI, pp. 1408–1413 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ten challenges for ontology matching. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5332, pp. 1164–1182. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, T.D., Parsia, B., Hendler, J.: A survey of the web ontology landscape. In: Cruz, I., Decker, S., Allemang, D., Preist, C., Schwabe, D., Mika, P., Uschold, M., Aroyo, L.M. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 682–694. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sanghvi, B., Koul, N., Honavar, V. (2010). Identifying and Eliminating Inconsistencies in Mappings across Hierarchical Ontologies. In: Meersman, R., Dillon, T., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems, OTM 2010. OTM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6427. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16949-6_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16949-6_24

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16948-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16949-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics