Skip to main content

Gestures in Geology: The Roles of Spatial Skills, Expertise, and Communicative Context

  • Conference paper
Spatial Cognition VII (Spatial Cognition 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6222))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Spatial thinking is an essential part of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), domains that entail external spatial representations such as 2D graphics, 3D models, and—the focus here—gestures. University students (a) read aloud information about the geological concepts of strike and dip, (b) completed strike and dip tasks, and (c) explained these concepts to another student via audio and video. Gestural patterns varied across reading, audio, and video contexts in interaction with participant variables of spatial skill and prior geology coursework. Only novices gestured during reading, interpreted as novices’ attempts to aid their own conceptual understanding of new information. All participant groups produced different gestural patterns in audio versus video contexts, suggesting the communicative intent of many gestures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. National Research Council: Learning to think spatially: GIS as a support system in the K-12 curriculum. National Academy Press, Washington (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stieff, M.: Mental rotation and diagrammatic reasoning in science. Learning and Instruction 17, 219–234 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tversky, B.: Spatial schemas in depictions. In: Gattis, M. (ed.) Spatial schemas and abstract thought, pp. 79–112. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liben, L.S.: Education for spatial thinking. In: Damon, W., Lerner, R. (series eds.), Renninger, K.A., Sigel, I.E. (vol. eds.). Handbook of child psychology, 6th edn. Child psychology in practice, vol. 4, pp. 197–247. Wiley, Hoboken (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kastens, K.A., Rivet, A.: Using analogical mapping to assess the affordances of scale models used in Earth and environmental science education. In: Hölscher, C., et al. (eds.) Spatial Cognition VII. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6222, pp. 112–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Crowder, E.M., Newman, D.: Telling what they know: The role of gesture and language in children’s science explanations. Pragmatics and Cognition 1, 341–376 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hegarty, M., Mayer, S., Kriz, S., Keehner, M.: The role of gestures in mental animation. Spatial Cognition and Computation 5, 333–356 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kastens, K.A., Manduca, C.A., Cervato, C., Frodeman, R., Goodwin, C., Liben, L.S., Mogk, D.W., Spangler, T.C., Stillings, N.A., Titus, S.: How geoscientists think and learn. EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union 90, 265–272 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kastens, K.A., Ishikawa, T.: Spatial thinking in the geosciences and cognitive sciences: A cross-disciplinary look at the intersection of the two fields. In: Manduca, C.A., Mogk, D.W. (eds.) Earth and mind: How geologists think and learn about the Earth, pp. 53–76. The Geological Society of America, Boulder (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Kastens, K.A., Rivet, A.: Multiple modes of inquiry in Earth science. The Science Teacher 75, 26–31 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kastens, K.A., Agrawal, S., Liben, L.S.: Research in science education: The role of gestures in geoscience teaching and learning. Journal of Geoscience Education 54, 262–268 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Singer, M., Radinsky, J., Goldman, S.R.: The role of gesture in meaning construction. Discourse Processes 45, 365–386 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kastens, K.A., Agrawal, S., Liben, L.S.: How students and field geologists reason in integrating spatial observations from outcrops to visualize a 3-D geological structure. International Journal of Science Education 31, 365–394 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liben, L.S., Christensen, A.E., Kastens, K.A.: Spatial foundations of science education: The illustrative case of instruction on introductory geological concepts. Cognition and Instruction (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Piaget, J., Inhelder, B.: The child’s conception of space. Norton, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hostetter, A.B., Alibali, M.W.: Raise your hand if you’re spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture 7, 73–95 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodwin, C.: Environmentally coupled gestures. In: Duncan, S., Cassell, J., Levy, E. (eds.) Gesture and dynamic dimensions of language, pp. 195–212. John Benjamins, Amsterdam (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Roth, W.-M.: Gestures: The leading edge in literacy development. In: Saul, E. (ed.) Crossing borders in literacy and science instruction: Perspectives on theory and practice, pp. 48–70. International Reading Association, Newark (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roth, W.-M., Lawless, D.: Scientific investigations, metaphorical gestures and the emergence of abstract scientific concepts. Learning and Instruction 12, 285–304 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Broaders, S.C., Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z., Goldin-Meadow, S.: Making children gesture brings out implicit knowledge and leads to learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136, 539–550 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Church, R.B., Goldin-Meadow, S.: The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge. Cognition 23, 43–71 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Garber, P., Goldin-Meadow, S.: Gesture offers insights into problem-solving in adults and children. Cognitive Science 26, 817–831 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liben, L.S.: Educational applications of geographic information systems: A developmental psychologist’s perspective. In: Barstow, D. (ed.) First national conference on the educational applications of geographic information systems, pp. 44–49. TERC, Cambridge (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liben, L.S., Golbeck, S.L.: Performance on Piagetian horizontality and verticality tasks: Sex related differences in knowledge of relevant physical phenomena. Developmental Psychology 20, 595–606 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Liben, L.S.: Performance on Piagetian spatial tasks as a function of sex, field dependence, and training. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 24, 97–110 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Thomas, H., Lohaus, A.: Modeling growth and individual differences in spatial tasks. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 58(9), Serial No. 237 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Liben, L.S.: The Piagetian water-level task: Looking beneath the surface. In: Vasta, R. (ed.) Annals of Child Development, vol. 8, pp. 81–143. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Thomas, H., Jamison, W., Hummel, D.D.: Observation is insufficient for discovering that the surface of still water is invariably horizontal. Science 181, 173–174 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rebelsky, F.: Adult perception of the horizontal. Perceptual and Motor Skills 19, 371–374 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sholl, M.J., Liben, L.S.: Illusory tilt and Euclidean schemes as factors in performance on the water-level task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 21, 1624–1638 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. De Lisi, R., McGillicuddy-De Lisi, A.V.: Individual differences in adolescents’ horizontality representation: Associations with vocational major and gender. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 34, 437–449 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Shea, D.L., Lubinski, D., Benbow, C.P.: Importance of assessing spatial ability in intellectually talented young adolescents: A 20-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology 93, 604–614 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. U.S. Geologic Survey. (n.d.), http://geomaps.wr.usgs.gov/parks/gmap/gmap3.html (Retrieved October 6, 2007)

  34. Bakeman, R., Quera, V.: Analyzing interaction: Sequential analysis with SDIS and GSEQ. Cambridge University Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Landis, J.R., Koch, G.G.: The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33, 159–174 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  36. Ehrlich, S.B., Levine, S.C., Goldin-Meadow, S.: The importance of gesture in children’s spatial reasoning. Developmental Psychology 42, 1259–1268 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Goldin-Meadow, S., Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z.A.: Gesturing gives children new ideas about math. Psychological Science 20, 267–272 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Cook, S.W., Mitchell, Z., Goldin-Meadow, S.: Gesturing makes learning last. Cognition 106, 1047–1058 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Valenzeno, L., Alibali, M.W., Klatzky, R.: Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology 28, 187–204 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kastens, K.A., Liben, L.S., Agrawal, S.: Epistemic actions in science education. In: Freksa, C., Newcombe, N.S., Gärdenfors, P., Wölfl, S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition VI. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5248, pp. 202–215. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Alibali, M.W., Flevares, L.M., Goldin-Meadow, S.: Assessing knowledge conveyed in gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology 89, 183–193 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goldin-Meadow, S., Alibali, M.W., Church, R.B.: Transitions in concept acquisition: Using the hand to read the mind. Psychological Review 100, 279–297 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. McNeill, D., Cassell, J., McCullough, K.E.: Communicative effects of speech-mismatched gesture. Research on Language and Social Interaction 27, 223–237 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liben, L.S., Christensen, A.E., Kastens, K.A. (2010). Gestures in Geology: The Roles of Spatial Skills, Expertise, and Communicative Context . In: Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J.A., Newcombe, N.S. (eds) Spatial Cognition VII. Spatial Cognition 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6222. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14748-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14749-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics