Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: A Review of the Evidence

  • Conference paper
Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research (TEAR 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 70))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a systematic review on the literature concerning the potential contribution of Enterprise Architecture (EA) to the achievement of various business goals. The review revealed the current state of the scientific and practitioner’s literature concerning the potential benefits of EA as describing 29 unique contexts within which EA has been found to deliver 100 unique benefits through 3 value-generative mechanisms. This review enhances the understanding of EA of both researchers and practitioners by providing valuable information on the potential benefits of EA and their relationships, their applicability (context), and the mechanisms that generate them. Additionally, this review is expected to enable practitioners to establish the business case for EA by means of scientifically grounded reasoning about how EA might contribute to the achievement of certain business goals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bucher, T., Fischer, R., Kurpjuweit, S., Winter, R.: Enterprise architecture analysis and application: An exploratory study. In: EDOC Workshop TEAR (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schelp, J., Stutz, M.: A balanced scorecard approach to measure the value of enterprise architecture. In: 2nd Workshop on Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research Via Nova Architectura, pp. 5–11 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Steenbergen, M.v., Brinkkemper, S.: Modeling the contribution of enterprise architecture practice to the achievement of business goals. In: 17th International Conference on Information Systems Development (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kappelman, L., McGinnis, T., Pettite, A., Sidorova, A.: Enterprise architecture: Charting the territory for academic research. In: 14th Americas Conference on Information Systems, University of North Texas (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Slot, R., Dedene, G., Maes, R.: Business value of solution architecture. Advances in Enterprise Engineering II, vol. 28, pp. 84–108. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Martinsons, M., Davison, R., Tse, D.: The balanced scorecard: a foundation for the strategic management of information systems. Decis. Support Syst. 25(1), 71–88 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lankhorst, M.: Enterprise Architecture at Work: Modeling, Communication and Analysis. Springer, Heidelberg (December 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Denyer, D., Tranfield, D., van Aken, J.E.: Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ. Stud. 29(3), 393 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pawson, R.: Evidence-based policy: the promise of realist synthesis. Evaluation 8(3), 340 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bunge, M.: Technology as applied science. Technol. Cult. 7(3), 329–347 (1966)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aken, J.E.v.: Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br. J. Manag. 16(1), 19–36 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Tranfield, D.R., Denyer, D., Smart, P., Bedfordshire, M.K., Cranfield, M.K.: Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. Br. J. Manag. 14, 207–222 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Higgins, J.P.T., Green, S.: Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. 5.0.1 edn. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Centre for Reviews & Dissemination: Systematic Reviews: CRD’s Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Healthcare. Centre for Reviews & Dissemination, University of York, York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hopewell, S., McDonald, S., Clarke, M., Egger, M.: Grey literature in meta-analyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2) (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dickersin, K., Scherer, R., Lefebvre, C.: Systematic reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews. Br. Manag. J. 309(6964), 1286–1291 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Murphy, E., Dingwall, R., Greatbatch, D., Parker, S., Watson, P.: Qualitative research methods in health technology assessment: a review of the literature. Health Tech. Assess 2(16), 1–274 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hammersley, M.: Reading ethnographic research: A critical guide. Longman Publishing Group, Berlin (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mays, N., Pope, C.: Assessing quality in qualitative research. Br. Med. J. 320(7226), 50–52 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Health Care Practice Research & Development Unit, U.o.S.: Evaluation tool for quantitative research studies (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. CASP: The critical appraisal skills programme (casp): 10 questions to help you make sense of qualitative research

    Google Scholar 

  23. Campbell, R., Pound, P., Pope, C., Britten, N., Pill, R., Morgan, M., Donovan, J.: Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc. Sci. Med. 56(4), 671–684 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Boaz, A., Ashby, D.: Fit for purpose?: assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pawson, R.: Evidence-based policy: in search of a method. Evaluation 8(2), 157 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pawson, R., Greenhalgh, T., Harvey, G., Walshe, K.: Realist review-a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 10(1), 21–34 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ross, J.W., Weill, P.: Understanding the benefits of enterprise architecture. CISR Research Briefings (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Engelsman, W., Iacob, M.E., Franken, H.M.: Architecture-driven requirements engineering. In: 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 285–286. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pulkkinen, M., Naumenko, A., Luostarinen, K.: Managing information security in a business network of machinery maintenance services business - enterprise architecture as a coordination tool. J. Syst. Softw. 80(10), 1607–1620 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kamogawa, T., Okada, H.: Enterprise architecture create business value. In: 9th Annual International Symposium on Applications and the Internet, pp. 205–208 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nilsson, A.: Management of technochange in an interorganizational e-government project. In: Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, p. 209 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boh, W.F., Yellin, D.: Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. J. Manag. Inform. Syst. 23(3), 163–207 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gregor, S., Hart, D., Martin, N.: Enterprise architectures: enablers of business strategy and is/it alignment in government. Inform. Tech. People 20(2), 96 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Obitz, T., Babu, M.K.: Enterprise architecture expands its role in strategic business transformation: Infosys enterprise architecture survey 2008/2009. Technical report (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Varnus, J., Panaich, N.: Togaf 9 enterprise architecture survey results. In: 23rd Enterprise Architecture Practitioners Conference (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Schekkerman, J.: Trends in enterprise architecture 2005: How are organizations progressing? Technical report (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Arnold, B., Land, M.O., Dietz, J.L.G.: Effects of an architectural approach to the implementation of shared service centers. In: 2nd International Workshop on Enterprise Applications and Services in the Finance Industry (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Martin, N., Gregor, S., Hart, D.: Advances in Government Enterprise Architecture. In: Government Enterprise Architectures: Enabling the Alignment of Business Processes and Information Systems. Information Science Reference - Imprint, pp. 409–437. IGI Publishing, Hershey (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Boucharas, V., Steenbergen, M.v., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S.: The contribution of enterprise architecture to the achievement of organizational goals: Establishing the enterprise architecture benefits framework. Technical Report UU-CS-2010-014, Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kaplan, R.M., Norton, D.: Strategy maps: converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Niemi, E.: Enterprise architecture benefits: Perceptions from literature and practice. In: 7th IBIMA Conference on the Internet & Information Systems in the Digital Age, pp. 14–16 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Noran, O., Bernus, P.: Service oriented architecture vs. enterprise architecture: Competition or synergy? In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds.) OTM-WS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5333, pp. 304–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Computing Sciences, Utrecht University, Padualaan 14, 3584CH, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Vasilis Boucharas, Slinger Jansen & Sjaak Brinkkemper

  2. Architecture and Business Solutions, Sogeti Netherlands B.V., Postbus 76, 4130 EB, Vianen, The Netherlands

    Marlies van Steenbergen

Authors
  1. Vasilis Boucharas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marlies van Steenbergen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Slinger Jansen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sjaak Brinkkemper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Public Research Centre Henri Tudor, 29, avenue John F. Kennedy, 1855, Luxembourg-Kirchberg, Luxembourg

    Erik Proper

  2. Novay Enschede, P.O. Box 589, 7500, Enschede, AN, The Netherlands

    Marc M. Lankhorst

  3. Deutsche Telekom Laboratories, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587, Berlin, Germany

    Marten Schönherr

  4. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Section of Systems Engineering, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5015, 2600, Delft, GA, The Netherlands

    Joseph Barjis

  5. Faculty of Technology, Policy and Management, Section of Information and Communication Technology, Delft University of Technology, P.O. Box 5015, 2600, Delft, GA, The Netherlands

    Sietse Overbeek

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Boucharas, V., van Steenbergen, M., Jansen, S., Brinkkemper, S. (2010). The Contribution of Enterprise Architecture to the Achievement of Organizational Goals: A Review of the Evidence. In: Proper, E., Lankhorst, M.M., Schönherr, M., Barjis, J., Overbeek, S. (eds) Trends in Enterprise Architecture Research. TEAR 2010. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 70. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16819-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16819-2_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16818-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16819-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation