Skip to main content

Integrating Implicit Induction Proofs into Certified Proof Environments

  • Conference paper
Integrated Formal Methods (IFM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 6396))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We give evidence of the direct integration and automated checking of implicit induction-based proofs inside certified reasoning environments, as that provided by the Coq proof assistant. This is the first step of a long term project focused on 1) mechanically certifying implicit induction proofs generated by automated provers like Spike, and 2) narrowing the gap between automated and interactive proof techniques inside proof assistants such that multiple induction steps can be executed completely automatically and mutual induction can be treated more conveniently. Contrary to the current approaches of reconstructing implicit induction proofs into scripts based on explicit induction tactics that integrate the usual proof assistants, our checking methodology is simpler and fits better for automation. The underlying implicit induction principles are separated and validated independently from the proof scripts that consist in a bunch of one-to-one translations of implicit induction proof steps. The translated steps can be checked independently, too, so the validation process fits well for parallelisation and for the management of large proof scripts. Moreover, our approach is more general; any kind of implicit induction proof can be considered because the limitations imposed by the proof reconstruction techniques no longer exist. An implementation that integrates automatic translators for generating fully checkable Coq scripts from Spike proofs is reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baader, F., Nipkow, T.: Term Rewriting and All That. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barthe, G., Courtieu, P.: Efficient reasoning about executable specifications in Coq. In: Theorem Proving in Higher Order Logics, p. 64 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barthe, G., Stratulat, S.: Validation of the JavaCard platform with implicit induction techniques. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonichon, R., Delahaye, D., Doligez, D.: Zenon: An extensible automated theorem prover producing checkable proofs. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4790, pp. 151–165. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bouhoula, A., Rusinowitch, M.: Implicit induction in conditional theories. Journal of Automated Reasoning 14(2), 189–235 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Brotherston, J.: Sequent Calculus Proof Systems for Inductive Definitions. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (November 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bundy, A., van Harmelen, F., Horn, C., Smaill, A.: The Oyster-Clam system. In: Stickel, M.E. (ed.) CADE 1990. LNCS, vol. 449, pp. 647–648. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Contejean, E., Courtieu, P., Forest, J., Pons, O., Urbain, X.: Certification of automated termination proofs. In: Frontiers of Combining Systems, pp. 148–162 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Courant, J.: Proof reconstruction. Research Report RR96-26, LIP, Preliminary version (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dixon, L.: A Proof Planning Framework for Isabelle. PhD thesis, University of Edinburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Imine, A., Rusinowitch, M., Oster, G., Molli, P.: Formal design and verification of operational transformation algorithms for copies convergence. Theoretical Computer Science 351(2), 167–183 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaliszyk, C.: Validation des preuves par récurrence implicite avec des outils basés sur le calcul des constructions inductives. Master’s thesis, Université Paul Verlaine - Metz (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Klein, G., Andronick, J., Elphinstone, K., Heiser, G., Cock, D., Derrin, P., Elkaduwe, D., Engelhardt, K., Kolanski, R., Norrish, M., Sewell, T., Tuch, H., Winwood, S.: seL4: Formal verification of an operating-system kernel. Communications of the ACM 53(6), 107–115 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lindblad, F., Benke, M.: A tool for automated theorem proving in Agda. In: Filliâtre, J.-C., Paulin-Mohring, C., Werner, B. (eds.) TYPES 2004. LNCS, vol. 3839, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Nahon, F., Kirchner, C., Kirchner, H., Brauner, P.: Inductive proof search modulo. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 55(1-2), 123–154 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Pientka, B., Kreitz, C.: Automating inductive specification proofs in NuPrL. Fundamenta Informaticae 1(2), 182–209 (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. The Spike prover, http://code.google.com/p/spike-prover

  18. Rouached, M., Godart, C.: Reasoning about events to specify authorization policies for web services composition. In: ICWS, IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pp. 481–488. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Rusinowitch, M., Stratulat, S., Klay, F.: Mechanical verification of an ideal incremental ABR conformance algorithm. J. Autom. Reasoning 30(2), 53–177 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Stratulat, S.: A general framework to build contextual cover set induction provers. J. Symb. Comput. 32(4), 403–445 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Stratulat, S.: Automatic ‘Descente Infinie’ induction reasoning. In: Beckert, B. (ed.) TABLEAUX 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3702, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Stratulat, S.: Combining rewriting with Noetherian induction to reason on non-orientable equalities. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) RTA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5117, pp. 351–365. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Stratulat, S., Demange, V.: Validating implicit induction proofs using certified proof environments. In: Poster Session of 2010 Grande Region Security and Reliability Day, Saarbrucken (March 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  24. The Coq Development Team. The Coq reference manual - version 8.2 (2009), http://coq.inria.fr/doc

  25. Wilson, S., Fleuriot, J., Smaill, A.: Inductive proof automation for Coq. In: Coq Workshop (to appear 2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stratulat, S. (2010). Integrating Implicit Induction Proofs into Certified Proof Environments. In: Méry, D., Merz, S. (eds) Integrated Formal Methods. IFM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6396. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16265-7_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16265-7_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-16264-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-16265-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics