Abstract
The main objective of this chapter is to reflect on one element of the conceptual frame for urban development analysis – the goal dimension of the sustainability vision – and its application to the case of Santiago de Chile. The chapter provides essential insights into the sustainability concept in general and the current situation, debates and controversies in Santiago de Chile in particular. Basic sustainability documents are discussed in terms of their local applicability and potential for associated programmes and activities. For the case of Santiago, political and institutional characteristics and current thematic priorities are outlined. The Helmholtz Integrative Sustainability Concept is tendered as an appropriate tool for sustainability analysis. Using indicators as a basic tool, application of the concept to the Santiago case within a broader conceptual landscape provides orientation for a variety of decision-makers. Initial findings on the translation of the concept into indicators and its application to several thematic fields are presented and the most urgent sustainability performance deficits, defined as risks for future development, are highlighted. Based on an overview of the current sustainability policy in the Santiago Metropolitan Region, future challenges are identified and practical recommendations put forward.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acselrad, H. (1999). Sustentabilidad y Ciudad. EURE, 74(2), 36–46.
Arancón Sánchez, S. (2007). Grounding sustainable development in urban planning. A framework of sustainability indicators for the metropolitan region of Santiago de Chile. Masters thesis supported by the “Risk Habitat Megacity” project. Madrid.
Barton, J., et al. (2007). Cuan sustentable es la Región Metropolitana de Santiago? Metodologías de evaluación de la sustentabilidad. Santiago.
Capra, F. (1982). The turning point: Science, society and the rising culture. London: Bantam.
Chuaqui, T., & Valdivieso, P. (2004). Una ciudad en busca de un gobierno: una propuesta para Santiago. Revista de Ciencia Politica, 24(1), 104–127.
CSD – United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (2002). Second Local Agenda 21 survey. Background paper, No. 15. New York: International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI).
de la Espriella, C. (2007). Designing for equality: Conceptualising a tool for strategic territorial planning. Habitat International, 31(3–4), 317–332.
Ehrlich, P. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Sierra Club Ballantine.
European Commission (2004). EU member state experiences with sustainable development indicators. Luxembourg. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_OFFPUB/KS-AU-04-001/EN/KS-AU-04-001-EN.PDF. Accessed 2 May 2011.
GORE – Gobierno Regional de la Región Metropolitana (2005). Ordenamiento territorial ambientalmente sustentable. Santiago de Chile.
GORE – Gobierno Regional de la Región Metropolitana (2006). Estrategia de desarrollo regional. Santiago de Chile.
Gallopin, G. (2003). Sostenibilidad y desarrollo sostenible: un enfoque sistémico. Santiago de Chile.
Grunwald, A., & Kopfmüller, J. (2006). Nachhaltigkeit Eine Einführung. Campus Verlag: Frankfurt a. Main.
Hák, T., Moldan, B., & Dahl, A. (2007). Sustainability indicators. A scientific assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Heiland, S., Tischer, M., Döring, T., Pahl, T., & Jessel, B. (2003). Indikatoren zur Zielkonkretisierung und Erfolgskontrolle im Rahmen der Lokalen Agenda 21. UBA-Texte 67/03. Berlin.
Heinrichs, D., Nuissl, H., & Rodríguez Seeger, C. (2009). Dispersion urbana y nuevo desafios para la gobernanza (metropolitana) en America Latina: el caso de Santiago de Chile. EURE, 35(104), 29–46.
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007). Fourth assessment report. Geneva.
IISD – International Institute for Sustainable Development (2002). Compendium of sustainable development indicator initiatives. Winnipeg
Jiménez Herrero, L. (2000). Desarrollo sostenible. Transición hacia la coevolución global. Madrid: Ediciones Piramide.
Kates, R., Parris, T., & Leiserowitz, A. (2005). What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice. Environment, 47(3), 9–20.
Köckler, H. (2005). Zukunftsfähigkeit nach Maß. Kooperative Indikatorenentwicklung als Instrument regionaler Agenda-Prozesse. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Kopfmüller, J. (2006). Ein Konzept auf dem Prüfstand. Das integrative Nachhaltigkeitskonzept in der Forschungspraxis. Berlin: edition sigma.
Kopfmüller, J., Brandl, V., Jörissen, J., Paetau, M., Banse, G., Coenen, R., & Grunwald, A. (2001). Nachhaltige Entwicklung integrativ betrachtet. Konstitutive Elemente, Regeln, Indikatoren. Berlin: edition sigma.
Lele, S. (1991). Sustainable development: A critical review. World Development, 19(6), 607–621.
Meadows, D., et al. (1972). The limits to growth. London: Signet.
Naredo, J. M. (1996). Sobre el origen, el uso, y el contenido del termino sostenible. Cuidades para una futuro mas sostenible. http://habitat.aq.upm.es/cs/p2/a004.html. Accessed 2 May 2011.
Opschoor, H., & Reijnders, L. (1991). Towards sustainable development indicators. In O. Kuik & H. Verbruggen (Eds.), In search of indicators of sustainable development (pp. 7–27). New York: Springer.
Orellana, A. (2009). La gobernabilidad metropolitana de Santiago: la dispar relación de poder de los municipios. EURE, 35(104), 101–120.
Parris, T., & Kates, R. (2003). Characterizing and measuring sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 28, 559–586.
Quiroga, R. (2001). Indicadores de sostenibilidad ambiental y de desarrollo sostenible: estado del arte y perspectivas. Santiago de Chile: Naciones Unidas.
Steinberg, F. (2005). Strategic urban planning in Latin America: Experiences of building and managing the future. Habitat International, 29(1), 69–93.
UNEP (2002). Melbourne principles for sustainable cities. http://www.iclei.org/fileadmin/user_upload/documents/ANZ/WhatWeDo/TBL/Melbourne_Principles.pdf. Accessed 2 May 2011.
UNEP/IEUT-UC (2004) Perspectivas del medio ambiente urbano: GEO Santiago. Santiago de Chile.
Volkery, A., & Ribeiro, T. (2009). Scenario planning in public policy: understanding use, impacts and the role of institutional context factors. Technological Forecast & Social Change, 76(9), 1198–1207.
von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory. London: George Braziller.
Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint. Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, BC: New Society Publishers.
WCED – United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Weiland, U. (2006). Sustainability indicators and urban development. In W. Wang, T. Krafft, & F. Kraas (Eds.), Global change. Urbanization and health (pp. 241–250). Beijing: China Meteorological Press.
Williams, G. (1999). Metropolitan governance and strategic planning: A review of experience in Manchester, Melbourne and Toronto. Progress in Planning, 52, 1–100.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barton, J.R., Kopfmüller, J. (2012). Sustainable Urban Development in Santiago de Chile: Background – Concept – Challenges. In: Heinrichs, D., Krellenberg, K., Hansjürgens, B., Martínez, F. (eds) Risk Habitat Megacity. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11544-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11544-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11543-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11544-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)