Skip to main content

Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language and Meaning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 6042))

Abstract

The paper provides a compositional account of cumulative readings with non-increasing modified numerals (aka van Benthem’s puzzle), e.g., Exactly three boys saw exactly five movies. The main proposal is that modified numerals make two kinds of semantic contributions. Their asserted/at-issue contribution is a maximization operator that introduces the maximal set of entities that satisfies their restrictor and nuclear scope. The second contribution is a post-supposition, i.e., a cardinality constraint that needs to be satisfied relative to the context that results after the at-issue meaning is evaluated. We take contexts to be sets of variable assignments relative to which quantificational expressions are interpreted and which are updated as a result of their interpretation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • van Benthem, J.: Essays in Logical Semantics. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1986)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • van den Berg, M.: Some Aspects of the Internal Structure of Discourse. The Dynamics of Nominal Anaphora. PhD dissertation, Univ. of Amsterdam (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brasoveanu, A.: Donkey Pluralities. Linguistics and Philosophy 31, 129–209 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büring, D.: The Least at least Can Do. In: Chang, C.B., Haynie, H.J. (eds.) Proceedings of WCCFL 26, Cascadilla, pp. 114–120 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Champollion, L.: Cumulative Readings of Every Do Not Provide Evidence for Events and Thematic roles. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds.) Amsterdam Colloquium 2009. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6042, pp. 213–222. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chierchia, G., Fox, D., Spector, B.: The Grammatical View of Scalar Implicatures. In: Portner, P., et al. (eds.) Handbook of Semantics. de Gruyter, Berlin (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  • Constant, N.: English Rise-Fall-Rise: A study in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Intonation. MA thesis, UC Santa Cruz (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Farkas, D.F.: Varieties of Indefinites. In: Jackson, B. (ed.) Proceedings of SALT XII, pp. 59–83. CLC (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, M.: Scope Splitting and Cumulativity. In: Nouwen, R., Dotlačil, J. (eds.) Proceedings of the ESSLLI Workshop on Quantifier Modification (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B., Nouwen, R.: The Semantics of Scalar Modifiers. Language 83, 533–559 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heim, I.: The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, PhD dissertation, UMass (Published in 1988 by Garland) (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kratzer, A.: The Event Argument and the Semantics of Verbs. UMass. ms (2000), http://semanticsarchive.net

  • Krifka, M.: At least Some Determiners Aren’t Determiners. In: Turner, K. (ed.) The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface from Different Points of View, pp. 257–291. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Landman, F.: Events and Plurality. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauer, S.: Free relatives with -ever: Meaning and Use. Stanford, ms (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D.: Adverbs of Quantification. In: Keenan, E. (ed.) Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 3–15. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nouwen, R.: Two Kinds of Modified Numerals. To appear in Semantics and Pragmatics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Robaldo, L.: Distributivity, Collectivity and Cumulativity in terms of (In)dependence and Maximality. Univ. of Turin, ms (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, C.: Modal Subordination and Pronominal Anaphora in Discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 683–721 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, B.: Plurals and Events. MIT Press, Cambridge (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwarzschild, R.: Pluralities. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: Assertion. Syntax and Semantics 9, 315–332 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Szabolcsi, A.: Strategies for Scope Taking. In: Szabolcsi, A. (ed.) Ways of Scope Taking, pp. 109–154. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • Umbach, C.: Why do modified numerals resist a referential interpretation? In: Proceedings of SALT XV, pp. 258–275. CLC (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brasoveanu, A. (2010). Modified Numerals as Post-Suppositions. In: Aloni, M., Bastiaanse, H., de Jager, T., Schulz, K. (eds) Logic, Language and Meaning. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6042. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14287-1_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14286-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14287-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics