Skip to main content

Logical Knowledge Representation of Regulatory Relations in Biomedical Pathways

  • Conference paper
Information Technology in Bio- and Medical Informatics, ITBAM 2010 (ITBAM 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 6266))

Abstract

Knowledge on regulatory relations, in for example regulatory pathways in biology, is used widely in experiment design by biomedical researchers and in systems biology. The knowledge has typically either been represented through simple graphs or through very expressive differential equation simulations of smaller sections of a pathway.

As an alternative, in this work we suggest a knowledge representation of the most basic relations in regulatory processes regulates, positively regulates and negatively regulates in logics based on a semantic analysis. We discuss the usage of these relations in biology and in artificial intelligence for hypothesis development in drug discovery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Caspi, R., Altman, T., Dale, J.M., Dreher, K., Fulcher, C.A., Gilham, F., Kaipa, P., Karthikeyan, A.S., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L.A., Paley, S., Popescu, L., Pujar, A., Shearer, A.G., Zhang, P., Karp, P.D.: The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 38, D473–D479 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heinrich, R., Rapoport, S.: Metabolic regulation and mathematical models. Prog. Biophys. Molec. Biol. 32 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kanehisa, M., Goto, S.: KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 27–30 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Matthews, L., Gopinath, G., Gillespie, M., Caudy, M., Croft, D., de Bono, B., Garapati, P., Hemish, J., Hermjakob, H., Jassal, B., Kanapin, A., Lewis, S., Mahajan, S., May, B., Schmidt, E., Vastrik, I., Wu, G., Birney, E., Stein, L., D’Eustachio, P.: Reactome knowledgebase of human biological pathways and processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D619–D622 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Eker, S., Knapp, M., Laderoute, K., Meseguer, P.L.J., Sonmez, K.: Pathway logic: Symbolic analysis of biological signaling. In: Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 2002, pp. 400–412 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Heidtke, K.R., Schulze-Kremer, S.: BioSim–a new qualitative simulation environment for molecular biology. Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol. 6, 85–94 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gene Ontology-Consortium, GO ontology relations. geneontology.org/GO.ontology-ext.relations.shtml (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ashburner, M., Ball, C.A., Blake, J.A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J.M., Davis, A.P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S.S., Eppig, J.T., Harris, M.A., Hill, D.P., Issel-Tarver, L., Kasarskis, A., Lewis, S., Matese, J.C., Richardson, J.E., Ringwald, M., Rubin, G.M., Sherlock, G.: Gene ontology: tool for the unification of biology. The Gene Ontology Consortium. Nat. Genet. 25, 25–29 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Smith, B., Ashburner, M., Rosse, C., Bard, J., Bug, W., Ceusters, W., Goldberg, L.J., Eilbeck, K., Ireland, A., Mungall, C.J., Leontis, N., Rocca-Serra, P., Ruttenberg, A., Sansone, S.A., Scheuermann, R.H., Shah, N., Whetzel, P.L., Lewis, S.: The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration. Nat. Biotechnol. 25, 1251–1255 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Blonde, W., Antezana, E., De Baets, B., Mironov, V., Kuiper, M.: Metarel: an ontology to support the inferencing of semantic web relations within biomedical ontologies. In: International Conference on Biomedical Ontology, Conference proceedings, Nature preceedings, July 2009. pp. 79–82 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Smith, B., Ceusters, W., Klagges, B., Köhler, J., Kumar, A., Lomax, J., Mungall, C., Neuhaus, F., Rector, A.L., Rosse, C.: Relations in biomedical ontologies. Genome Biol. 6, R46 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beisswanger, E., Lee, V., Kim, J.J., Rebholz-Schuhmann, D., Splendiani, A., Dameron, O., Schulz, S., Hahn, U.: Gene Regulation Ontology (GRO): design principles and use cases. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 136, 9–14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Workman, C.T., Mak, H.C., McCuine, S., Tagne, J.B., Agarwal, M., Ozier, O., Begley, T.J., Samson, L.D., Ideker, T.: A systems approach to mapping DNA damage response pathways. Science 312, 1054–1059 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Smith, B., Rosse, C.: The role of foundational relations in the alignment of biomedical ontologies. MEDINFO, 444–448 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Blackburn, P., Benthem, J.F.A.K.v., Wolter, F.: Handbook of Modal Logic. Studies in Logic and Practical Reasoning, vol. 3. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Braüner, T., Ghilardi, S.: First-order modal logic. In: Blackburn, P., Benthem, J.F.A.K.v., Wolter, F. (eds.) Handbook of Modal Logic, pp. 549–620. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. W3C OWL Working Group: OWL 2 web ontology language document overview. Technical report, W3C (October 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/REC-owl2-overview-20091027/

  19. Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: Mary likes all cats. In: Baader, F., Sattler, U. (eds.) Description Logics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, CEUR-WS.org. vol. 33, pp. 213–226 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lutz, C., Sattler, U.: The complexity of reasoning with boolean modal logic. In: Proceeding of Advances in Modal Logic 2000, AiML 2000 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Pubmed: Medline entrez, search data base for biomedical litterature (2010), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/entrez?db=PubMed

  22. Zambach, S.: A formal framework on the semantics of regulatory relations and their presence as verbs in biomedical texts. In: Proceedings of the Eigth International Conference on Flexible Query Answering Systems, pp. 443–452. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Dolbey, A., Ellsworth, M., Scheffczyk, J.: Bioframenet: A domain-specific framenet extension with links to biomedical ontologies. In: Proceedings of KR-MED, November 2007, pp. 87–94 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Andreasen, T., Bulskov, H., Lassen, T., Zambach, S., Jensen, P.A., Madsen, B.N., Thomsen, H.E., Nilsson, J.F., Szymczak, B.A.: SIABO - semantic information access through biomedical ontologies. In: Dietz, J.L.G. (ed.) KEOD, pp. 171–176. INSTICC Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zambach, S., Hansen, J.U. (2010). Logical Knowledge Representation of Regulatory Relations in Biomedical Pathways. In: Khuri, S., Lhotská, L., Pisanti, N. (eds) Information Technology in Bio- and Medical Informatics, ITBAM 2010. ITBAM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6266. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15020-3_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15020-3_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-15019-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-15020-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics